Lawmakers in Vermont approved the measurement of gun control by reducing magazine sizes for rifles. Because of this action protesters held a protest outside the Montpelier state capitol. They handed out 30 round rifle magazines, not approved my Vermont lawmakers, to boost enthusiasm at the protest. They did this to take a stab at Phil Scott because he will sign the law to reducing the magazine size down to 10 rounds. He is also wanting to raise the age to purchase a gun to 21 years old and ban bump stocks which allow weapons in semi-automatic to fire in more of a rapid way. Residents in Vermont are aloud to keep already owned 30 round magazines. So residents are trying to obtain as many 30 round magazines as possible before the law is signed. The person that shipped these 1,200 rifle magazines was Rob Curtis. He shipped them overnight to the Vermont rally and …show more content…
In the Bill of Rights I am using the Second Amendment because that is the right to bear arms. This relates because back when this amendment was passed the Government realized that people need arms to protect themselves and to hunt. Know we are fighting to keep these arms just like how the colonies had to fight to get this amendment passed. This amendment was passed so that people could protect themselves from harm and danger. This amendment should not be tampered with because people need these guns for uses that benefit us. These people have the right to protest against this just like the colonies did back then to make sure they show that they want this amendment in the rights of an American citizen.They put this amendment in to protect our gun rights so they should not be able take this right away. But another amendment comes into play of the fight against gun rights in stats. The tenth amendment is states rights which allows states to nullify a law if it seems unconstitutional. This might be what Vermont is doing slowly to cancel out gun rights for
The thought process behind this is that it will help prevent shootings and keep criminals and mentally ill people from getting guns. Other people want to maintain this right and not be limited. They think that having guns will allow them to protect themselves from criminals and the rise of a tyrannical government. The Second Amendment was adopted into the United States Constitution on December 15, 1791, along with the other amendments in the Bill of
Opposers of Proposition 63 say that the gun control measure will create new, unnecessary restrictions on bullet sharing. These people believe that the proposition will limit who a normal, law-abiding citizen can share their bullets with. According to the email blasts of the Firearm Policy Coalition, Proposition 63 will not only decrease ammunition sales, but also “criminalize the sharing of bullets between hunting and shooting partners” (Nichols). Another
The topic of gun control and firearm regulation has been subject to heated debate for a long while. Both sides have potent arguments, however the core of this issue ultimately boils down to the constitution itself. More specifically the second amendment. This argument quickly becomes quite complicated because gun control and firearm regulation concerns not only the right of citizens, but more importantly the safety of citizens. The second amendment helps to guarantee an imperative right belonging to all citizens.
Today I will be talking about one of the Amendments that I choose and it was the second amendment. The second amendment is “The Right To Keep and Bear Arms” I will give you three reasons on this to make you choose that there should be the second amendment. My reasons are self defense,hunting and practicing. Let 's start with my first reason Self Defense. What I mean by this is that you can defend yourself if you need to in a bad situation.
The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Us americans don't need to “bear arms.” Some may say that many people use them to hunt but there are many other weapons you can use to hunt with as well as protecting yourself from danger. By having the second amendment, it gives criminals the right to go out and harm people, whether it be a family member, friend, someone you walk past. Statistics say that “The U.S. has an estimated 283 million guns in civilian hands.
First, the second amendment gives me the right to defend myself. I feel safer owning a gun because if someone comes to get me, I can shoot at them. I live up in the woods and there are wild animals that could get to me or
The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.
The second amendment states that people have a right to bear arms under a well-regulated militia. This amendment was added to the Bill of Rights because the Americans had just finished fighting The American Revolution with the British government for independence-- Gun control by the British was one of the catalysts of this war. With the revolution fresh in mind, the Americans had registered that there was a need to unite and form a union; however, some Americans felt that a union could result in something similar to the tyranny that the British had imposed on them. They were hesitant of placing the power on a small handful of people-- The second amendment helped take some power from the government and give it to the people.
The Second Amendment protects the right of people to keep and bear arms. This amendment was a controversial among different people in the government. It was between letting the people keep their weapons or to not let the people keep their weapons. This amendment was important to the framers of the Constitution because it provided the country with a well-regulated militia. The Second Amendment states "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The Second Amendment says, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun rights has become the subject of intense political, social, and cultural battles for much of the last century. The pro-gun right side has asserted that the right to arms was absolute, and that any gun control laws infringed that right (Kopel, 2013). This right has been supported by the Supreme Court who has reinforced what has become the American consensus that the Second Amendment allows the right to keep and bear arms, especially for self-defense, and that it is a fundamental individual
The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights is the right to bear arms, which gives American citizens a constitutional right to own and purchase guns. It states, "A well-regulated
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
Since the begining of America, the Founding Fathers wrote the strong-standing Bill of Rights with amendments to protect the country that had just recently won their freedom, but one amendment has been the top theme of controversies for centuries. Gun laws offend the Bill of Rights in so many ways and they prove ineffective. Gun Laws are relevant due to thousands of deaths and self-protection. The argument goes on but without guns there is militia, one of the main intents of the Second Amendment. These simple rules can reduce deaths, proven by millions of influential people.
And here come the comments screaming " Look what happened in Oregon. " As if owning a gun and supporting the SA makes me share the evil of madmen.” While another viewer went on to write “I'm not for the proliferation of guns, I'm also not for strict gun control. It's too late for gun control in the USA, the cats out of the bag. Too many guns in circulation & we're not gonna go door to door seizing guns.