ipl-logo

Ancient Greece Source Analysis

815 Words4 Pages

Evaluation:
This source was written by Aristotle in 350 BCE as he was present at the time that democracy was developed it makes this source a primary source making it more reliable. The source provided a detailed explanation of the ancient Greeks democratic processes and development as the source was highly detailed it provides for a more reliable source. The source is translated by Sir Frederic G. Kenyon he is a palaeographer and a biblical and classical scholar this means that the source has been translated by a qualified professionally, thus meaning it is more reliable. This source is useful as it provides insight into the laws and rules of ancient Greece at the time this helped in the understanding of the ancient Greek society and what …show more content…

Forgione University and has a Bachelor of arts in classics and Ph.D. in classics from Duke university. Therefore, as he has comprehensive knowledge on the topic it can be inferred that the source is significantly reliable. This source is written academically and passively so it doesn 't demonstrate any bias, hence enhancing the reliability as there are only facts stated and there are not any opinions persuading the reader. The source cites a variety of primary sources this means that the information provided is substantiated improving the reliability. This source provided information to my essay that was influential in proving my thesis it explicitly stated the facts on the Athenian tribes and on the procedures carried out in the ancient Greeks form of the democratic system. The tribes were an important aspect of my essay as they were significant in the development of democracy, whilst democratic procedures were important to my essay as it helped me to understand the system and also provided to how did democracy cause Athens to thrive, therefore this source was useful to the essay. This source was also beneficial as it provided useful information that is highly reliable due to it being able to be corroborated. The points that were corroborated include citizens of Ancient Athens were paid for attending the assembly (Cartledge, 2011) therefore due to this corroboration it …show more content…

Additionally, the reliability affected by the emotive language being employed in this article as the author utilises this language it demonstrates that bias is present. This article was useful to my essay as it provided detailed information on the gaps in Athenian democracy. Moreover, the article provided a perspective that highlighted the differences in Athenian democracy such as that Athens was a direct democracy and that only some of the population was eligible, it mainly created a feeling that Athens was advanced for its time however the system had discrepancies. This information provided significantly when comparing modern societies to ancient Greece and also in justify as to why democracy was significant to Greece. A source that shares this view is the Ted-Ed video this also similarly to historian Paul Cartledge states that Athens was a direct democracy and also that not all of the population had the right to

Show More
Related

  • Was Ancient Athens: Was Ancient Athens Truly Democratic?

    335 Words  | 2 Pages

    Firstly, only male citizens had equal rights to vote, freedom of speech, and opportunities to participate directly in political arenas, which is only 12% of the population. For example Citizen women, Children of citizens, Metics, and Slaves did not have the right to vote which is the other 68%. This shows the Athenians were not democratic because not the whole population wasn 't a system of government, when not even half of them were. Also in Athen nobody had the freedom of thought and or speech. If someone

    Read More

  • A Primary Text Analysis: The Funeral Oration Of Pericles

    664 Words  | 3 Pages

    Pericles argues that Athens has become a model for others, and articulates what it is to be a good citizen. This can be seen when he says, “although the eyes of an enemy may occasionally profit by our liberality; trusting less in system and policy than to the native spirit of our citizens; while in education, where our rivals from their very cradles by a painful discipline seek after manliness, at Athens we live exactly as we please, and yet are just as ready to encounter every legitimate danger.” (Thucydides, 2.39) It proves that Ancient Athens’ valued greatness and worked in order to achieve the excellence of the state, by focusing on rebuilding themselves back up after the Persian war. Pericles played a big role in this because he showed his ambitions to rebuild Athens, which lead to the thriving of other subjects such as literature, philosophy, science, art, and religion.

    Read More

  • Did Thucydides Believe In The Story Of Athenian Democracy

    1793 Words  | 8 Pages

    Much of Athenian life and politics was based on stories of Athenian history. These historical events shaped the way and life of Athenian actions. Yet what happens when the histories that become integral aspects of Athens are based on inaccuracies? The history of Harmodius and Aristogeiton and the impact that it had on Athens was so deep that it led to the catastrophe that was the trials surrounding the defacement of the statues of Hermes. However, Athenian misunderstanding of the situation brings into question the legitimacy of Athenian democracy as a whole, something Thucydides uses his retelling of Harmodius and Aristogeiton to convey.

    Read More

  • Social Class In America Dbq Analysis

    375 Words  | 2 Pages

    A democracy is a form of government that is ruled by the people and controlled by the people. For example, here in the United states which is a democracy, everyone is allowed to vote and have land. Also, everyone is allowed to practice a religion of their choice. Athens was truly democratic because everyone had the equal justice, people were voted into office, and one’s social class did not determine what a person could become.

    Read More

  • Essay On Spartan Government

    1292 Words  | 6 Pages

    In this essay, I would like to answer and discuss the following questions: How did the people in Athens and Sparta obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community? Who held public office? What rules governed the selection of public office holders? How were two city-states similar in their governmental structures and how did they differ with each other? For the Spartans the right to participate and made important decisions from the entire community were only exercised by the adult and legitimate male citizens of Sparta.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Five Forms Of Government In Athens And Greece

    723 Words  | 3 Pages

    Introduction The city-states of Athens and Greece were ruled by a diverse range of governments. Under these were the monarchy, the aristocracy, the tyranny, the oligarchy and the democracy. In this paper we will compare and contrast these 5 forms of governments in ancient Greek city-states.

