Everyone charged with a penal transgression has the right to be considered “innocent until proven guilty” according to the US Constitution. Did the prosecution use reasonable and accurate evidence to prove Adnan guilty in the murder case of Hae Min Lee? On January 13 in 1999, a Woodlawn high school senior, Hae Min Lee disappeared after school, and one month later on February 10 in 1999, her body was found buried in the Leakin Park in Baltimore, Maryland. Adnan Syed, her ex-boyfriend, was convicted of this murder by the state of Maryland after one year in February 25 in 2000. The eyewitness of this case was Jay Wilds, a former friend of Adnan, who testified against him and stated that Adnan told him he was going to kill Hae, Jay also reported …show more content…
The lawyer stated that a girl named Nisha was called from Adnan Syed’s cell at 3:32 after Hae was murdered, and the call lasted for about two minutes. Adnan said it was Jay who called Nisha accidentally because at that time Jay had his car and phone. On the other hand, Jay said that he doesn’t know who Nisha is and Adnan called Nisha in front of him. The call logs presented at the court placed Adnan with Jay, and it wasn’t even sure who called Nisha. It proves that one call can decide the entire case. Adnan claims that this one butt-dial call should not ensure a conviction. Nisha stated she didn’t have a voicemail and she tried to recall. Whoever had Adnan's phone could've pocket-dialed Nisha and have left a two-minute voicemail. Adnan calls log on the day when Hae disappeared determines that Adnan was with Jay and his call to Nisha was intentional. In the trail, Nisha testifies that she spoke to both Adnan and Jay. Adnan stated that Jay had his car and phone during that time. If Nisha testified that she spoke to both, then Adnan might be lying. Nisha’s call was the most substantial evidence in Adnan case which might ensure Adnan guilty or …show more content…
The prosecutor introduced Adnan Syed by saying, “The defendant is of Pakistani background, he is a Muslim.” The prosecution tried to encourage the jurors to consider Adnan’s religion and ethnicity which is Pakistani although Adnan was born in America. The persecutor was trying to say that it was Adnan’s religious belief which motivated him to kill Hae. The prosecution stated that Adnan murdered Hae because his honor was besmirched which was supported by prosecutor’s reference to cultural stereotypes about Muslims. However, according to the podcast and other resources, there was not any factual evidence which stated that Adnan murdered Hae because of his religion or ethnicity other than Adnan’s parents did not approve his relationship with Hae. The prosecution asserted that Adnan was not a good Muslim because Adnan and Jay would do illegal actions together such as smoking and drinking which wasn't permitted in his religion. Adnan claims that only his some illicit activities with Jay do not make him a bad Muslim and his religion and ethnicity should not ensure a conviction. However, Islamic Society of Baltimore Muslims had a different point of view about Adnan. Some people agree to that Adnan was a good boy and some people accused him of stealing money from the mosque. Some people said, they saw Adnan stealing money from the mosque charity box. Adnan also agreed that he used to steal money
STATEMENT OF THE CASE On January 13, 1999. the defendant Adnan Syed (seventeen), lived in Baltimore County, Maryland and was accused of the murder of his ex girlfriend, Hae Min Lee (seventeen). Jay Wilds is involved in the crime, an acquaintance of Adnan who claims to have helped bury the body of Hae Min Lee. Stephanie Mcpherson, was Jay Wilds girlfriend at the time of the murder.
On January 13, 1999, Hae Min Lee was reported missing and later found dead in Leakin park in Baltimore . Adnan Syed, Hae Min Lee’s ex boyfriend was convicted of the murder then sentenced to life on the charge of 1st degree murder. Jay Wilds was the witness for the trial that stated that Adnan had killed Hae, and both Adnan and himself had buried the body. Adnan’s lawyer for this trial was Christina Gutierrez who failed to use the only alibi for Adnan, Asia McClain, and go through DNA evidence on Hae. I believe Adnan Syed should be granted a second trial, because of the competence of his attorney.
Adnan Syed couldn’t have killed his former high school girlfriend, Hae Lee, 20 years ago: “I know it’s physically impossible for people to be in two places at one time.” Syed, the subject of Sarah Koenig’s hit podcast “Serial” and Amy Berg’s HBO docuseries “The Case Against Adnan Syed,” was convicted of killing Lee, his ex-girlfriend, in 1999. But McClain, who was never called to testify during the first trial, said she had a 20-minute conversation with Syed in their high school’s library at the same time prosecutors say Lee was murdered”. Another witness who testified to seeing Adnan was Rabia, She claims to have gone into the library and saw Adnan printing papers, they even managed to chat for a bit, As Koenig comments, “And she told me, that
The prosecution case against Adnan Syed was mainly based on the testimony of Jay wilds, who said he helped bury Hae Min Lee's body. Jay's testimony was supported by the cell phone records that placed Adnan on the site on the Day Hae Min Lee disappeared. According to the prosecution, the evidence sayed that Adnan had a motive to Kill Hae, because he was jealous and possessive of her. However, there are inconsistinces in Jay’s testimony, which has changed multiple times over the years. Some people also claimed that He was pressured into providing false testimony by the police.
