Two of the most significant individuals are Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. During the American civil rights movement. Although the two leaders had distinct ways of combating structural racism and injustice, King's theory ultimately prevails over Malcolm X's. The references discussed why King's perspective is superior to Malcolm X's, especially in terms of bringing about long-lasting change. The two leaders' approaches to nonviolence were one of their most significant distinctions.
Malcolm X believed in using force to struggle against oppression, unlike King, who supported nonviolent resistance. Study results, however, imply that King's nonviolent strategy was more successful in bringing about long-lasting change. In contrast to violent resistance, nonviolent
…show more content…
This is due to the fact that, while violence can be used to justify additional tyranny, nonviolent resistance appeals to the moral conscience of both those in authority and the general public. This was acknowledged by King, who wrote in his well-known Letter from Birmingham Jail that "violence, as a way of achieving racial justice, is both impractical and immoral" (Morant, 2019). Therefore, King's adherence to nonviolence was not only a moral decision but also a calculated one. King's emphasis on coalition-building distinguishes his philosophy from Malcolm X's in another way. King understood that in order to make a significant change, it would have the support of not only Black Americans but also White Americans and other marginalized groups. Malcolm X, on the other hand, had a more exclusive stance, concentrating only on the empowerment of Black Americans. For Black Americans who
This book brings together some of the best primary sources on Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X that relate to what I’ve learned in history class. Through their writings and speeches, I appreciate the roles they played in the freedom crusade of the 1950s and 1960s. It is a good summary of its essential teachings that give me insight into their individual styles and personalities. The book is not one that tries to force ideas or a religion on the reader but instead offers new insight on two of these most important civil rights leaders of the century. It is a valuable effort that helps me both within and beyond the classroom, which focuses on the crucial years in the lives of quintessentially human
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr's techniques are very different, but similar. They both want the same thing: negro companies. The way they carry out this, though, is different. Malcolm wants to make his own negro company. Furthermore, Martin wants to protest peacefully by banning products from companies that do not hire negroes.
King believed in a nonviolent approach to the Civil Rights movement, Malcolm X demonstrated a different means to addressing the movement. Malcolm X proclaim that the best way to understand and in order to obtain the same overall goal (in this case equality) one has to speak the same language as the other person in context. He proclaims this through the example of guns within the document and that if a person speaks this way, then this is the best way to answer their statement. The same aspects occurred within a duel in the old west. If a person was called out they would answer accordingly or be branded a coward for the rest of their life.
However, the nonviolent protests and endeavors employed by African Americans in the 1960s caught the attention of individuals nationwide. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s refusal to react violently showed white Americans that African Americans were not subhuman creatures prone to violence, but humans capable of intelligence and reason. African Americans were not animals capable of only slave labor, but individuals deserving of the rights promised by the Constitution of the United States to all American citizens. In addition to the aforementioned pieces of evidence, Martin Luther King believed that violence would never lead to peace, only to more violence. He was firm and justified in his affirmation that “This is the ultimate weakness of violence: It multiplies evil and violence in the universe.
Despite this opposition, King's message of nonviolent resistance prevailed and became a blueprint for social change in the United States. As shown from current day, nonviolent resistance was more effective in bringing about lasting social change. His stance was targeted towards the hypocrisy of White Americans, who did not have a significant opinion on the civil rights movement, and the oppressed Black Americans. His argument was able to create a disruption in the status quo and force those in power to address the underlying issue. However, it was also during this period King’s ideas were often questioned by those following behind him as many protestors questioned if such passive disobedience would achieve their goals of
in the 1950s through the 1960s, there was social and political injustice. There was also racism, but leaders such as Dr. King and Malcome X were both heroes in the civil rights movement. Malcolm X is the leader whose methods and messages work the best. Malcolm X was a civil rights leader that was good at his job and took it very seriously; he did not like to play games and was straight to the point. In paragraph one, Malcolm X states, " I'm not here to discuss anything we differ about because it time for us to submerge our differences.
King preached non violence no matter what the circumstances are. Malcolm X claimed violence was an appropriate action to free the black community(Document 9). On January 18, 1965, Malcolm X was interviewed in “The Young Socialist” where he stated his idea that all white men are violent and that is their only language. Therefore, in order for black people to gain their equality, they had to speak in the white man language of violence as well.
The fight for equality has been a long and complicated battle. Many people believe that Martin Luther King, Jr. was correct in his approach, but others believe that Malcolm X’s approach was best. Malcolm X believed in the goal of black people separating completely from white people using the method of violence in self-defense. Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in the method of reaching equality through desegregation using the method of nonviolent resistance. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in very different viewpoints regarding the solution to the needs of and problems facing the African-American community in the 1960s, but King’s approach was best.
Malcolm X was a civil rights leader who advocated for black empowerment and the use of force in achieving equal rights. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a civil rights leader who advocated for nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience. Both men were influential in the civil rights movement, but Malcolm X was more effective in achieving black empowerment. Malcolm X believed that blacks should be self-reliant and independent from whites. He advocated for black businesses and black economic empowerment.
Throughout America’s history there has been many influential leaders who have strived to make a difference. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both became key figures during the Civil Rights Movement. Each of their religious beliefs influenced them to stand up and demand a change. Although these two men differed in religious beliefs, their faith helped guide them into the strong, substantial leaders they became. Martin Luther King Jr. was a man of faith.
Martin Luther King Junior and Malcolm X were two leaders of their time that were committed to the struggle for civil rights and equality for black people. Despite their fight for the same struggle, they had different ideas about the best way to achieve these goals. Martin Luther King Junior believed that nonviolent protest methods were crucial in the pursuit of equality for all people in order to build a beloved community. King offers the best solution to the needs and problems of the black community over Malcolm X. Malcolm X advocated for violent protest methods whereas King’s means of non-violent resistance was the more effective way to bring about change all while promoting love and reconciliation against forces of evil. Martin Luther
Malcolm X gave black America a face during the situation, as he saw his people as an independent and self-sustaining community when separated from any sort of discrimination. He embraced his black culture and history, encouraging young black people to take pride in their heritage and to reject the white standards of beauty and success that had been imposed upon them. This was something that Martin Luther King never had a thought on doing. This focus on cultural and historical identity was a significant departure from the assimilationist policies of the mainstream civil rights movement. As stated in paragraph #2, Martin Luther King’s protests were being put to an end in white communities because those who did not approve of black rights utilized fear tactics to scare the protestors away from their posts.
MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for
Malcolm has more justification for the black rights movement than just arguing about the variable of time, he also states that without African Americans the United States wouldn 't have its riches or status. This is all based on the idea that without slavery and generations of black workers, America would never have evolved into the prosperous
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.