ipl-logo

Alexander Hamilton's Arguments Against The Federalist Party

454 Words2 Pages

Why doesn’t our country suck; Federalism. The Federalist Party began in 1788. There was a major argument between two groups of people that provided a strong government and later led to what we know as the United States to form and become the united country as a whole. Alexander Hamilton was the leader in this large scheme. This party was a debate against the anti-federalists to form a government that made the states and the country stronger. The Federalists were a group of people that wanted a national government to be all as one instead of states having their own government. The anti-federalists were the ones that disagreed with having a national government. They thought that the select state should have power over itself in everything they did. The Federalist Party was an important part of …show more content…

Having a constitution would help the states overcome their debt and the tensions after the Revolutionary War. A few key federalists were some of the most well known people in United States History. Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, and John Jay. Most of the support for the Federalist for the Federalists came from large urban areas. They were mostly overpowered by bigger businesses and wanted their government to help manage the economy. Overall their main goal was to have a Constitution. The anti-federalists were the group that disagreed with having a strong national government, as they wanted a strong state government for their own benefits and a weaker national government. John Hancock was one of the main supporters in keeping a powerful state government, or what they thought was one. The main supporters of this atrocious idea were mostly dominated by the farmers and people living in rural areas. They did not want a Constitution and were completely fine with the Articles of Confederation, as they thought it would benefit them

Show More
Related

  • Analytical Essay 80 Of The Federalist Papers By Alexander Hamilton

    524 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. Modern day use the Federalist Papers to interpret the Constitution to look at the intentions of the framers and ratifies. This has been used on issues ranging from the power of the federal government in foreign affairs. However, there has been issues regarding the interpretation of the articles. That it is a lot of opinion that comes from the authors.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Federalist No. 78 By Alexander Hamilton

    1538 Words  | 7 Pages

    In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton lays out his vision for the Supreme Court of the United States. In this essay, Hamilton explains that the court should function as a “bulwark against majoritarian excesses” (O’Brien 181). His intension was for the court to protect the rights of the minority of the people against the tyranny of the majority. Hamilton makes the assurance that the court will use separation of powers as a “check” on Congress in order to protect against popular will (O’Brien 22). To accomplish this, the court had to function as an independent body in order to “safeguard” against the will of the majority and “occasional ill humors in the society” (O’Brien 349).

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons

    572 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalists supported the constitution, and wanted more power to the central government. The Federalists pushed for the constitution because it would give them more power, mainly because they were the government officials, in the central government. Opposed to the constitution were the Anti-Federalists, who wanted the Bill Of Rights not the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists believed the Senate would be too powerful and they (the others/ Anti-Federalists) would be oppressed. The Anti-Federalists wanted the same power as the Federalists, and those in the government.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton, The Federalists, And The Democratic-Republican Party

    84 Words  | 1 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton was a man who strongly believed in a powerful central government. This means he wanted the government to rule and have all the say. Thomas Jefferson was a man who strongly believed in the union of the states with government as a humble leader. The two opposing views caused two political parties to be born, The Federalists, and The Democratic-Republican Party. The Federalists would eventually cease in 1828 and The Democratic-Republican Party would spilt and become the two political parties of today.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    619 Words  | 3 Pages

    The federalist support the Constitution and not the Articles of Confederation because the Articles of Confederation had to be ratified by all 13 states.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Were The Anti-Federalists Really The Bad Guys

    1864 Words  | 8 Pages

    Were the Anti-Federalist really the Bad Guys? Many people throughout history often talk about the Federalist, but what about the Anti-Federalist? They are equally important, if not more important because of their contributions to the American people. The Anti-Federalist were adversaries of ratifying the United States Constitution, they had a strong fear for the repercussions of the government having too much power and their main fear was that the government would become an oppressor of the American people.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

    1743 Words  | 7 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the Federalists, they believed in the loose construction of the Constitution and were pro- Great Britain and industry. They believed that the wealthy and educated should lead and favored a strong-central government. The Antifederalists, on the other hand, were led by Thomas Jefferson and believed in the strict construction of the Constitution. They were pro-

