Two of the most significant individuals are Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. During the American civil rights movement. Although the two leaders had distinct ways of combating structural racism and injustice, King's theory ultimately prevails over Malcolm X's. The references discussed why King's perspective is superior to Malcolm X's, especially in terms of bringing about long-lasting change. The two leaders' approaches to nonviolence were one of their most significant distinctions. Malcolm X believed in using force to struggle against oppression, unlike King, who supported nonviolent resistance. Study results, however, imply that King's nonviolent strategy was more successful in bringing about long-lasting change. In contrast to violent resistance, nonviolent …show more content…
This is due to the fact that, while violence can be used to justify additional tyranny, nonviolent resistance appeals to the moral conscience of both those in authority and the general public. This was acknowledged by King, who wrote in his well-known Letter from Birmingham Jail that "violence, as a way of achieving racial justice, is both impractical and immoral" (Morant, 2019). Therefore, King's adherence to nonviolence was not only a moral decision but also a calculated one. King's emphasis on coalition-building distinguishes his philosophy from Malcolm X's in another way. King understood that in order to make a significant change, it would have the support of not only Black Americans but also White Americans and other marginalized groups. Malcolm X, on the other hand, had a more exclusive stance, concentrating only on the empowerment of Black Americans. For Black Americans who
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr's techniques are very different, but similar. They both want the same thing: negro companies. The way they carry out this, though, is different. Malcolm wants to make his own negro company. Furthermore, Martin wants to protest peacefully by banning products from companies that do not hire negroes.
In the pursuit of equality during the Civil Rights Movement, two main ideologies emerged: those of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X. These two men’s philosophies are usually viewed as complete contradictories. Both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King hold the same end goal of rights for African Americans; however, their methods for achieving that goal differ. Malcolm maintained a more violent approach whereas King deemed that the best way to achieve equality was through nonviolent and peaceful practices. Additionally, Malcolm believed in the separatism of African American and white cultures, in contrast to King’s belief in the integration of black and white cultures.
While controversial, these ideas were deeply principled and reflected Malcolm X's commitment to defending the rights and dignity of African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr., on the other hand, believed in the power of nonviolent resistance as a means of achieving civil rights. King understood that nonviolent resistance could be a slow and difficult process, requiring patience, strategy, and a strong commitment to nonviolence. Which causes him to fall into pragmatism. Iy contrast, Malcolm X's belief of self-defense and the use of violence when necessary was often seen as more confrontational and less pragmatic.
in the 1950s through the 1960s, there was social and political injustice. There was also racism, but leaders such as Dr. King and Malcome X were both heroes in the civil rights movement. Malcolm X is the leader whose methods and messages work the best. Malcolm X was a civil rights leader that was good at his job and took it very seriously; he did not like to play games and was straight to the point. In paragraph one, Malcolm X states, " I'm not here to discuss anything we differ about because it time for us to submerge our differences.
King preached non violence no matter what the circumstances are. Malcolm X claimed violence was an appropriate action to free the black community(Document 9). On January 18, 1965, Malcolm X was interviewed in “The Young Socialist” where he stated his idea that all white men are violent and that is their only language. Therefore, in order for black people to gain their equality, they had to speak in the white man language of violence as well.
The fight for equality has been a long and complicated battle. Many people believe that Martin Luther King, Jr. was correct in his approach, but others believe that Malcolm X’s approach was best. Malcolm X believed in the goal of black people separating completely from white people using the method of violence in self-defense. Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in the method of reaching equality through desegregation using the method of nonviolent resistance. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in very different viewpoints regarding the solution to the needs of and problems facing the African-American community in the 1960s, but King’s approach was best.
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr were undeniably large figureheads in the push for equal and better rights for African Americans in the 1960s. However they were not both civil rights leaders as Malcolm X goes to great lengths to clarify he is not advocating for civil rights but human rights. Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X wanted freedom for themselves and other African-Americans however had different opinions on how to obtain that goal. Malcolm X followed a philosophy Karl Marx, and Martin Luther King followed a philosophy closer to John Locke.
Malcolm X was a civil rights leader who advocated for black empowerment and the use of force in achieving equal rights. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a civil rights leader who advocated for nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience. Both men were influential in the civil rights movement, but Malcolm X was more effective in achieving black empowerment. Malcolm X believed that blacks should be self-reliant and independent from whites. He advocated for black businesses and black economic empowerment.
Throughout America’s history there has been many influential leaders who have strived to make a difference. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both became key figures during the Civil Rights Movement. Each of their religious beliefs influenced them to stand up and demand a change. Although these two men differed in religious beliefs, their faith helped guide them into the strong, substantial leaders they became. Martin Luther King Jr. was a man of faith.
Martin Luther King Junior and Malcolm X were two leaders of their time that were committed to the struggle for civil rights and equality for black people. Despite their fight for the same struggle, they had different ideas about the best way to achieve these goals. Martin Luther King Junior believed that nonviolent protest methods were crucial in the pursuit of equality for all people in order to build a beloved community. King offers the best solution to the needs and problems of the black community over Malcolm X. Malcolm X advocated for violent protest methods whereas King’s means of non-violent resistance was the more effective way to bring about change all while promoting love and reconciliation against forces of evil. Martin Luther
The Civil Rights movement led to the emergence of two historical African-American figures during the 1960s, being Martin Luther King Jr. and his rival, Malcolm X. While both men shared a common goal of achieving civil rights for their people, their approaches to reaching this goal were vastly different. Malcolm X advocated for a more confrontational and violent approach, while Martin Luther King Jr. believed in peace and nonviolence. Differing factors such as speed, duration, and tactics separated the two methods from one another. Both were effective in their own ways, though it’s clear that Malcolm X had the stronger approach to the matter. To start things off, it’s clear that Malcolm X’s approach would provide quicker results.
One reason that people believe in Malcolm X’s greater leadership is his opposition to non-violent strategies as a way to make a change. Malcolm X pushed his fellow Black Americans to “protect themselves against white aggression by any means necessary” (Malcolm X). While having a strong public following that advocated self-defense, this leader demanded change in ways different from Martin Luther King. The audience in support of Malcolm X believed aggression was the best way to achieve a goal and praised that approach to end discrimination.
In both sections of Document 2, many readers begin to realize that activists, such as King and Malcom X, wanted to make sure that Civil Rights movements was not only positive towards society, but was also handled accordingly in order for African Americans to become equal within society. However, Dr. King and Malcolm X demonstrated their difference in thoughts upon how the Civil Rights movements should be incorporated within society, especially when it came to violence. Document 2 demonstrates how both Dr. King and Malcolm X viewed their ideas of violence and how it contributed not only to their work within the movements, but also to the general historical aspect of society as we know it today. Dr King believed that the best way to contribute to the Civil Rights movement was to address the issue in a nonviolent manner. This manner included nonviolent aspects such as sit ins and marches in order to demonstrate a way of negotiating with the leaders within the world while also proclaiming the need for equality.
MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for
On the other hand, Malcolm X did make a huge impact on the civil rights movement by showing whites that