Summary of Alan Burdick’s Articles and Progression Alan Burdick, a staff writer for The New Yorker. His focus is on mainly on writing about scientific discoveries and information. Of the eight articles analyzed, seven of the eight contained a large portion of scientific information. Burdick’s articles all had the general public as the audience and majority of the articles analyzed had scientific groups included in the article’s intended audience. This audience group was achieved by creating a balance between casual tones and formal tones. By balancing the two, the audience range increased from just scientific groups reading formal texts and the general public reading only casual texts. Using tone, sentence structure, and diction, Burdick …show more content…
The genre of most of the articles was a scientific report or article. All eight articles analyzed contained scientific evidence as either the majority of the text or as evidence for another claim. Nearly all articles had a amalgamating of genres, usually a current event with the evidence written as a scientific article would be. The writing style in all the articles analyzed was a combination of an expository style and a persuasive style. Burdick’s articles have the perfect balance of an informative article with a hint of persuasion. This persuasion adds depth to the article, resulting in an effective writing style. Most of the articles contain an element of impartial tone, adding to the scientific report piece of the article. A casual to formal diction is used with alternating positive and negative diction to further persuade the reader in a gentle way. Burdick uses a variety of sentences lengths and structures, creating dimension in the text as well as an extra level of interest in the reader. Because of the varying sentence lengths, and lack of monochromatic tones, the interest level in the reader …show more content…
The topics covered, scientifically, range from paleontology, archeology, psychology, the study of batteries, engineering, and astronomy. Other topics and areas covered include politics, the work place, the history of humans and their evolution, swearing, pain tolerance, the psychological effects of keeping secrets, sextortion, and the Earth. Burdick’s style, used consistently throughout the articles was one of light, concealed persuasion in combination of hard fact. This style is very effective. The reader is learning and digesting new information while being unknowingly manipulated by Burdick himself. By using positive diction in certain areas and negative diction in others, Burdick is nudging the reader into an opinion on the information displayed, while ensuring that the reader is forming the desired opinion through
1491 by Charles Mann is a book about the Native Indians lives in a pre-Colombian America. Throughout the book Mann states that a great deal of the information he is giving is new speculation. However, not all of the speculation has evidence clear enough for one to be sure what he claims is true. Mann’s writing style is thought provoking, intriguing, and engaging. Mann specializes in scientific journalism.
To support his points and further convince the audience, the writer inserted substantial evidence based on copious amounts of research and first-hand observations. Furthermore, Text 2 has an informal, more laid-back tone. In addition, the writer continues to be commanding and honest with her opinions. For example, ‘we can be too sentisive’ and ‘we can be too quick to dismiss otherwise valid arguments as coming from places of privilege’. The writer feels comfortable enough to be brutally honest to the audience.
As an English professor in the University of Maryland, Jeanne Fahnestock is one of the modern rhetoricians with several master pieces. She mostly focuses on scientific rhetorical analysis in argument, especially in word choice and figures of speech. Her notable works are Rhetorical Gigures in Science(2002), A Rhetoric or Argument(2003) with Marie Secor, Rhetorical Style: The Uses of Language in Persuasion(2011). The book A Rhetoric of Argument with Marie Secor discusses about arguments in four aspects: definition arguments, causal arguments, evaluation arguments and proposal arguments. These four aspects, now become standard in many argument texts, give readers a constructive, engaging way to analyze arguments by other writers and to construct their own arguments.
