Aeromonas hydrophila is a gram negative rod bacterium. This bacterium spreads widely in various environments, especially in fresh water like in fish cultivation ponds, rivers, lakes, even in sparkling chlorinated drinking water reservoirs. This bacterium is known as a dangerous pathogenic bacterium in water biota like shrimps, oysters, frogs, and fishes (Martin-Carnahan & Joseph, 2005; EPA, 2006). The infection caused by this bacterium can lead to mass dead of fish in short period of time, which in turn causing a great loss of fishes. Formally, in a stable condition when the fish are not in stress, A. hydrophila existing in fish intestine has a role as microflora for water creatures (Illanchezian et al., 2010; Mangunwardoyo et al., 2010). A. …show more content…
The difficulty of differentiating A. hydrophila from other species in taxon Aeromonas comes from the complexity of taxonomy with various characters, even at the level of intraspecies (Soler et al., 2004; Ottaviani et al., 2011). The identification using the classical phenospecies still bears many mistakes. This has been proven by Beaz-Hidalgo et al. (2010) that based on the latest Bergey`s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, the positive test of ADH and hydrolysis cannot differentiate the A. hydrophila from A. sorbria. This conventional identification method still allows other bacteria with similar phenotypes to be identified as the same species, whereas probably they are not genetically the same. Besides that, the conventional phenospecies method needs very intensive efforts, using many chemicals and consuming much time, for example the identification using the biochemical test for Aeromonas sp. developed by Abbot et al. …show more content…
hydrophila in various water sources and foodstuffs becomes a problem. Its existence with the virulence in cultivation ponds of freshwater organisms, such as in fish or shrimp cultivation ponds, is a hidden danger that can be the time bomb that can explode any time. When the environment is worsening, it can be a deadly plague for the fresh water creatures in a short time. The mass death of gourami fish in just three days happened in Tasikmalaya, Indonesia, in 2003, which caused a great loss of fishes (Holipah, 2006). In laboratory scale, the concentration 105 – 1010 cfu/ml of A. hydrophila injected into 7-9 cm lele fish resulted in fish death, starting six hours after infection. The 100% death may be reached 2-3 days after the infection with a dose of 107 – 108 cfu/ml, but 6-7 days with a dose of 105 – 106 cfu/ml (Triyaningsih et al., 2014). It is also known that A. hydrophila is frequently related to human diarrhea; as reported by Alberts et al. (1990), 12.2% of toddlers with acute diarrhea in Dhaka, Bangladesh, were positive to have A. hydrophila. Based on those facts, a quick monitoring system is needed to monitor the fluctuation of A. hydrophila concentration in fish cultivation ponds and also to make the quality control of drinking water source more
Methods Unknown microbial #398 went through several of tests in order to identify its characteristics when isolated from a urine sample of Doris, a 64- year old patient with a kidney infection. To identify unknown #398, must prepare a working and a reserve stock by the inoculation from a broth culture and by quadrant streaking method on a PEM and EMP plates. The following test procedures were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours for observation and identification for unknown #398. The identification of unknown #398 followed test procedures from Brown1.
The purpose of this lab report is to employ a myriad of skills, tools and, methods learned throughout this semester to perform the appropriate tests for the identification of the assigned unknown bacteria. Add more background information here!!! The most important tools and techniques used during this identification include aseptic technique, microscopic examination and, the use of selective and differential media. Aseptic technique is an important tool for microbiologists. It is imperative that aseptic technique is maintained throughout the length of any test to avoid any cross-contamination that may lead to inaccurate results.
In this experiment, we cultivated an unknown specimen containing two microorganisms. The purpose of this experiment was to use a variety of biochemical test previously learned in the lab to identify the unknown bacteria. The identification of unknown bacteria is a major part of microbiology. Microbiologist observe samples such as blood and sputum in the laboratory for the presence of microorganisms. Identifying unknown bacteria is extremely important in clinical settings because it helps physicians find treatment for infections.
