Constitutional Convention Versus The Great Compromise
In the summer of 1787, a Constitutional Convention was called to revise the Articles of Confederation. Many of the delegates intended to use this convention as a way of drafting a new constitution. The main issue discussed in the convention was representation of the states. The Articles stated that each state had a single vote in Congress, but the bigger states wanted representation based on population. James Madison then proposed the Virginia Plan, and the larger states supported his idea. However, William Paterson proposed the New Jersey plan, which received an equal amount of support from the smaller states. This conflict nearly tore the convention apart, but Roger Sherman came up with the Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise. The compromise proposed of having two houses, one of which would be based on proportional representation, and the other being of equal …show more content…
The Constitution was to be ratified by a special ratifying convention instead of the state legislature. The people fought hard for ratification of the Constitution for a long time. Those who supported the ratification were called Federalists, and those who opposed it were called Anti-Federalists. The Federalists went against the Articles of Confederation, whereas the Anti-Federalists supported a House of Representative which consisted of substantive power.
Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, whom are all Federalists, wrote The Federalist Papers - a series of essays. The essays talked about the Constitution and "defended its provision." They defended the Bill of Rights, which is the weakest point of the Constitution. Patrick Henry, an Anti-Federalist, believed that the Constitution could bring a "dangerously powerful government," so that is why he attacked the Constitution. Eventually, most of the Anti-Federalists were persuaded by the Federalists'
Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention
705 Words | 3 PagesThe Great Compromise was Roger Sherman’s plan, and was an attempt to resolve the conflicts between the smaller states and larger states, settling the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan called for a bicameral
Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons
572 Words | 3 PagesThe Federalists supported the constitution, and wanted more power to the central government. The Federalists pushed for the constitution because it would give them more power, mainly because they were the government officials, in the central government. Opposed to the constitution were the Anti-Federalists, who wanted the Bill Of Rights not the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists believed the Senate would be too powerful and they (the others/ Anti-Federalists) would be oppressed. The Anti-Federalists wanted the same power as the Federalists, and those in the government.
Constitutional Convention Dbq Essay
629 Words | 3 PagesThe first kind was mentioned by politicians Roger Sherman. and Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut. They appeared in the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia with an unpleasant manner toward the Virginia Plan and its new purpose to give more power to Congress and to reduce the states’ role in America system. These two delegates achieved considerable success in demonstrating this plan in the direction of federal principles. But in the end the powers of Congress are listed clearly, each state will be represented equally in the Senate and composed of Senators elected by the state legislatures, the president will be elected by a majority of the people and a majority of the
To What Extent Was The Constitutional Convention Of 1787
584 Words | 3 PagesThe Constitutional Convention of 1787 brought politicians from different states together in order to create a more complex and centralized form of government. The Virginia Plan was brought forward by James Madison, a representative of Virginia, who wanted to create a more centralized and powerful national government, that would benefit the larger states if it was implemented. The main political dilemma was to construct a central government that would provide the necessary national goods without interfering or endangering the power of the states. Some of the issues discussed at the Convention that were brought forward by the representatives were congressional representation, the appointment of House seats, the national assumption of state debts, the regulation of tariffs and the presidential powers, which were later on incorporated in what is known today as the Constitution.
Assess The Difference Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists
543 Words | 3 PagesThey believed that no bill of rights would be equal to no check on our government for the people. The only reason the Anti-Federalists agreed to help approve the constitution was because of the bill of rights and without the bill of rights the constitution would not have been approved. As it states in the book, “It was largely at Anti-Federalist Insistence that a bill of rights was included in the Constitution” (Sinopoli 33). They want the people to be heard and not
The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists
99 Words | 1 PagesThe Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of
Central Focus And Purpose Of The Constitutional Convention
647 Words | 3 PagesThe Virgina Plan wanted state representation based on population, while the New Jersey Plan wanted the states to have equal representation. This was resolved by the Great Compromise that created the House of Representatives (based on population) and the Senate (equal representation). The Constitution was created due to the weakness of government caused by the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists wanted the new Constitution and a stronger government. The Anti-Federlaists opposed the new constitution and didn’t want a strong central government.
Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists
642 Words | 3 PagesThey believed that the Constitution gave the government too much power and if the government had too much power then they would be back to where they started with the same monarchy as Britain. The Anti-Federalist lacked the leadership power compared to the Federalists. Some Anti-Federalist included Samuel Adams, John Hancock, and Patrick Henry. Anti-Federalists said that the new government would fall because of merchants and creditors. Anti-Federalist who opposed the Constitution believed that the Constitution failed to protect the rights of citizens and threatened liberties.
Constitutional Convention In 1787
420 Words | 2 PagesThe cause of the rebellion caused national leaders to worry about government that could not control rebellions and prevent violence. The struggles that the constitution faced was solved, by starting compromises. The first compromise was the Great Compromise written by Roger Sherman called for a bicameral legislature. This compromise was between small and large states of the colonies and combined the demands that both large and small states needed. The end result of the Great Compromise was that it resolved representation by population in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate as well.
The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention
1593 Words | 7 PagesAfter no progress of which plan to go through with, Roger Sherman came up with the Great Compromise. The compromise called for two house legislator. Members of the house of representatives or the lower house would be elected by popular vote. Members of the Senate or the upper house would be chosen by the state legislators. Each state would only have two senators no matter the size, or population of the state.
What Was The Purpose Of The Constitutional Convention Between 1786 And 1787
1104 Words | 5 PagesIt included the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive Branches. Most delegates favored this plan because their state would get more seats in the house, having more of a say. Resolving the argument, Roger Sherman came up with The Great Compromise also known as The Connecticut Plan. The government incorporated, two house legislature, containing a Senate and a House of Representatives. The senate would have an equal number of representatives from each state, which fulfilled the New Jersey Plan.
Compare And Contrast The Bill Of Rights And Anti Federalists
880 Words | 4 PagesAnti Federalists were the people that kept individual rights still today. They did not like the Constitution and wanted all the power to be held within the states. The anti federalists felt that a strong national government threatened people and state’s rights. Federalists opposed the Articles of Confederation, they wanted a strong national government under the Constitution. The people thought the Constitution needed to be ratified, by adding the Bill of Rights to protect people’s rights and freedoms.
Explain The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Us Constitution
909 Words | 4 PagesPreceding the formation of the Articles of Confederation, the Constitutional Convention was held in which delegates debated about the representation of our country and how the states would be represented. Do to the weakness of the Articles, delegates had another debate on whether or not to create a U.S.
Pros And Cons Of The Great Compromise
337 Words | 2 PagesHow two big arguments turned into big agreements. A Compromise is when two people or states can't agree on something because they both want something different. The two compromises that came out of the constitutional convention are the Great Compromise and the ⅗ Compromise. The Great Compromise was an agreement between the larger states and the smaller states about their representation. The first plan was the Virginia plan which had the senate and the House of Representatives and this made it where it was based on the people which meant if the people in a certain amount from each state voted on something then it would be passed and in the states, this plan favored the larger states because of their larger populations.
The Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention
637 Words | 3 PagesThe main goal was to create an effective federal government, while safeguarding individual liberties. The debates were heated and there were several divisions, however three key compromises made the Constitution possible. The first issue was about giving fair representation to both large and small states. James Madison’s, Virginia Plan proposed to create a Congress with
More about Constitutional Convention Versus The Great Compromise
Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention
705 Words | 3 PagesConstitutional Convention Pros And Cons
572 Words | 3 PagesConstitutional Convention Dbq Essay
629 Words | 3 PagesTo What Extent Was The Constitutional Convention Of 1787
584 Words | 3 PagesAssess The Difference Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists
543 Words | 3 PagesThe Argument Against The Anti-Federalists
99 Words | 1 PagesCentral Focus And Purpose Of The Constitutional Convention
647 Words | 3 PagesCompare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists
642 Words | 3 PagesConstitutional Convention In 1787
420 Words | 2 PagesThe Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention
1593 Words | 7 PagesWhat Was The Purpose Of The Constitutional Convention Between 1786 And 1787
1104 Words | 5 PagesCompare And Contrast The Bill Of Rights And Anti Federalists
880 Words | 4 PagesExplain The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Us Constitution
909 Words | 4 PagesPros And Cons Of The Great Compromise
337 Words | 2 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention
637 Words | 3 Pages