Argument for the Minimum Driving Age On the subject of learning, Benjamin Franklin once said, “Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn”. To teach a child to ride a bike, they are placed on, given simple instructions, and condemned to lessons of trial and error with the false sense of security of a parent’s hands under their seat. This ends with scraped palms, raw knees, and broken trust but also the ability to ride a bike—an ability that they will never lose. At the next stage of life, children must learn to drive cars, however trial and error at this point have more dire consequences than scraped palms and bloody knees. Despite the consequences being greater, the false sense of security provided by the hand …show more content…
The idea that higher driving ages would stop teenage crashes is flawed. Programs in place in most places today placing restrictions on 16-year-old drivers are preventing a considerable number of crashes, but Dr. Scott Masten disputed these statistics, “when you look at the bigger picture across 18-and 19-year-olds, it looks like we’re offsetting those crashes. In fact, 75 percent of the fatal crashes we thought we were saving actually just occurred two years later,” (O’Connor, 23-27). These strict laws that aimed to prevent deadly crashes in 16 only delayed the crashes by preventing learning until a later age. In the defense of 16 to 18-year-olds, this delaying of crashes phenomenon is not exclusive to adolescents, “New Jersey’s tough laws may have just shifted the effect to 21-year-olds, similar to the way tough restrictions on 16 and 17-year-olds were followed by a spike in deadly crashes among 18-year-olds,” (O’Connor, 71-74). The spike, caused by restrictions in 16 and 17-year-olds, was recreated by the same restrictions on 18 and 19-year-olds, causing the same spike of deaths in the age group a year older than the restricted parties. These deadly crashes are not caused by the age of driving students. The crashes are a biproduct of the inexperience of these new
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Although it is a law commonly evaded; it prevents young people from car accidents and alcohol abuse or dependence. In the article is acknowledged that “more than 40 percent of college students reported at least one symptom of alcohol abuse or dependence”; a rate that would be highly increased if the drinking age is reduced. On top of that, it is worth considering the magnitude in which car accidents have dropped since the drinking age was lowered. The organization Mother Against Drunk Driving (MADD) CEO Chuck Hurley said “Nearly all peer- reviewed studies looking at the change showed raising the driving age reduced drunk-driving deaths.” It is undeniable that lowering the drinking age would generate an already managed issue in regards alcohol and its relation to car
In the novel, Brave New World, soma is a drug meant to escape emotions like pain, sadness, and depression. The drug represents the overall well-being of people, so they are always happy and content. In modern society, alcohol functions as soma-like, distorting your reality and making you forget your problems. Another parallel to soma is the societal pressure to drink from advertisements to social pressure. Similarly, the government of Brave New World pushes the usage of soma intensely and the people feel this pressure to consume this drug.
Traffic crash rates have been inversely related with the minimum legal drinking age since the 1970’s. Studies conducted since the 1980’s analyzed how the change in the MLDA affected the outcome of total traffic crashes for youth, drinking-driving convictions, single-vehicle nighttime crash fatalities, and alcohol problems among youth. The MLDA needs to be at 21, because 67% of the studies completed have concluded that there was a significant decrease in traffic crashes and crash fatalities when the drinking age was higher. In addition, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimated that in 1987 alone, 1,071 traffic crashes were prevented because of the MLDA of 21 (NHTSA 1989). Lower rates of death caused by vehicle crashes were found in states with higher MLDA’s throughout these various studies, and a 16% decrease in vandalism rates were observed in 4 states that raised their MLDA.
Drunk driving has decreased over the years and became less of a problem. “Laws making it illegal for someone under age 21 to purchase or possess alcohol have led to an 11 percent drop in alcohol-related traffic deaths among youth. From 1988 to 1995, alcohol-related traffic fatalities for youth ages 15 to 20 fell by 47 percent” (Degutis 3). Since the minimum legal drinking age was changed to 21, the results of drunk driving have lessen. The law is the only thing keeping the old problem from happening
Prior to reading, “Teen Drivers”, I thought teen driving was not as big as an issue as the general public made it. Now I am concerned by my age group’s actions and believe the strict driving laws for youth are justified by the facts and the attempts to prevent the rising accidents among teens. In the article, the author quotes the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, which states, “Crashes are the leading cause of death among American teens, accounting for more than one third of all deaths of sixteen- to eighteen-year-olds.” This not only proves the danger of inexperienced drivers to themselves, but also the danger they cause to other drivers on the road and the possible passengers in the car as well.