Although Rick Perlstein and Liz Addison both wrote their article with the same purpose of appealing to the readers’ sense of emotion, credibility
As a columnist for the Washington Post, Esther J. Cepeda writes on a wide variety of topics, yet she consistently uses certain strategies to persuade her readers. Whether she is writing about heritage months or Lady Doritos, Cepeda employs several rhetorical techniques that capture her readers' attention and ensure they listen to her message. A few of the more notable strategies Cepeda applies include problem-solution organization, supporting research, personal anecdotes, and reasonable counterarguments. At the beginning of each column, Cepeda discusses a specific issue and follows it with her universal and surprisingly simple solution. This problem-solution organizational strategy allows Cepeda to detail the underlying severity of a problem
1. Writers of persuasive essays get people to adopt an idea or take a side using a thesis and strong supporting evidence. Words with positive and negative connotation also play a role in influencing people. An example of this is found on pages 42 and 43. Here, Al Gore uses valid evidence from multiple studies, and David Gelernter uses multiple words with negative connotation 2.
The Onion uses satirical humor to poke fun at modern advertisements and the gullibility of Americans have by mocking the techniques used to sell consumer goods; it does this through its mocking publication of a product called MagnaSoles. This article uses quotes from customers that have bought MagnaSoles, subtle jokes and puns, and the over exaggeration of the sciences implemented by Magnasoles. The article is rampant with subtle hints, jokes, and puns that key the reader in that this article is a joke. With the use of "pseudoscientists" and "pseudoscience" used throughout the article, as well as the "scientific-sounding literature", this is an indicator that this is not real science talking. It also makes fun of the use of making a paper seem more credible through its constant
Every major fast-food company has secrets. The secrets are out thanks to Eric Schlosser's book Chew on This. Chew on This is a non-fiction book written by Eric Schlosser to inform the readers about what really happens in a major fast-food franchise. The book Chew on This uses word choice, statistics, and one-sided arguments to show author's bias.
In the passage from The Great Influenza, John M. Barry uses rhetorical strategies like: antithetical ideas, extended metaphors, and diction to characterize scientific research. In the first paragraph, Barry uses a parallel sentence structure of an antithetical idea when discussing Certainty versus Uncertainty, he uses Certainty versus Uncertainty to intensify the words in the next paragraph. " Certainty creates strength. Certainty gives one something upon which to lean.
2008 AP english lang question 2 In the passage titled The great Influenza written by John Barry he talks about how scientists conduct scientific research and what it takes to be a scientist. He uses rhetorical strategies such as repetition, allusions and rhetorical questions. In the first paragraph Barry uses repetition numerous times with the words such as “certainty and uncertainty”.
Through shifting points of view, a purposeful structure, and settle choices in diction the author adds
Overall, all the articles were written in third person and therefore, didn’t have any personal insight on the issue and two of the three articles were written with a formal
In this passage from The Great Influenza John Barry Uses an informative tone, and extended metaphor, and logos to characterize scientific research as an analytical process. Throughout the passage Barry Consistently uses an informative tone to characterize scientific research as analytical. One example of this was when he said “A scientist must accept the fact that all his work, even beliefs, may break apart… out such findings”. This is a statement made by Barry, and could easily be changed into something less informative or almost suggestive to the reader, but Barry purposely put that quote the way he did to be straightforward and clear about what science is like, and what it does for you.
Situation: This piece of writing is argumentative based to discuss how scientism is not necessarily the answer to everything but plays a large role in society. In 2012, author Massimo Pigliucci uses the show “The Big Bang Theory” to discuss how science is highly important and necessary for our world to grow, but cannot replace literature, philosophy, and art because each aspect is needed for humans to thrive. An example from the text being that character Howard from the show has an equation to calculate his chances of having sex by figuring out the number of single women who may find him to be attractive (pg. 279). Pigliucci is pointing out that instead of exuding confidence and finding a female to talk to, Howard just uses science to justify why he can or cannot find a female to be with. The same issue is involving Sheldon when he creates “The Friendship Algorithm” in order to make friends (pg. 280).
If considering an article as a meal, after enjoying a good appetizer – the lead, it is expected that the main dish – the body will be as good as the appetizer to please diners. The body of an article is refered to the section that follows the lead. This is the information that the readers need to know. The main objective when writing the body is to get the reader to engage into the story and stimulate them to continue on reading until the end. It may be divided into smaller paragraphs.