Being able to determining the identity of a bacterium is essential as treatments for different types of bacteria vary greatly. Without correct and timely identification of a bacterium, a patient’s condition is likely to worsen and the probability of death rises due to inaccurate treatment. The identification of bacteria is also crucial in the prevention of bacterial diseases. Identification of bacteria also aids the selection of antibiotics used against them. This assists in the reduction of the overuse and misuse of antibiotics which aids bacterial resistance to antibiotics.
Mosquitos soon became resistant and the only approach was to use more chemical sprays. Deaths of many birds were due to bio magnification caused by the extraneous amounts of toxins in water. Suzuki acknowledges how his faith on “predictive
Being able to identify unknown microbes from systematic testing is what makes the field of microbiology so important, especially in infectious disease control. Using the testing procedure laid out by the microbiology field we are able to identify unknown bacteria present in our everyday lives, and along the way learn a lot about their characteristics that separate them from other types of bacteria. Being able to do this is vital in order for us to understand why microbes are present in certain places, how they are able to grow and what restricts their growth, that way they can be combatted if necessary. These techniques for determining unknowns are also important for isolating and testing infectious disease microbes in order to prevent spreading. Another important aspect of being able to identify unknown microbes is the
The putrid smell of Escherichia coli is one that is immediately identifiable to the few lucky individuals who recognize its scent. It is also an aroma with which I became intimately sensitive to as I shuttled petri dishes of the bacterium in and out of an incubator. While my classmates shied away from the task of handling the pungent bacteria used in our recombinant DNA experiments, I took to the task eagerly, anything that would take me one step closer to my goal of researching. I had the opportunity to learn about lab techniques and cutting edge biology concepts the summer before my junior year, in an extracurricular biotechnology class at Northwestern University’s Center for Talent Development. The class, a three week crash course in the
saxatilis. The results and figures strongly supported this conclusion by illustrating the high densities of O. saxatilis present in riffles compared to pools, the broader distribution found in the Kiamichi River, the substrate composition of riffles, and the different water densities of riffles compared to pools at different times of the year. The conclusion is directly related to the question being asked in the experiment and offers an explanation for the small range of O.
As said by Louis Pasteur, the father of microbiology and the developer of “pasteurization”, “The more I study nature, the more I stand amazed at the work of the
Exercise 14: Unknown Identification Lab Report The purpose of the study was to identify the unknown bacterium using various biochemical tests in addition to using scientific methods in determining the outcome of the hypothesis. Each biochemical test will help determine the bacteria based on specific characteristics of each organism. I was giving unknown number 232. The first procedure that needed to be done after obtaining unknown bacterial mixture was to isolate the two bacteria in a pure culture using the streak plate method described in Microbiology Laboratory Manual Eight Edition. The material used was trypticase soy agar (TSA) plate, nutrient plate, starch agar, hydrogen peroxide, iodine reagent and microscope.
Stock culture: About 5,000 adult flies were maintained in steel framed cages (76 66 76 cm) covered with wired net. The flies were supplied with protein based artificial diets viz. , (i) baking yeast: sugar: water at 1:3:4 ratio, and (ii) casein: yeast extract: sugar at 1:1:2 ratio. Water was supplied in a conical flask socked with cotton ball. Temperature (°C) and relative humidity (RH) of the rearing room was maintained at 27 ± 2°C and 75 ± 5%, respectively by using air conditioner (Model No.
Symptoms get worse very quickly, and most who are infected die within a week. At the time of the 2011 deaths in DeSoto and St. Bernard parishes, officials could confirm the presence of the amoeba only in the homes of the deceased but not in the water systems. More advanced sampling technology is now available, so the water was tested. Exposure to Naegleria fowleri historically has occurred as a result of swimming or diving in warm freshwater lakes and rivers. An infection from Naegleria fowleri cannot occur when a person drinks water because stomach acid will kill the amoeba.
The bacteria profoundly attack the fish’s kidneys. There is a distinct difference apart from that it also causes swelling of the abdomen and is combined with 100% scale protruding over the body and bulging of the
Then, they extracted DNA from the corneal samples and used Real Time PCR (polymerase chain reaction) to amplify the DNA sequence, which they were able to run through a database, allowing them to entirely bypass having to culture the amoeba. " In only 120 minutes, we were able to detect and confirm the Acanthamoeba infection among all suspected cases," one of the Florence researchers