Cultural competence is the ability of professionals to function successfully with people from different cultural backgrounds including race, ethnicity, culture, class, gender, sexual orientation, religion, physical or mental ability, age and national origin (Mirsky, 2013). Counselors should be aware of their culture background and experiences that can lead to attitudes and bias that can occur. I believe that continuing education and training experiences can be effective when working with culturally different populations.
Second i will talk about being success at critical thinking.1.Be clear about your conclusions, 2.Have a clear lines of reasoning, 3.Use evidence to support your reasoning, 4.Evaluate your own writing through critical reading and 5.Take multiple perspectives. Third, the advantages of critical thinking. People with professional critical thinking skills are able to: *Understand the logical connection between ideas, *Identify, construct and evaluate arguments, *Detect inconsistencies and commit mistakes in reasoning, *Solve problems systematically, *Identify relevance and importance of ideas, *Reflect on the justification of one's own beliefs and values. Fourth, When we think critically? *Rationality: Rely on reason rather than emotion,require evidence, ignore no known evidence and follow evidence where it leads.
It is important to understand that different tones are created to support different themes, as revealed through both Rowlandson’s and Erdrich’s texts. Through specific diction, an author can achieve a captivating tone which will support the message the author is trying to communicate. Words alone are powerful, as they hold immeasurable value and meaning capable of leaving a lasting
Cultural competence has been defined as “the ability of individuals to establish effective interpersonal and working relationships that supersede cultural differences” by recognizing the importance of social and cultural influences on patients, considering how these factors interact, and devising interventions that take these issues into account(Lee,Buse,&Fustukian,2002). In a diverse world, when developing life changing policies culture must be considered. Policies can be influenced by culture in many different ways. Involving culture in policy development can be benefitcal because it considers. Cultural competence, is the ability to interact effectively with people of different cultures, helps to ensure the needs of all community members are addressed(Lee,Buse,&Fustukian,2002).
In essence, chunking is established as one of the mechanisms for human cognition process. It is crucial in explaining the relationship between the external environment and the internal cognitive processes (Reed, 2010). Empirical evidence in support of the relevance of chunking theory exists, especially in relation to the way that humans perceive words, paragraphs and words as single units, overshadowing their representation as comprising of collections of phonemes or letters. For example, the chunking theory explains how skilled readers have a tendency to be insensitive to deleted or repeated words. Studies that use information concerning timing of responses to ascertain the presence of chunks exemplifies evidence on the relevance of the chunking theory are particularly useful in understanding effectiveness.
For me, cultural competence is all about understanding the culture, belief and value of other people and your own. It is how we deal with our own and other people’s conviction. For one’s self, it is being culturally aware of how the world works and how each culture is different from each other. It is acquiring knowledge of other people’s customs and achieving cultural skills to share to everyone. It is our willingness to value other people’s way of life and accepting them openly.
Despite the fact that intercultural competence has different terminology when referring to disciple or approach, it can also relate to the debate about global citizenship. Intercultural competence is seen as the capability to develop an objective knowledge, attitude, and skills that prompt visible behavior and communication that are both successful and appropriate in intercultural interaction. In other words, intercultural competence is a range of different skills; cognitive, affective, and behavioral skills that lead to communicate effectively and suitable with different surrounding and culture. Intercultural competence can also be broken down into three constituent elements seen as knowledge, skills, and attitude. (Deardorff, 2006) With that being said, knowledge is my substantial weakness while skills and attitude are my strengths regarding intercultural competence.
Burgoon, Thomas Birk, and Michael Pfau, “that sets of nonverbal, vocal, kinesic, and proxemic behaviors have substantial impact on source credibility and speaker persuasiveness” (161). More specifically, Burgoon, Birk and Pfau, report that in their research, “nonverbal behaviors posited to create percepts fitting an evaluative dimension (i.e., pleasantness and immediacy behaviors) contributed significantly to credibility judgments of competence, composure, sociability, and character” (162). The research presented by Burgoon, Birk, and Pfau has an obvious correlation to the nonverbal behaviors exhibited by Bill Clinton in his 1993
Partisanship (such as commitment to a local culture, community, or group) can be countered with a spotlight on world citizenship. In other words, build an understanding of a global community working together versus allegiance to one group or community. 3. Recognizing what is fundamental for everyone, specifically, “their aspirations to justice and goodness and their capacities for reasoning in this connection.” The last reason refers to establishing a fair and respectful intuitive insight of others (Nussbaum, 2002, p.8, cited in Crosbie, 2014, p.
A useful definition of critical thinking is that provided by the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking: ‘critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. In its exemplary form, it is based on universal intellectual values that transcend subject matter divisions: clarity, accuracy, precision, consistency, relevance, sound evidence, good reasons, depth, breadth, and fairness’ (Criticalthinking.org, 2013). Critical thinking is what enables people to identify weaknesses in an argument