She writes a letter to Judge Mitchell apologizing if she misled the court. She says she had misconstrued information from Mr. Marshall of the Justice Department. She talked to him again and he made it clear that there was not a pattern of young Pakistani men committing murder after they had been jilted and then running off to Pakistan. And that other case she mentioned the frighteningly similar one out of Chicago. “That case parallels Adnan’s case only that it involves a Pakistani male charged with murder where the victim was known to the defendant,” she wrote.
The time of when Adnan got out of school, when the murder happened and after the murder happens (when he goes to track practice) it doesn’t make sense and is kind of impossible for him to do that all in a specific amount of time and make it back in time to show up for track practice. Sarah Koenig states, “The State contended that Hae was killed between 2:15 and 2:36 p.m. at the Best Buy parking lot, about a mile from Woodlawn High School. That’s the twenty-one minute window in which to commit the murder. Which may seem like a long time, Adnan wrote, but it is virtually impossible if you consider the following facts, which he then listed. For example, “when the final bell rings at 2:15, you can’t just leave and jump in your car,” he wrote.
It was his word alone that suggested that Adnan wanted Hae dead. Not a single person thought this, not Hae, not their family, not their friends and not even anyone at school. The only problem here is that Adnan doesn't seem to remember exactly where or what he was doing that day. Who could blame him though, we can’t even remember what we eat the other day. He had to remember something that happened 15 years ago and although it was a big memory something so simple as smoking weed, could cause someone to forget what they did.
If thats is the case then how is Adnan guilty? How did they get enough evidence to actually prove that Adnan is guilty? It doesn’t make any sense. People remember some of it but not all of it.
According to an article in Rolling Stone magazine, Syed’s guilt is clear due to incriminating evidence. Cell phone records indicate that on the night January 13, 1999, he was in the area where Lee’s body was located (McDonnell-Parry). Additionally, Jay Wilds, a primary witness and friend at the time, testified that on the day of Lee’s disappearance Adnan Syed was angry about his ex-girlfriend having started a new relationship with someone else and that he wanted to kill her (McDonnell-Parry). This reaction to her moving on further incriminated him because it gave him a motive to kill her (McDonnell-Parry). Through this evidence, the prosecuting attorneys presented a convincing argument against Adnan
But somewhere along the line, someone has been making up lies and I believe that that someone is Jay. I believe that Adnan is not guilty and here are some reasons why. The first reason that I believe that Adnan is not guilty is because he is
Adnan is Innocent Do you remember what you did on this day, exactly one week ago? You might remember some things about that day, or you might remember nothing. How about if I asked what you did 6 weeks ago on this day? Could you tell me?
The person giving the police all the facts about what Adnan did was Jay Adnan’s friend that helped him kill Hae, but did anyone take the possibility that Jay may have killed Hae by himself and just said that Adnan did it and he was the helper. Jay could have set the hole thing up because when Jay was interviewed by the cops in the 1st interview he said that they
We have heard the fine details of Jay and Adnan, the inconsistencies and lastly the court 's case declaring Adnan’s guilt. Through the weeks I have carefully analyzed this case in an unbiased manner, looking at all possible scenarios. Today we will talk about my final thoughts and answer the remaining questions on all of our minds. Overall, after concisely reviewing the details of this case, I firmly believe Adnan is innocent.
Of course, many people think Adnan Syed is guilty of murdering Hae by contradicting himself, by saying, “I am in here for my own mistakes.” He might have been on the edge of confessing his guilt until Sarah caught this and asked what he meant, and quickly recovers from his mistake. Adnan also slips his tongue by saying that he wants people to only look at the evidence, and not his personality. If I were convicted of a crime I would certainly like to have my personality be looked at, if I were innocent. So they could see what good I have done.
This case isn’t any different from the rest. American Pakistani boy is believed to have murdered his ex-girlfriend. Being in this relationship meant he was being a “bad Muslim”, but his religious beliefs had nothing to do with the case. The State pointed out forbidden things he did, such as doing drugs and sex before marriage (“The Alibi”). Adnan was just a typical teenager with strict immigrant parents (“The Alibi”).