Introduction
With aging and disease comes many complications; the body is pushed to mental, physical, and emotional extremes. Many people experience pain and suffering with these changes and struggle to cope with it. Since the process of aging and the course of disease is a natural process it becomes a challenge to decide when enough is enough. Is palliative care enough or should assisted suicide be considered? Whether it be from the natural aging progression or onset of disease, the process of dying is inevitable and brings a variety of complications; therefore assisted suicide should be of consideration. Since assisted suicide is not a widely accepted option for end of life situations it is very controversial. People may argue that, assisted
…show more content…
Dying patients have the right to decide if they want to receive medical care such as whether or not to pursue treatment for a serious disease or whether they want to undergo lifesaving procedures; therefore they should be able to decide about medical assisted suicide. Another circumstance when a patient makes a decision regarding life or death for themselves is a Do Not Resuscitate order. The order is filed in order determine a care plan in case of emergency. This is a decision made by the patient for the patient, very similar to how assisted suicide works. A patient also sets up a living wills and advance directives before dying about other circumstances and how to handle them when death approaches. Advance directives help you plan out choices you make regarding care for end of life before the time comes. Patients have so many choices regarding death and dying, assisted suicide needs to be a choice they …show more content…
Many people are under the impression that assisted suicide gives medical professionals too much power and creates opportunities for abuse. In a hospice setting medical experts have an equal opportunity for abuse. Pushing morphine around the clock, continuously, until respiratory efforts fail is a similar concept that will eventually result in death. Everything in the world, with the medical world as no exception, has the potential for abuse. Just because there is a chance of something negative happening should not outweigh all of the ways that assisted suicide can help people in this scary stage of their lives. It is a very complicated situation and it is extremely hard to determine what is right and wrong but, it is a much deeper concept than just assisted
Doctors should have responsibility of helping the ill patients to get better physically. Physicians are the icon of peace and generous within the society since their job is to solve the physical pain of the patients. In allowing physician-assisted suicide, the duty of physicians is misread. Society and law are saying that physician’s duty is no longer helping patients, but they can also easily put an end to patient’s life. In the New York Times article “Doctor-Assisted Suicide Is Unethical and Dangerous”, Ira Byock states, “people who are poor, or old and frail, or simply have long-standing disabilities, may worry that when they become acutely ill, doctors might see their lives as not worth living and compassionately act to end their supposed misery”.
Not only will it help patients, who are suffering, but it will also help to relieve some of the stress and pain of loved ones that are taking care of them. Not only will patients have the choice of choosing assisted suicide, but their loved ones may be responsible for this as well. Patients who are incapable to speak for themselves living through unbearable pain, or even the ones who are on life support do not have the opportunity to speak for themselves. Many patients may have a Will written with a name of a relative to make their end of life decision.
Current Issues Surrounding Death A hot topic in today’s media and in discussion is the idea of physician assisted suicide and end of life care. There are several legal, ethical, social, and political issues surrounding this idea, which makes it a controversial topic. This paper will discuss some of these issues and explore the idea of physician assisted suicide and end of life care in more detail. Physician assisted suicide is defined as, “suicide by a patient facilitated by means or information (as a drug prescription or indication of the lethal dosage) provided by a physician who is aware of how the patient intends to use such means or information (Merriam-Webster, 2015).
Would you want to live the rest of your life in extreme physical pain? The discussion of Assisted Suicide has sparked controversy around the world for decades. Assisted Suicide is when nurses end a patient’s life when they are suffering greatly from a mental or physical illness. Assisted Suicide has a dark history regarding who they killed and for what reason, and that needs to change with regulations. I believe that Assisted Suicide should remain in practice for those who are in constant physical pain due to chronic illnesses and diseases.
Physician assisted suicide is when a physician provides the means required to commit suicide, including prescribing lethal amounts of harmful drugs to a patient. In the United States alone, there is great controversy about physician assisted suicide. The issue is whether physician assisted suicide is murder or an act of sympathy for the patient. The main point is that terminally ill patients should have a right to physician assisted suicide if it meets their needs and is done properly. Physician assisted suicide is an appropriate action for the terminally ill that want to end their life in peace before it ends at the hands of the terminal disease.