“Every year 500,000 teens are injured in a car wreck. Every year 5,000 teens die in a car wreck meaning an average of 14 teens die a day. Car crashes are the No. 1 killer of teens in the U.S. Even more than alcohol and drug abuse, violence and suicide”. Teens are always excited to earn their license and drive out on the road for the first time, but not every time will be a success, it might also be their last.
Because of safety concerns, many states have increased the age at which teens can begin to drive. Currently a teenager is required to be fifteen years and six months old to acquire a learner’s permit and sixteen years and three months old to acquire his or her license. Some adults believe teenagers are immature and not responsible. However, many teens have matured by the age of sixteen. The age requirement should not be raised from 16 to 18 because many individuals must be able to commute on their own, many individuals have family members who need to be driven places, and many individuals participate in activities that require them to be places at specific times.
The current legal drinking age has reduced the number of fatalities (Jones, Pieper, and Robertson 112). Although this is true, alcohol isn’t the only factor that should be considered. The enforcement of seat belt use is also a major point in the study that often isn’t referred to. Tests have show that the number of automobile-accident deaths have decreased since the mid-1900s; consequently, the MLDA was put into force around the same time. Many argue that the increased drinking age is why these accidents have decreased; however, around the same time the usage of safety belts in cars was emphasized more during this time.
You hear that many states have increased the age at which teens can begin to drive, raising the minimum driving age from 16 to 18 years old. Who would want to experience their first time driving at the age of 18 when it 's better to start at 16? I disagree with the new rule because teens would have to wait longer, you would always have to ask for a ride, and at the age of 16 many teens are cautious and mature enough to drive. As a teenager myself i wouldn 't want to have to wait until I turn 18 to drive. Many teens want to go places with their friends in their own car without having their parents driving them around.
Reform has been at the epicenter of society for years. Humans are far from perfect, and we must work to improve upon our mistakes through change. One blunder that hangs over our heads is the legal driving age of sixteen, and it is imperative that this wrong be righted. As it stands right now, anyone at the age of sixteen can drive a car, granted that they have supervision. But this measly protection pales in comparison with the bigger picture.
Everything you do in a car other than driving, such as talking to a passenger, singing a song, or checking your phone are all distractions which can take your mind off driving and cause an accident (Leonard). Having restrictions on new drivers has shown to decrease the amount of crashes caused by teenagers. “The researchers found that States with the most restrictive graduates licensing programs - such as those that required supervised driving teams as well as having night-driving restrictions and passenger limitations - saw a 26% reduction in the rate of fatal crashes involving 16-year-old drivers compared with states without any restriction” (Roan). Graduated licensing programs were linked to 1,348 fewer fatal crashes involving 16-year-olds. These restrictions prevent the teenagers from driving without an adult 21 or older, and with more than one passenger other than family in the car.
It’s concluded that making the driving age as a minimum age of sixteen has had a negative impact. This minimum age has affected the road safety negatively. It has caused premature death and severe injuries among teenagers aged 16 and 17 years old. Research suggests that some risks of driving are contributed to the lack of skill and experience. Furthermore, age plays a crucial role in deciding the risks valid in
Everybody looks forward to the day they turn 16 and take their road test for their driver’s license. Getting a driver’s license is like a gateway into adulthood, a right of passage some people may say. It’s been like this for years, ever since the early 20th century, when it was mandated for licenses to be issued to anyone wishing to operate one or more motor vehicles. In spite of the fact that this has been the norm for quite a while, there are people out there who wish to place more stern regulations such as raising the driving age. Although implementing stricter driving laws may seem a better option, it doesn’t always have superior outcomes to its countering opinion.