ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

521 Words3 Pages

Currently, me and other Americans are undergoing a change in government. Because there are numerous major flaws in the Articles of Confederation, Congress thought it would be best to draft a new Constitution. Hopefully, the people behind the ratification of the new Constitution are making the right choice. Apparently Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay are helping out. They are calling James Madison the “Father of the Constitution.” 9 out of the 13 states are needed to approve the new document. Several states highly favored the Constitution and ratified it instantly. Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey were the first to jump on board. Georgia and Connecticut soon followed. There is controversy within Massachusetts, Maryland, …show more content…

Federalists favored an efficient government that could improve and protect their economic status. The Constitution promises a strong centralized government with a checks and balances system to even out …show more content…

Anti-Federalists are those who are against the ratification of the Constitution because, they fear having a strong national government that would overpower the states. They are mainly state’s rights advocates as they remain loyal to their state governments. Additionally, they are generally poorer than the Federalists. Anti-Federalists believed that the Articles of Confederation was a good enough plan that did not need any modification. They believed the Constitution lacked the protection of basic political rights, and did not give any significant power to the states. Massachusetts and three other states strongly opposed the new Constitution. To convince these states, a compromise was created to assure the creation of amendments as soon as possible. Finally, the states agreed to the ratification of the Constitution. By this point, Congress had enough states to approve the document. However, they wanted all the states to ratify it because, they believed that without New York and Virginia, who had a big population, the Constitution wouldn’t survive too

Show More
Related

  • Creating The Constitution: The New Jersey Plan And The Virginia Plan

    160 Words  | 1 Pages

    The constitution was a large process and is the “Supreme Law of the Land.” There was a separation of powers when the constitution was being created which resulted in the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive branches of government. During this time there was a meeting called the constitutional convention, where twelve of the thirteen colonies showed up. Two plans were debated during this process of creating the constitution, the New Jersey plan and the Virginia plan. Also happening as the constitution was being created and affect the outcome was the Connecticut compromise, where the two house legislature was made, the senate and house of representatives.

    Read More

  • Articles To Congress Dbq Essay

    305 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the revolutionary war congress felt that it needed a document to unite the states and set forth the principles and laws of the nation. Benjamin Franklin wrote the first draft of the articles to congress although it was never formally considered. It wasn’t until the 4th version of a draft was presented by John Dickinson, which congress began to feel closer to what they were looking for. After being revised three times, the document was approved to be submitted to the states in November 1777. All but one state, Maryland, agreed to the articles.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

    1511 Words  | 7 Pages

    The federal government does not have full, complete power of the government, due to the fact the federal government has to power to tax, regulate commerce, and put laws into place if and only if laws are so called “necessary and proper.” Another thing was for each branch of government to have their own separation of powers and check and balance other branches of government. Either though, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists did not agree on ideas, the Constitution is a document of the general compromise between the two political parties. The weakness of the Articles of the Confederation was resolved through the compromise of the Federalists and Anti-federalists political

    Read More

  • The Constitutional Convention Meet Between May And September Of 1787

    685 Words  | 3 Pages

    When we look back at our history there were a lot of decisions that had to be made when trying to figure out how to bring together a strong constitution. Our founders had a lot of strong opinions that had to be talked about when trying to reach a conclusion. There where challenges and compromises that had to be faced when trying to ratify the constitution. We all know that the constitutional convention meet between May and September of 1787. As we were already taught in class, there was a weak central government under that articles of confederation that had to be changed in order for everyone to agree upon.

    Read More

  • Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Analysis

    838 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the United States first gained their independence from Britain they needed to create a strong government for their colonies. The United States created their first government called the Articles of Confederation. The Articles came with many problems like no power to tax, no power to enforce the law, or regulate commerce. 10 years after having a weak government, they believed that a new type of government need to be created in order to become a strong government. They came up with the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    861 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ratification DBQ The Constitution is a document that still stands as America’s governing body, proving its strength and ability to stand the test of time. Although some aspects of the document are debated and the argument of what is and what is not constitutional is discussed often, it has proven to be right for America and its people. However, in the late 1700s, not everyone saw the Constitution as strong and supported its state-power-heavy predecessor, The Articles of Confederation.

    Read More

  • Anti Federalists Pros And Cons

    265 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before the famous Constitution became published on September 17, 1787, there was a huge democracy over it since some people supported it (federalists), while others opposed it (anti-federalists). Basically the main arguments used by the Anti-Federalists in the discussion of the U.S. Constitution was the fact that the Constitution offered too much power to the federal government and that the rights of the people were not promised through a Bill of Rights. In order to get their words out, they had ratified convections for the thirteen states. They choose to go to Pennsylvania first because of its size, influence, and wealth.

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    354 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalist agreed with the Constitution and its provisions. The wanted to create a strong federal government that will combine both the federal and the states as one nation. One of the weakness that the Articles of Confederation address is that the state had rights to levy taxes and regulate commerce. The states where in charge of the money coming in. The government concern was that if the states did not provide funds for the military they could not do anything about it.

    Read More

  • Why Is Federalism A Stronger Government

    199 Words  | 1 Pages

    I honestly believe that federalism is a stronger government. Federalism is the federal principle or system of government. Federalist believe in having a state with its own government. Federalist also believe in having a military which keeps the people under a Federalist state safe from outside harm. Also the Federalist believe having a national constitution meaning that there is a better balance of laws.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Central Power

    600 Words  | 3 Pages

    The constitution was the collective child of (9 of 13) STATES. Some of those states, like Virginia, only ratified this document by 53% a small majority, by representatives, not the people directly voting. 9:13 is 69% if that requirement of 69% was imposed on each state to ratify, this constitution would not exist. Not overwhelming popular at the time, but pushed hard by the likes of Hamilton; creator of, the bank of New York, a global bank. Some of those, reluctant and suspicious of this new Centralized Power wanted more protections for the people that had fought and won their independence from another Central Power, the King; thus the Bill of Rights, after the ratification, "We must pass it first" Sound familiar?

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

    Read More

  • William Paterson Pros And Cons

    725 Words  | 3 Pages

    Everyone who had any sense knew that the Articles of Confederation were weak and unsuccessful, and they knew that they had to fix it. So delegates from all of the states decided to meet in the Pennsylvania. However, Rhode Island did not send any delegates over to make suggestions for the Articles of Confederation. Over the course of a few months, the delegates worked on adding and strengthening the government that they spoke about in the Articles. At the end, thirty-nine of the fifty-five present delegates signed the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    The new constitution, a document granting the framework for a new democratic government, replacing the Articles of the Confederation. This new document gained approval from some of the citizens, but also raised questions and concerns from others. There was a constant back and forth between the two groups on whether or not the constitution should be ratified. This editorial provides historical background on the issue and expresses my opinion on which side I would’ve chosen.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

Open Document