    Read More

  • Opposing Views Of Alexander Hamilton On The Constitution

    824 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton was one of the key people in the ratification and debate on the constitution, and his philosophies helped shape present America, which is surprising as  Hamilton “ famously called ‘democracy’ a ‘disease’ and a ‘poison. ’”(Martin 21) This is not necessarily because he believed in a monarchy or other system of government, but because of his lack of faith in the public, his beliefs that the educated should rule, and the direction the American government took with the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. Although this ideology placed too much faith in the educated, it did consider real problems with a government created by and for the people. Unlike Jefferson who often left affairs more in the hands of the people, and time than his own actions, Hamilton felt that the people should simply vote for officials and then

    Read More

  • Excerpts From The Federalist No. 1 By Alexander Hamilton

    936 Words  | 4 Pages

    This reflection paper involves my insights by responding to questions on Excerpts from the Federalist No.1, written on October 27, 1787. which is one of many essays by Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton tried desperately to defend the constitution for the good of the people even though he had certain doubts and wanted to ratify it. The questions I will be answering are related to what he has written and what my opinions are. I will answer to the best of my knowledge and my thoughts.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    521 Words  | 3 Pages

    Anti-Federalists are those who are against the ratification of the Constitution because, they fear having a strong national government that would overpower the states. They are mainly state’s rights advocates as they remain loyal to their state governments. Additionally, they are generally poorer than the Federalists. Anti-Federalists believed that the Articles of Confederation was a good enough plan that did not need any modification. They believed the Constitution lacked the protection of basic political rights, and did not give any significant power to the states.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Federalist Paper 78, By Alexander Hamilton

    1692 Words  | 7 Pages

    In order to correctly analyze these questions we must have the general understanding that throughout the Federalists paper#78, Alexander Hamilton expressed the idea and importance he saw with how the Judicial branch needed to be fully independent from both the executive and legislative branch, in order to protect the public from deficiencies of decision-making by each of those two branches of government. Thus, Hamilton held that in order for the Judicial branch to perform its duties well this independence was needed. As a result, no errors in their judgment can be corrected by any institution or body of government, (Federalist Paper, #78), and in a modern sense you can see this with the supremacy of law, in which states that all acts of government

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Federalist No. 10

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    These people were known as the Anti-federalist and wrote their own essays as to what they believed, they also looked more to the Articles of Confederation because it did not look at the central government as much. On the other hand, the Federalist approved of the central government and are a strong supporter of the Constitution. The Federalist papers overall created and unified our government, because without the separation of powers we would not have a strong government because every state will act as their own. At the end once the ratification of the

    Read More

  • Process Essay: The Ratification Of The Constitution

    430 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Antifederalists” believe that there is no one to protect the rights of the people. Federalists, believe that the Constitution provides a perfect way to govern life in America. The constitution is a great document, and should ratified. The fundamental basic for government and law, is the concept of the social contract.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Bill Of Rights Anti Federalists

    432 Words  | 2 Pages

    Did you know that the Bill of Rights for the Constitution wasn’t even considered until anti-federalists argued about it? Although the Constitution benefited the United States with basic principles and laws, it had much more flaws than benefits. It made the national government too strong because they were able to tax states, it gave the President too much power, and there was no Bill of Right included. One major flaw in the Constitution was that the national government has the power to tax states. According to Brutus, “State governments know best which taxes are the most appropriate for their states.

    Read More

  • Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

    566 Words  | 3 Pages

    The antifederalists were a group of men who in general were ill educated compared to the federalists. Some of these people include back country farmers, poor farmers and illiterate debaters. They did not want a strong central government and believed in the Articles of Confederation. They thought the Bill of Rights were necessary to protect their rights. They feared without it, their rights would not be acknowledged.

    Read More

More about Alexander Hamilton's Arguments Against The Federalist Party

Open Document