Analysis Of Tim Horton's And Starbucks: Competitive Rivalry

Loblaw success can be attributed to its efficient operations, its customer loyalty programs, the popularity of its private label brands, and large-scale purchasing efficiencies. Loblaw has showed a good understanding of the Canadian grocery market due to its time-tested strategy. The company has presence in virtually all Canadian provinces with a tailored value chain that helps them achieve high revenue and standards. Additionally Loblaw offers competitive wages and benefits. Loblaw effective use of the 4+2 strategy had made it the market leader. The excellent execution of its strategy has allowed the company to be a differentiator among other Canadian grocers (especially with its President’s choice brand) and capturing about 32% of the Canadian grocery market shares. See Loblaw’s SWOT analysis below.

Their prices on petroleum allow them to be a substantial substitute in the industry because of the low switching costs. Consumers are also able to go to other quick service restaurants that either stand alone or operate in another convenient store.

Nowadays, the number of coffee drinkers are increasing. As the demand for coffee grows, the number of coffee chains is also increasing. Of that, the representative coffee chains in North America are Starbucks and Tim Hortons. Starbucks has the highest brand awareness amongst the world coffee chains. It started in Seattle, the United State in 1971. Starbucks has a very unique and symbolic logo that people can easily remember it. It features a two-tailed mermaid with long hair. The background of the colour is deep green and the rest of it is white. Whereas, Tim Hortons was established by Canadian hockey player, Tim Horton and the first open was in Hamilton, Canada in 1964. It is now the most beloved and favorite coffee chains in

Porter’s Five Forces framework is to identify the level of competition within the industry and to determine the strengths or weaknesses which can utilise to strengthen the position. The framework consist of five elements: threat of entry, bargaining power of supplier, bargaining power of buyer, threat of substitutes and industry rivalry.

Businesses have been playing a crucial role in people’s lives. No matter what they go or what the occupations they are; people are drawn to get involved in businesses. However, behind the scenes of the business thriving, the environment is deteriorated each day. Many development schemes are come up with the plan related with the depletion of the environment (Shah, 2002). Because of people and environmental damages, attentions were drawn to corporations for ensuring their sustainabilities. John Elkington designed a framework called Triple Bottom Line(TBL) (cite), which allows employees or entrepreneurs to adopt it for evaluating their performances regarding three dimensions people, planet, and profit. Starbucks is one of successful corporations which uses the Triple Bottom Line. The underlying Starbucks’s policy is to "inspire and nurture the human spirit-- one person, one cup, and one neighborhood at a time" ( Herbeck, 2012). The statement which was previously mentioned shows that Starbucks does not solely concentrate upon their profits, but their stakeholders’ well beings and the environment as well. This firm tries to launch many campaigns based on the three factors of the Triple Bottom Line. As a result, when it comes to Triple Bottom Line framework, Starbucks was given the opportunity to appraise and monitor its operations.

Apple has always surprised the world with its innovation starting from the invention of computer circuit board of Apple I in 1976 to world’s most successful personal computer and electronic device manufacturer. They brought revolutionary changes in user experiences in using personal computers and currently smart devices. The company was always under the supervision of visionary leaders and effective strategies applied by them made the Apple what it is today. The company faced several ups and downs during its operating timeline and remained successful in sustaining their position in the market as a leader. The Harvard Business School Case study of Apple Inc. focuses on the growth and strategic management of the company accordingly.

High industry sensitivity to the macroeconomic factors affecting disposable income, a main industry driver. Also impacting per capita coffee consumption, another industry driver.

Strong brand identification or high capital requirements can minimize the threat for competitors. As a brand Starbucks holds very strong reputation in the market. For people Starbucks is like second home as when they get tired of being home or workplace they can sip a coffee there and feel relaxed, which can relate in a bad manner for the new entrants. For Starbucks the threat of new entrants is modest as they have their own standards that are very high to compete with by the other firm. Locally there are many other coffee shops that are developing. High capital requirements makes other firms suffer in the industry. This component needs high necessities for any other company for approaching in the competition with Starbucks. Barriers to success are high whereas entry barriers are

The leading competitors in the fashion industry world wide according to research carries out by mbasKOOL.com is:

The author used the current situation of the coffee industry to define Tim Hortons' position in the coffee industry.

IMPACTS OF ECONOMIC FACTORS ON STARBUCKS The ongoing global economic recession is the prime external economic driver for Starbucks. As I already mentioned, this factor dented the profitability of Starbucks. This has convinced buyers to shift to cheaper alternatives. As they did not quit buying coffee, Starbucks should seek an opportunity here.The company has to deal with rising labor and operational costs. The inflationary environment and falling profitability is causing a lot of stress. Some other economic factors which can affect Starbucks are:  Local currency exchange rates  Local economic environment in different markets  Taxation level IMPACTS OF SOCIO-CULTURAL FACTORS ON STARBUCKS As already stated, Starbucks can offer cheaper products

It is true that the United States is the world largest economy based on GDP. It is famous for numerous huge brands in the World. For instance, in the field of technology and social networking, American Brands such as Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, etc. always take the lead in this market. In terms of food, we can not deny the succeed of McDonald or Duckin’ Donuts. And in the coffee markets, there is a firm which changed the way Americans and people around the world view and consume coffee - Starbucks. It is no exaggeration to say that Starbucks has brought American coffee’s ubiquity and defined the American coffee value. In this case, I will analyse Starbucks’ globalization and how it adapt to other areas as a model of American coffee

This part of the 5 Forces analysis shows that competition is one of the most important of Calm Coffee need to concern. The businesses have many competitors, which have different sizes, specialties and strategies. For example, Calm faces the competitive force of McDonald’s and Starbucks, as well as other specialty coffeehouse. The strong force of competition is also because of the low switching cost, which means that the customers can easy

Human Resource Management: Starbucks is known for its exceptionally learning base workers. They are the primary resources of the organization and they are given incredible advantages like investment opportunity, retirement records and a sound society. This successful human capital administration interprets into extraordinary client administrations. It was evaluated 91st in the 100 best work environment for by Fortune

Marigold, is the market leader in fresh dairy and beverage market in Malaysia, however it is not entirely dominated by its own brand. There is existence of a few numbers of beverage and fresh dairy milk competitors. Dairies products are considered very low degree of differentiation with competitors. Therefore, customers are allowed to compare products’ quality and especially price, is the factor that customers considered the most between the competitors’ products. The intensity of competition in dairy industry is very tough (UK Essays, 2015). There are few main competitors of Marigold in beverage and dairy product in the industry, which are Dutch Lady, F&N, Yeo’s and others competitors (Mira, 2013). According to UK Essays,