Have you ever wondered how Empires managed to rule over sizable populations that included individuals from various backgrounds? The Persian Empire, also known as The Achaemenid Empire (559 B.C.–338 B.C.) was the first of the Persian Empires to rule over sizable sections of what is currently known as the country of Iran (Abrams). Before the formation of the Persian empire, the Medes and the Persians were the two main ethnic groups in Iran; the Medes were originally the more powerful of the two (Balio). The establishment of Persia as a state and empire is credited to the Medes, and their kingdom was the largest at the time (Abrams). The Persian Empire was established as a result of Cyrus's successful revolt over the Medes in 550 Bc (Bailo). By dividing the empire into provinces that were administered by governors and allowing its citizens to worship any deity they chose, the Persian empire was capable of ruling over such a large population. …show more content…
The provinces were created by Darius, who also selected a governor for each. With each province had its own set of customs, legislation, and socioeconomic class, and the governorship largely being passed down from father to son (Abrams). Newly captured areas were also divided into provinces known as satrapies, which were administered by vassal rulers known as satraps, and the empire only required conscripts for the military and tribute from each province (Abrams). Despite having to provide the emperor with a gold or silver tribute, each province had a governor, a military coordinator, and a financial controller all of whom probably reported directly to the king himself (Abrams). With the empire’s provinces being run by the king’s vassal’s the empire was kept in
The population difference was also a major difference. Persian civilization had a size of 35 million people and the Greek civilization just about 2 million to 3 million. The Persian governors placed a very effective administrative system which was called satraps, which was in each empire’s twenty-three people earn responsibility while lower-level
A well-organized government and bureaucracy were vital to the smooth running of the large and culturally diverse empire. The sultan ruled as an absolute monarch, but the empire was divided into provinces ruled by governors. The sultan was also supported by a vast network of advisors, officials, and administrators who carried out the various duties of managing the empire. Showing a willingness to adapt different methods, the Ottomans used features from a mix of governmental systems to create their own form of rule, and they also allowed some local political and legal customs to continue to function. Given the diversity of the empire 's inhabitants, the Ottomans found it useful to divide populations into groups called millets, which were based
“For legitimizing their rulership, founders of Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empire claimed to descend from certain historical, political or religious leaders. Explain how each of these imperial dynasties claimed such legitimacies and compare them in terms of similarities and differences in the process of establishing their authority.” ALİHÜSEYİN ALTUNBAŞ SOCIAL SCIENCES UNİVERCITY OF ANKARA The Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires were three major Islamic empires (Gunpowder Empires) that emerged in the medieval period.
Empires throughout history have all had their own methods to political control. Some very similar others could not be any more different. Some of the great empires such as the Han and the Roman had very similar approaches to political control. Although both the Han and the Roman empires had similar forms of government both bureaucracies, both empires had many individual characteristics as well.
Ottoman Empire/ Safavid Empire Trends that both the Ottomans and the Safavids had during this time period was dealing with decentralization and recentralization. Both of these empires had to deal with the decline or rise of the tax revenues from the countryside. Another trend that both the Ottoman and Safavid empire had was the process of centralizing the military and administrative reforms (Chapter 25, in Patterns of World History, Vol. 2, p. 775). One cause that contributed to the rise of the Ottoman Empire was during the year1500 to 1700 when the Ottomans were the dominant political power in the Middle East and North Africa (Chapter 25, in Patterns of World History, Vol. 2, p. 762). During this time period, the Ottomans were flanked by two lesser realms which were the Persia in the east and the
The Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Empire, two significant Islamic empires, coexisted throughout the beginning of history. The Safavid Empire arose in the early sixteenth century, while the Ottoman Empire began in the early fifteenth. The Safavid Empire was based in Iran, but the Ottoman Empire was mainly based in the Middle East. Shia Muslims dominated the Safavid Empire, as opposed to Sunni Muslims who ruled the Ottoman Empire. Considering their differing religious convictions, the Safavids and Ottomans shared similar visual and cultural traditions.
The provinces, in turn, were critical for spreading Romanization throughout the empire. Provinces have the authority to decide on many issues, such as where roads should be built. They also carry out certain national laws, such as those governing the establishment of new nature preserves. The Romans established formal provinces and appointed former political officeholders to manage the new territories that came under their control in order to manage the new territories that came under their control. Given the distance between most provinces and Rome, these governors frequently wielded significant power and flexibility in dealing with local
Since there were so many people in the empire, the local governments could make sure everybody was happy and enforce stability and laws. It was also their duty to keep the economy running and in good
First, the most successful empires used a government system to rule over their people. The Aztecs turned each town into a city-state. Then, each city-state became unified into an empire. They had a supreme political leader who represented the gods. To decide, a council of people aided the emperor.
Religious authority along with political organization contributed to these empires’ success and development more than military power. Military power proved an empire’s power over its periphery and that they had the possibility of taking over other empires through a mighty
He was also considered a deity descended from the sun who in theory owned everything. The Empire was a federalist system with four provinces (Chinchay Suyu (NW), Anti Suyu (NE), Kunti (SW), and Qulla Suyu (SE)) and a central government centered on the Sapa Inca. The four corners of the provinces meet at Cusco, the capital. Each province had a governor who oversaw local who supervised agriculturally-productive river
Finally, they had a sophisticated way of controlling their empire, as they maintained communication with everyone throughout the empire,
Cyrus knew that if he attempted to directly control his entire empire, which spanned from the Indus Valley to the Aegean Sea, the empire would collapse from spreading itself too thin. To solve this problem, Cyrus divides his kingdom into provinces known as satrapies, whose governors (satraps) reported directly to himself (Document 5). King Ashoka, whose kingdom was not as far-reaching as the Persians’, took a more hands-on approach to ruling. In his sixth edict, Ashoka decreed that no matter what he was doing, he would always be available to receive any matters of state business (Document 7)
The Assyrian empire and the Persian empire were two of the earliest major empires in the world. The Assyrians came in to power first, ruling from 900 BC to about 600 BC and with the help of Cyrus the Great, the Persians rose to power around 550BC. The Assyrian and Persian militaries shared many similarities, but they also differed in some aspects. Some of their similarities include their battle tactics, the organization of their armies, and their success in conquering societies. One of the major differences that stood out the most was that the Assyrians used a more brutal approach when conquering and the Persians used a more enlighten approach and were more tolerant.
The Muslim world expanded tremendously during the 1300s to 1700s. The Ottoman Empire and Safavid Empire were two out of the three empires that had significant changes during these time. Though the Ottoman and Safavid Empire contrast on leaders and ways they rule, they similar on their declination and cultures. In the Ottoman Empire, multiples leaders contributed to the growth of the Empire. Ghazis were warriors for the Islam that followed strict Islamic rules.