Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Westminster Political Model

1456 Words6 Pages
Westminster political model has been operational in the United Kingdom for a long time. The model is set in such a way that it concentrates power in the executive arm of the government. The kind of democracy that is practiced under the model is a representative democracy (Bache and Flinders 2004, p.31). That is, the parliament has given the executive the power to make laws on behalf of the people. Lately, Westminster model is failing in the political system in Britain (Marsh, Richards and Smith 2003, p. 306). It is therefore essential to dig deep into the reasons why the political model is not relevant and find a new way of governing people. Democracy is best practiced when all the citizens are given the opportunity to identify some of the issues that are important to them. The political model has not been able to give the citizens audience in the United Kingdom to practice democracy (Richards and Smith 2006, p.181). The primary reason is that under the model, a small group of people is given powers by the parliament to act on behalf of all the citizens within the country (Lovenduski and Norris 2003, p. 84). The ineffectiveness of the model exists because of the shortfalls of the executives who are given the responsibility to represent the people. One of the disadvantages of the model is…show more content…
Due to the large size of the government in Britain, it is difficult to operate with a surety of what may come in the future time. The uncertainty is just beyond the control of the government (Hazell and Paun 2009, p.44). A good example of the difficulty realized in predicting uncertainties in the economy. The policy environment is equally set in such a way that it gives Westminster model full control over on the agenda of policy outcomes. It is critical to understand that such a policy system cannot in any way benefit the local citizens in

More about Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Westminster Political Model

Open Document