    Read More

  • Athens Was Not A Democracy Dbq Analysis

    1356 Words  | 6 Pages

    In a true democracy, nothing is random. Everyone should have a vote and the right to voice their thoughts. With this system they have put in place, people’s roles in the government are completely arbitrary. Thus proving, Athens was not a true democracy because government roles were picked at

    Read More

  • How Did Elect Ten Archons Affect The Future Of The Athenian Republic

    1072 Words  | 5 Pages

    In mid-6th c. BCE Athens, just five years after the government of Solon (594), the Athenians found themselves encompassed by dissension and internal disorder. Athens created the first democracy-based government, although their government became more of a republic with democratic attributes. They, the electors, were unable to elect an Archon for five years due to their dissent with the former principles ran by the State. All people within Athens viewed these principles with contempt, those in the elite[upper] class were ‘estranged because of the abolition of debts,’ while the poor people wanted the distribution of all land and property. Both parties were unhappy with the changes made by Solon’s reforms and so many refused to vote for any new

    Read More

  • The Three Definitions Of 'Demos' In Athenian Democracy

    326 Words  | 2 Pages

    What are the three definitions of “Demos”? The word ‘Demos’ has numerous definitions. However, to the Athenian democracy, three main definitions were essentially presented.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Ancient Athenian Democracy

    298 Words  | 2 Pages

    Democracy, a form of government, allows the people in their own nationality to vote for people in order for them to become representatives as a result to vote on new laws that would affect their own nationality. One of the many states of Greece, ancient Athens was indeed not truly democratic as a result of not inclusive, other than male citizens, to gain authority in ancient Athens, ¨Demokratia was ruled by male citizens only, excluding women, free foreigners(Metics) and slaves.¨(Document D), therefore ruling Athens was only accessible to male citizen since since women, free foreigners(Metics), and slaves were not allowed to rule as a result of not being male citizens. One of the many states of Greece, ancient Athens, was indeed not truly democratic as a result of not even using the essentials of democracy that is used today, “Thus, by our standards, it was oligarchy, not democracy.¨(Document D), therefore ancient Athens was not using democracy as their form of government, they were using oligarchy,another form of government in which a small group of people has power and control, as their form of government instead of democracy.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Athenian Democracy

    248 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Athenian’s radial democracy had many positive aspects, but it also proved to have its difficulties. First, only those who were “full citizens had an equal chance to serve in any number of capacities.” Which meant that slaves, resident foreigners, and usually women were barred from participating. Also, due to the radical nature of the government, the Athenian democracy was difficult to operate as assembly meetings were often attended by thousands of participants. Thus making it difficult for everyone to have a voice. Another major debacle of the Athenian democracy was the high cost associated with its operation.

    Read More

  • Democracy In Ancient Greek Democracy

    1305 Words  | 6 Pages

    Analysis The following analysis questions the democratic effects in the ancient citizenship Athens and eventually attempts to clarify the development of democracy and its significant influence in Europe in respect to equality. Ancient Greece assumes the role of a foundation of contemporary democracy in Europe being consistent with civilizations regarding the ideas of freedom and liberty. It is notwithstanding questionable how this civilization originated such political thought without considering the relevance of equality moreover separating certain instances inside the community by their own right: in ancient Athens, likewise in other citizenships around ancient Greece like Sparta, a male dominance is observable; only men at the age of eighteen are considered as part of the citizenship while foreigners, slaves and eventually women are intentionally segregated from the community. Such overpowering dominance in a technically fundamental democratic ‘polis’ significantly limits freedom and equal rights for any individual: Subordination of female ‘citizens’, as they were not even accounted as actual part of society, is self-evident in ancient Greek political thought therefore democracy fails in its effectiveness on ancient women.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Citizenship: Why Athens Was The Better System

    504 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unlike the Romans, Athenians had a strict but fair schedule that allowed them to enjoy citizenship equally. Equally, hard workers have brought Athens power just as much as hereditary leaders. According to Document B all citizens should be allowed to speak their opinion and have a share in election because of the hard work they do to make the city powerful. Athenians allowed poor and common men to win a position in government which was a transition from the wealthy having power to everyone having power.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ancient Greek And Roman Democracy

    1489 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Romans had a system of indirect democracy where the people had the power to vote for representatives who would advocate for them on the state level. The Greeks had a government in which the people directly were involved in the governmental and legislative process. In addition, both systems were flawed in their representation of their people in their respective governments through neglecting a large portion of their population. Both societies did well to create term lengths to decrease the likelihood of corruption and abuse of power through creating accountability. However, the Greek democracy was a caliber above its counterpart.

    Read More

  • How Did Greece Express Humanistic Values?

    643 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Greeks displayed their humanistic values through government by they utilizing an effective system of self governing. This system was a direct democracy, defined as “government by the people” or “rule of the majority.” In the Athenian Democracy, the Assembly was the regular

    Read More

More about Ancient Greece Source Analysis

Open Document