Colin Kaepernick's Argument Analysis

516 Words3 Pages
The current debate over kneeling or sitting in protest during the National anthem ignited by Colin Kaepernick in 2016 has escalated to become a nationally divisive issue. Colin Kaepernick, quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers refuse to stand during “the Star Spangled Banner” Aug. 2016, to protest against racial injustice and police brutality in the United States. These athletics that chose not to stand for the national anthem because there was a message they wanted to send. Needless to say, an individual has a right to believe as they so choose. Kaepernick along with many others feel that not standing for the national anthem is a peaceful way to protest and release their feelings. People fail to comprehend, the words to the Star Spangled Banner has a meaning, which is…show more content…
The argument of the pros was most convincing effulgent facts stated (Paul, et al., 2017).Colin Kaepernick chooses to do what he felt was the ethical thing to do. Even though he is being criticized for his actions, they have caused no bloodshed, no innocent killing, and no racial slurs. According to Jabrill Peppers, “there are a lot of racial and social injustices in the world that are going on right now, we decided to take a knee and pray for the people who have been affected”, (Pros Cons. org 2017). Consequently, after evaluating the situation, either Kaepernick will stand for what he believes and feel is right which is the United States is not living up to its idea of freedom, liberty, and justice for all. Although there are some people that still have that slave mentality and refuse to treat people of color with the same respect. Therefore, probable cause shows that refusing to stand for the National Anthem is appropriate and justified because of the First Amendment an individual will stand for what he feels is right or fall for
Open Document