Assisted suicide is euthanasia of a suffering, severely ill patient performed by a doctor . This is a very controversial topic in today's time. People argue that if someone is terminally ill then they should have the option to end their lives. On the other side of the argument people think the person making the decision might not be in the right state of mind or mentally stable. I view this as a logical way of taking someone out of their sufferance.
Generally, the process of assisted suicide is done by a physician for those patients that are fatally ill with zero chance of possibilities to making a recovery and with great likely hood their death will be drawn out by the hospitals machines and more then likely
Although Assisted suicide is illegal in most states, it is well known to help many patients, however opposing sides sees the impact it has on family and medical physicians who think it is unethical. Physician assisted suicide is for those who have life threatning illnesses and who do not have much time to live. However, from a legal standpoint, Physician assisted suicide does not include active
Generally, people advocating on this side discuss the possible unintended consequences that will occur if physician-assisted suicide is legalized on a large scale. One of these possible unintended consequences is the illegal distribution of lethal medicines. People against assisted suicide argue that since the patient has to administer the drugs themselves, and since they may do this outside of a supervised medical office, that the drugs could end up in the wrong hands. Once they are in the wrong hands, there is no telling what it will be used for, these people argue. Another unintended consequence that adversaries of physician-assisted suicide warn against is elder abuse, where a corrupt doctor may persuade or even force an elderly person to take the lethal dose of medicine against their
Patients have the right to the kind of treatment they want. 3) Conclusion a) Physician assisted suicide can help treat the terminally ill how they would like to be treated. b) The long history of assisted suicide speaks for itself in the matter of if it should be legal or
Many people think that there are too many problems with physician assisted suicide. Physician assisted suicide is a procedure that allows physicians to prescribe their patients a lethal medication that they can inject themselves with in order to die on their own terms. There are specific requirements that the patients must meet in order to receive this medication. Physician assisted suicide is only for patients that have life threatening illnesses and do not have much time left to live. It is legal in numerous places around the world including certain places in the United States.
In the defense of Physician Assisted Suicide, a wide publicly talked about topic, it should be a choice every terminally ill patient receives. Physician Assisted suicide is when a patient is terminally ill and has no chances of recovering. The patient themselves can make the decision, with the help from their physician, to get lethally injected and end their life reducing and ending the pain. In America each state has a little over 3,000 patients that are terminally ill contact an advocacy group known as the Compassion and Choices to try to reduce end-of- life suffering and perhaps hasten their death. Physician Assisted Suicide shouldn’t be looked at as suicide, but as ending the pain and suffering from an individual whose life is going to be taken away anyway.
The dying patient no longer has quality of life, they have lost their independence, are lonely, are forced to endure inevitable pain, are publicly humiliated, are suffering immensely, and are forced to watch their loved ones grieve because of them. It is an innate Constitutional Right to choose how to die, since we all will die. There comes a point when the poking and prodding becomes too much, when the patient wants to just die in silence in the loving arms of their
The Right to Die has been taking effect in many states and is rapidly spreading around the world. Patients who have life threatening conditions usually choose to die quickly with the help of their physicians. Many people question this right because of its inhumane authority. Euthanasia or assisted suicide are done by physicians to end the lives of their patients only in Oregon, Washington, Vermont, Montana, New Mexico and soon California that have the Right to Die so that patients don’t have to live with depression, cancer and immobility would rather die quick in peace.
There are multiple factors correlated with each individual case. An individual with a terminal illness with no cure should be able to consent to the ability to end their life on their own means. “Patient centered deontology is the best ethical framework for evaluating the moral permissibility of euthanasia. It allows Patient autonomy and making judgments based on the act and agent themselves rather than the consequences” (Nathan, 2015). There is no difference in active and passive euthanasia, they are morally permissible, and that the distinction between active and passive euthanasia, in itself, actually diminishes the autonomy of the patient because this deems the agent as external in contrast to the patient acting as the