Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

1430 Words6 Pages

The right to keep and bear weapons is protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is a part of the country's Bill of Rights. According to the amendment, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be violated since the security of a free state depends on a well-regulated militia. This means that Americans have the right to carry guns when doing so is reasonable and necessary for their safety. Over the years, the Second Amendment has been debated and has grown to be quite contentious for a variety of reasons. It is regarded as one of the most significant articles in the Constitution since it gives American individuals a way to defend themselves. The Second Amendment is crucial to the security of the …show more content…

"The residents of the United Mexican States have the right to own guns within their domicile, for their protection and lawful defense," reads Article 10 of the Mexican Constitution. Similar to our second amendment, it grants us the freedom to defend ourselves in situations where our government is powerless to do so. We have the right to organize a militia for defense under the Second Amendment. Militias are utilized to uphold our constitutional rights, our security, and our way of life. If the government won't defend us from attacks from outside and inside, the second amendment will. According to Thomas Jefferson, “a well-organized and armed militia is the finest form of security for a people who are free and intend to stay that way” (Jefferson 19). This amply demonstrates the need for the second amendment as protection if we are to maintain our freedom. According to U.S. Department of Justice, "The second amendment will protect us against attacks from the outside and within if the government won't. Thomas Jefferson believed that the best kind of security for a people who are free and wish to remain that way is a well-organized and armed militia. This clearly shows how important the second amendment is to protecting us and preserving our freedom” (Chan 19). This implies how the Second Amendement guarantees the basic freedom "to keep and bear weapons." This assurance was …show more content…

This is due to the fact that hunting for food has a long history in American culture and has been recognized as a legal activity by the Supreme Court. The court determined in the case of United States v. Miller (1939) that the Second Amendment does not protect weapons that have no rational connection to the maintenance or effectiveness of a well-managed militia. However, it also agreed that the amendment provides protection for hunting firearms like shotguns. In addition, the Supreme Court ruled in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) that a person's right to own weapons for legal purposes is protected by the Second Amendment including hunting. Therefore, it may be said that the Second Amendment allows Americans to engage in food hunting as long as they are doing so with legal weapons and for legal reasons. (District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008); United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)) “Civil Disobedience" is a philosophical essay that focuses on the idea of nonviolent resistance to unjust laws and government actions written by Henry Thoreau. An important quote from his writing is, "If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law" (Thoreau 13). This quote emphasizes how important it is to stand up for one's values, even if

Open Document