Our lives are unbelievably valuable so we should do everything rational to avoid deaths. Nowadays, teenagers are specifically dangerous due to their recklessness and they are the ones that are more likely to commit car accidents. Delaying when they get their driver’s license, the roads will be more secure. If the age of driving is increased, the amount of car crashes will decrease. For instance, teens think that they’re fearless, which is why they take silly risks unlike mature drivers.
Missouri law puts a one passenger restriction on drivers during the first six months they possess a license, under the circumstances that the passenger is not a family member and is not over the age of nineteen. Passengers increase the possibility of a fatal crash by almost fifty percent (#4). This is not to say that teen passengers intend to cause accidents in any way, but it is crucial that teen drivers understand the distraction factor that accompanies
This may mean that they would rush thing when trying to get their driving license. One other min reason could be because it would be breaking the adult rights in Britain if they weren’t allowed to get their driving license by the age of eighteen, this is because above this age they are responsible for all their actions. One of the ways that could happen so that it could limit the amount of deaths each year with out hanging the age limit for a driving license would be that they could, raise the difficulty of the driving tests, so that they can only pass once they are complete safe. It would also mean that the people passing their tests are completely capable for driving safely.
Raising the legal minimum driving age to 18 would help lower the number of accidents involving teens by cutting the amount of teenage drivers on the road in half. Obviously it would be objected by teens who want to drive as soon as they can, but in the long run it could save their lives. Teen drivers are by far the most dangerous on the road, and have the highest chance of getting into accidents. “The rate of crashes, fatal and nonfatal, per mile driven for 16-year-old drivers is almost 10 times the rate for drivers ages 30 to 59” (CBS/AP). This high accident rate is due largely because of the underdevelopment of the teenage brain.
They are all very dangerous because most teenagers start to drink at the ages of 16 and 17. People have debated about this before saying that teenagers are not mature enough to handle the alcohol consumption that most teenagers are drinking as of right now. Another reason for lowering the drinking age is because if the government were to lower the drinking age they would also have to lower the alcohol content in every drink that is related or contains alcohol. The drinking age should be lowered is because statistics show that since Louisiana has lowered its drinking age it has had about 3,379 and in Kentucky there is about 4,529 so statistics say that there has been 1,150 more alcohol related crashes than in Kentucky.
Legal driving age has been a constant argument as the major reason for death among teens is these accidents happening. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1678 drivers in 2014 have been reported dead aged 16 to 20 years along with some new issues like texting while driving; other mobile usages along with distracted driving (Rogers, 2015). Driving age should remain at 16 as it will make teenagers more frustrated if they wait till the age of 18 and with experience they will get better. Rising driving age will not make much difference as it will only irritate the teenagers who are willing to acquire driving license. College going students doesn’t like to depend on public transport as changing buses and trains tire them out instead having own vehicle gives
Welcome to Change Welcome to the 21st century where some people can’t choose between sport or protection. Should gun control be set in the United States? Such as in the article “10 Advantages and Disadvantages of Gun Control” it shows the court wouldn 't have to waste time on guns or in the article “Arguments for Gun Control” showing that many mentally unstable people die each year. Found in the article “The Pros and Cons of Gun Control” it shows how gun cultural will be wiped completely away. Gun violence occurs based on the unstable people in control of the gun not the gun itself.
By raising the driving age to eighteen, it would give these teens more time to mature before getting behind the wheel. For the safety of our teens we need to raise the unrestricted legal driving age to eighteen years
Often is the case where these problems turn out to be fatal. So the clear answer to solving these issues is to remove the human element, without humans roads would be a safer place. At least that is the concept behind driver-less or self-driving cars. Google is one of the companies leading the charge against this problem.
Most teenagers look forward to getting their license and permit to be able to get behind the wheel of a car and drive without parents. The problem with this is many teenagers take advantage of that privilege and become reckless drivers. The government has put laws in place which prevents teenagers from driving alone for the first year and keeps laws in place so teenagers can’t abuse there laws. Meanwhile, many adults still argue the safety on the road even with restrictions in place. These laws are here to keep everyone on the road safe not only the new drivers.
This would also impair their organization and planning capabilities and may even lead to depression and suicide. The MLDA should not be lowered due to the responsibility required to an individual and others. Lowering the MLDA would lead to more use of illicit drugs among the persons between 18 and 21 years old. It follows that the younger a person starts to engage in alcohol, the higher the chances of using other illicit drugs. Moreover, when the drinking age was 18 years, the cases of fatal crashes caused by underage drunk drivers were twice as many as
Traffic crash rates have been inversely related with the minimum legal drinking age since the 1970’s. Studies conducted since the 1980’s analyzed how the change in the MLDA affected the outcome of total traffic crashes for youth, drinking-driving convictions, single-vehicle nighttime crash fatalities, and alcohol problems among youth. The MLDA needs to be at 21, because 67% of the studies completed have concluded that there was a significant decrease in traffic crashes and crash fatalities when the drinking age was higher. In addition, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimated that in 1987 alone, 1,071 traffic crashes were prevented because of the MLDA of 21 (NHTSA 1989). Lower rates of death caused by vehicle crashes were found in states with higher MLDA’s throughout these various studies, and a 16% decrease in vandalism rates were observed in 4 states that raised their MLDA.
My third opinion is because they go over the speed limit. Even though parents and others try to make their kids realize that they don’t need to drive, but they do anyway. The parents just want their kids safe so I wouldn’t mind them raising the age limit. First, although it may seem cruel to teens, raising the minimum driving age would allow drivers to become better prepared. Drinking is the major problem why teens are in car accidents almost every day.
There are numerous amounts of laws in the United States that state vital information about the rules and regulations citizens of the United States must obey. One law in particular has prompted disagreement in both adults and teens, and that is whether or not the current teen driving age should be changed. Although there are multiple understandable reasons for why the current driving age should remain self same, the reality is it should be adapted. The legal driving age should be changed because it allows teens to master the ability to drive correctly and safely by having additional time to gain experience. In fact, it will let teens have more time to reach maturity and understand the responsibilities of driving.
Because of safety concerns, many states have increased the age at which teens can begin to drive. Virginia’s state legislature is considering raising the minimum driving age from 16 to 18. I believe that the minimum age of drivers should not be changed. If Virginia’s legislature changes this law, it will cause problems. I believe that the age of driver’s license requirements should not be raised because the teenager will not have to rely on their parents to drive them wherever they need to be, it will give them experience, and it will teach them to be responsible.