ipl-logo

What Is Spinoza's View Of Substance Dualism

1744 Words7 Pages

Baruch Spinoza’s geometric structured view on the universe, and everything in general, is beautifully broken down for present and future thinkers to ponder in his work, Ethics. Although complex at times, his method of demonstrating each discoveries of proved proposition aids readers to conceptual God-Nature. At the base of these propositions are definitions and axioms (truths) Spinoza accounts as certain truths and are critical to understanding God-Nature (substance). I will here provide an account of Spinoza’s substance monism and attribute pluralism, along with strengths and weaknesses in his arguments for this picture of reality. This essay will argue that Spinoza’s claims are successfully supported in a manner that effectively utilizes …show more content…

Substance dualism is a particular philosophy which Descartes takes a stance on. Descartes argues that two substances (mind and body) exist separately and it is evident from great distinction between the two. Spinoza agrees mind and body are different, but not to the extent that they are two separate substances (Def. 3). He explains that if mind and body were two existing substances, they would be so different that they could not interact (Prop.2). This interaction of thought to body or vise versa couldn 't exist since no common ground resides. But may believe even Descartes isn’t exactly clear on the inner working of the relationship (Robinson, Howard). Spinoza’s substance monism cleverly dissolves this issue by labeling mind (thought) and body (extension) as attributes to a common and singular substance. Other substance pluralist philosophies are also denied when we truly capture the infinite extent of …show more content…

Arguing his terms and ideas as unclear and vague will prove this theory weak in the sense that Spinoza isn’t entirely confident on what substance and the other elements are. By being general, Spinoza leaves room for ‘error’ and this can be considered cowardice. Empiricist John Locke targets this reliance of innate ideas as one that rationalist, like Spinoza when using to explain substance. (QUOTE) Locke agrees all the universe is dependent on this idea of substance; substance which comes from the latin of Substantia, which means ‘one which is relied upon’. But the rationalist 's claim to know this, substance, without explanation of its workings is a flaw Locke argues lies in rationalistic thought. Indeed substance helps hold the universe together and is an unavoidable idea which we can’t do without, but to say we innately know the complex mysteries of substance cohesion (including attribute, mode, etc.) isn’t justifiable according to

Show More
Related
509 Words | 3 Pages

John Locke's Ideas about Lord of the Flies Nathaniel Cundy “Which is better--to have laws and agree, or to hunt and kill?” ― William Golding, Lord of the Flies. The Lord of the Flies is about a group of boys who get stuck on an island in the middle of nowhere and try to form a government with horrible consequences. John Locke(1632-1704) is a philosopher who is well known for his views on state of nature, laws of nature, social contract, and natural law. If John Locke saw what was happening on the island, he would have been aghast because of the state of nature, violation of rights, and the social contract.

Read More
105 Words | 1 Pages

Substance dualism is the false theory that persons and bodies are distinct from each other. More definitively, according to the proponents of substance dualism: the person is you – a conscience, and the body is also you, but the body itself is also an entirely separate entity from your conscience. But why is this theory wrong? Substance dualism is false because if I am a nonphysical entity, then I have no spatial location; if I have no spatial location, then how can I exert force upon the world around me? The breakdown of the argument that disproves the theory of substance dualism is as follows:

Read More
2161 Words | 9 Pages

The Trinities of Power and Modification re-expresses Substance within itself through production of natura naturata (attributes and modes). Spinoza continues to build his proof of God’s necessary existence to prove that God is causa sui, a self-caused immutable being on Descartes’ absurd argument of quantities of reality. The Cartesian hypothesis claims that if I have the power to create myself, it would be much easier to give myself properties of which I have an idea; and it would be less difficult to preserve myself than to create myself. What can do more can do less. So if it is more difficult to create or preserve a substance than to create its properties, substance would have more reality than the properties themselves.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

PHIL 3022001 SPRING 2018 RESPONSES #8 1. What does Locke say that our ideas of substances ARE? What are the three sorts of ideas from which they are made? What of the idea of substance in general?

