The media article that I will be assessing in this essay is “Crime Falls to Lowest Level in 33 Years”. The article is written by Darren McCaffrey who is the politics reporter for Sky news. The article was published on Thursday 24th April 2014 by Sky news. The article includes several statistics which are taken from the Crime survey for England and Wales although the results are published by the Office for National Statistics. The statistics presented in the article claim that levels of crime have decreased by 15% compared with the previous year and that this is the lowest they have been in 30 years. It is also claimed that the levels of violence and vandalism have fallen by 20% and 15% respectively and that the levels of shoplifting and fraud have increased by 6% and 25% respectively. In this essay I will be assessing where the statistics originate from and how they were collected. I will also be looking to see if the statistics are valid and being …show more content…
When looking at the figures, it states that 35,000 adults per year and 3,500 children per year make up the nationally representative sample; although there was only a 67% response rate for 2013 in comparison to 73% in 2012 (Crime in England and Wales, 2014, p4). If we look at these figures in relation to the population of England and Wales it can be proven that these figures are not “a sample that reflects the population accurately (Bryman 2008, p698)”. The estimated population, as stated in the Office for National Statistics population mid release report 2013, for England was 53.9 million people and for Wales was 3.1 million people, this totals to a population of 57 million people in England and Wales. Looking back at the sample for the crime survey for England and Wales we can now see that only 0.068% of the population is actually sampled and therefore cannot be a representative sample (Annual Mid-year Population Estimates,
Through this graph we see a substantial difference in the amount of crime from 1990, which was 527,257 in contrast to 2014, which was 106,722. We can also
(Witkin 2) From there, Witkin begins to analyze the connection between the crime decrease and harsher prison sentencing and smarter policing (Witkin 2) As stated by Witkin, “Imprisonment...seems to be important, but not the underlying cause of the crime drop…” and while “...smarter policing was spectacularly decisive in some cities… it probably was not the key factor nationwide.” (Witkin 3-4).
The U.S.’ prison population has increased by 500% from 1972 to 2003, accounting for a rise of 200,000 incarcerated persons to over 2,000,000, which is significantly higher than other developed countries. Growth in this population according to Mauer seems to be fueled by periods of rising crime rates, which the media loves to distort and blow out of proportion in order to instill fear in its citizens. Rather than addressing more important issues such as the underlying causes of crime, the media plays on its viewers’ fear by focusing on news such as gang violence, shootings, and drug activity. This reflects one of Mauer’s themes, the ‘dumbing-down of America’, where due to the controlling educational system, obedient media, and oppression; Americans
The serious crime was low in 1990, but it is not an error. However, the crime rose up to seventy nine percent in
Contrary to the common belief, crime has been on the decline for the past three decades. Yet, news and media have been covering crime more than ever, resulting in the public belief that crime is at an all time high. The sharp drop in crime since the early 1990s has left experts curious to discover the reasons for the decrease in crime. As I compare the article Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors that Explain the Decline and Six that Do Not by Steven D. Levitt and the article Evaluating Contemporary Crime Drop(s) in America, New York City, and Many Other Places by Eric P. Baumer and Kevin T. Wolff, I will briefly describe the articles, compare their agreements and disagreements, as well as discuss my personal preferences.
This report measures the “crime rate (as) the number of crimes per unit of population” (Hagan, 2014, p.
Abstract The Uniform Crime Report Program is a national program set to voluntarily report a crime to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The FBI recognized a need for national crime statistics to do its job more effectively (“About the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program,” n.d.). According to James Inciardi, it was recognized that the UCR had problems in 1978 as they were “incomplete and structurally biased” which made crimes into myths instead of reality (Inciardi, 1978, pg. 3). The statistics are submitted by cities, counties, and states nationwide.
The reliability of official statistics, especially through documents based on police data, can be hindered by a number of limitations. As police data is one of the main sources of data looked at when studying statistics, the limitations revolve around the reporting and recording of the crimes. There are instances in which the official crime statistics do not reflect the precise crime rates. (Ross, 1999) Misrepresentation can be caused by a number of different factors.
The null hypothesis shows there is no evidence that punishing the offender with harsher sentences deter the offender from committing a crime (??). This shows that the government should change the policy of ‘tough on crime’ when the policy has no impact and less and less public support; this out-dated policy should stop being used where instead of the government should stop looking at tackling crime, but finding ways to prevent crime. To prevent crime people have to look at the root of the cause, which can be the inequality distribution of wealth, racism, family violence, and poor parenting, no opportunity of education or jobs. Need for social programs that deter people from crime; especially young adults who tend to fall into the cycle of crime (6,
Based on the readings in Chapter 4, during the 1990’s there were 8 explanations for the drop in crime. Those explanations were, innovative policing strategies, increased reliance on prisons, changes in crack and other drug markets, aging of the population, tougher gun-control laws, strong economy, increased number of police and all other explanations (which includes gun buyback and increase use of capital punishment). I was very surprised by the findings in the reach found by Levitt and Dubner. The explanations given initially I believed were very good reasons for drop in crime. The shock was that most of those were not even reason for crime drops and the ones that were actual valid reasons were not what I expected.
Short Summary: Chapter 2 of The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison was about how the way society sees crime can be distorted by the media, the justice system, and the information we are presented with about what crime really is. It points out that medical neglect, known environmental hazards, dangerous workplace conditions, and poverty cause more injuries yearly than murders, assaults, and robberies. Most people see the latter as “crime,” but not the former. Long Summary: Chapter 2 of The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison discusses people’s skewed perspective when it comes to what they think crime really is. The reader is asked to do an exercise regarding their own reason.
People living in urban areas had much higher rates of crime than people living in suburbs and rural areas. Those who live in single family homes have lower rates of crime than people living in apartments (National Crime Survey). To summarize, our chances for violent victimization are more controlled by what we do than by
This is an increase of nearly 20’000 recorded crimes in just 3 years. Note that these are only the recorded figures. Many more crimes go unreported. This may be because of intimidation, blackmail or embarrassment among many reasons.
Safety of our citizens is of utmost importance in creating a robust society. Building sustainable communities that are inclusive, secure and sensitive to needs of the citizens will continue to be of national priority. However, over the years, crime has stymied this endeavour. There must be a commitment to ensuring safety, security and justice for all citizens, which are seen as moral rights and intrinsic to development. Good policing, targeted social interventions and an efficient judicial system are needed to help our nation thrive.