Read More
252 Words | 2 Pages

Ryle is a philosopher who does not believe in substance dualism by saying that substance dualism is a category mistake. Ryle states that Descartes's belief that he is an immaterial substance and his essential property is thought is flawed as the mind is not something that can be categorized with an immaterial substance and should be categorized alongside the brain. Ryle’s belief is called behaviorism and says that all mental events can be reduced to descriptions of behavior. For example behaviorism believes that mentally when you believe it will rain your behavior explains that by taking your umbrella. The major fault with behaviorism is that you believe it's going to rain and you take your umbrella but simply what if you were simply thinking

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

In the sixth meditation, Descartes postulates that there exists a fundamental difference in the natures of both mind and body which necessitates that they be considered as separate and distinct entities, rather than one stemming from the other or vice versa. This essay will endeavour to provide a critical objection to Descartes’ conception of the nature of mind and body and will then further commit to elucidating a suitably Cartesian-esque response to the same objection. (Descartes,1641) In the sixth meditation Descartes approaches this point of dualism between mind and matter, which would become a famous axiom in his body of philosophical work, in numerous ways. To wit Descartes postulates that he has clear and distinct perceptions of both

Read More
300 Words | 2 Pages

Descartes addresses the faculty of sacred theology in the preface to his Meditations. Although there are some elements of the Mediations that this faculty would accept as true, Descartes’ push towards cartesian metaphysics, would be met with resistance. One of the main proponents of Cartesianism that the council would not support is its dualism. Descartes’ acknowledges the existence of bot a body and a soul, however, he believes that an individual’s true essence is held within the soul. The implications of this, is that once an individual experiences bodily death they will still exist in full as their soul.

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

The human mind’s ability and innate desire to justify and explain the world and its phenomena has led to some of the most significant and world-altering discoveries and inventions, illustrated throughout the renaissance, enlightenment, scientific revolution, and industrial revolution. Logical pursuits comprise a significant capstone of human nature and progress. However, according to Rudolf Otto in The Idea of the Holy, these tendencies have created different dimensions of religion; the rational and non-rational, with the latter often times overlooked. The most significant difference between the rational and non-rational aspects of religion deal with their respective emphasis on reason and feeling. Rudolph Otto prioritizes the non-rational as offering a truer understanding of religion because he claims the core of all religious life revolves around experiences and feeling, not simply rational thought.

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

1a. To Locke, substance is something that possesses the primary quality of an object that truly exists in bodies themselves in reality. Though if told to describe “substance”, it is something Locke cannot describe and is something “we know not what.” Locke stated that there must be substances underlying everything we sense and experience, because he believed that substance contained the power to give regularity and consistency to our ideas, and constitute the object of our sensitive knowledge. He backs this up by saying that for something to have an idea/quality (effect) there must be substance (cause), much like Thomas Aquinas and his theory of motion.

Read More
277 Words | 2 Pages

Lucretius On the Nature of the Universe “On the Nature of the Universe” is a very long poem written by Lucretius in which he portrays the reality of man in a godless universe and in a way tries to make men be fearless of death. One of his principals is “that nothing ever by divine power comes from nothing,” because according to him in his philosophy as a custom they must define the matter therefore “all things are made of atoms”, he defends the idea that the world and everything contained in it is pure matter ruled by mechanistic laws which control the movements of the atoms. But if this matter fails, death is the way.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

For Descartes, the soul may be the only thing that we can be aware of; he argued that true knowledge is only gained through rational introspection and that the senses cannot be trusted. Descartes was also a mind-body dualist; because he could conceive of his mind existing without his body, he concluded that the mind must be made of an entirely different substance, a substance that thinks. Upon this foundation he claims all knowledge is built. Locke argues that innate ideas are just another name for one’s pet ideas. Locke realizes that we only know things as we experience them, we don’t know the essence of the substances that make up the world.

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

Theory of knowledge is a yield of doubt. When we seriously really know anything at all, we innate lead into test of knowing, in the hope of being capable to discriminate the trustworthy beliefs from such as are untrustworthy. Knowledge is the principal intellectual attainment studies of epistemology. Virtually all theorists agree that true belief is a necessary condition for knowledge and it was once thought that justification, when added to true belief, yield a necessary and sufficient condition for knowledge. All of us have an innate knowledge, concepts, forms, or universals that are an essential and inborn part that compose our mind.

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

Descartes and Hume. Rationalism and empiricism. Two of the most iconic philosophers who are both credited with polarizing theories, both claiming they knew the answer to the origin of knowledge and the way people comprehend knowledge. Yet, despite the many differences that conflict each other’s ideologies, they’re strikingly similar as well. In this essay I will attempt to find an understanding of both rationalism and empiricism, show the ideologies of both philosophers all whilst evaluating why one is more theory is potentially true than the other.

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

The order of each substance simply comes from the attributes or essence of god that is inevitable. However, Spinoza’s god is the cause of all the things because everything is from the divine nature. For many god is the transcendent being who made the world apparent from itself by some spontaneous act of free will, as Spinoza deny that and for him the existence of the world is mathematically very essential to exist, for him existence of world and everything is absolutely and necessarily

Read More
2194 Words | 9 Pages

This brings about a connection and unity among the transcendental ideas that allows one’s reason to combine all its modes of knowledge in a

Read More

More about What Is Spinoza's View Of Substance Dualism

Related Topics

Open Document