I. Introduction One of the most constantly deserted and returned to worldly issues, is globalization. Its scope is so wide that varying matters and happenings relate to it. After waves of political, social, and economic issues wash over one after another, it has always gone back to and talked about, written about, and debated about. Some might argue that it is a matter worth discussing due to the gradual development occurring. And for others, it is a matter to look out for, for how ever helpful and imperative the effects of globalization are, it has the potential to be catastrophic if not managed well. But despite the efforts to control globalization, can one really say that this global phenomenon is capable of being administered and …show more content…
Specialists and professionals have debated as to why a persistent rift is transpiring despite efforts to reduce the gap between these two, and one factor that can hold accountable for is globalization. With the current power and influence of core countries, there is an easier diffusion of their beliefs and culture to the peripheries. Because of the wealth they possess, these Western nations are capable of developing themselves, while leaving poor nations to pointlessly attempt to imitate them. Moreover, the peripheries’ vulnerabilities prevent them from progressing, and keep them dependent to these dominant nations. The hegemony has been manifested for a long time now and this has caused vexations for the affected nations, consequently and gradually creating what is now known as global terrorism. This research focuses on the relationship between globalization and global terrorism, and how the former affects the latter. It also tackles the current terrorist groups, such as Al-Qaida and the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) that have formed in recent years, and how they are related to the global …show more content…
Many factors have come to play in the rise of terrorism, though key elements that paved the way for it to be thoroughly established are technology and neo-liberal ideas. They have laid the foundations for individualistic ideologies and the method in transferring and spreading these outside of their origins. Technology plays a very important role in society, as it has been one of the causes of modernization and comfortable living. However, a dichotomy on the use and purpose of technology is gradually developing, and defenders and attackers of this tool each have own rational features. And through a firm belief on the use of technology in people’s lives, the ideology of technological determinism has emerged. Douglas Kellner (2002) enumerated significant points of each side.
Supporters argue that technology creates a new economy and thus producing a renewed wealth of nations. Through the breakthrough of new technology, the structure of the economy is reconstructed so much so that small firms are given the opportunity to compete and flourish with larger firms. Moreover, it has increased the quality of a number of social aspects, such as education and recreation, among many others. And as mentioned earlier, technology facilitates in better communications, as well as ideologies, part of which are neo-liberal ideas that strongly support the idea of
The article begins with an attempt to challenge our opinion of the universal truth that education is the key to economic success and explains that technology
In the article “The Ticking Bomb”, by Wade Davis, the author uses historical events to further evident his argument of the increase global tension and poverty due to the affluence western countries. The author starts the article with the 9/11 attack and, throughout the article, he examines the cause and effect of the attack. The author concludes that the United States is an omnipotent country, as they “dominate the geopolitical scene” (4). After the 9/11 attack, Americans declare a “war on terror” (G.W. Bush), which, as the author suggests, “[is an isolated phenomenon; however, the al-Qaeda organization, the organization that cause the attack, manifest into conflicts that are getting deeper and broader]” (5). The author then introduces the
John Horgan’s book “The Psychology of Terrorism” examines what terrorist do and how they go about their motives. Horgan asserts the claim that terrorist use a variety of motives in order to change political objectives through the use of violence (Horgan 2003). Using a plethora of weapons, such as guns, bombs and others weapons of mass destruction Horgan believes that these means are a symbol of revolutionary liberation. The use of the internet and the way terror acts are portrayed in the media, which Horgan calls…” a poor mans tatic”…. in that these internet and media coverage are boasted to the public creating fear and suspicion, which leads to people being on high alert looking for
Osama Bin Laden (OBL), an arch-terrorist and founder of the Al-Qaeda, was assassinated on May, 2011 in a covert US operation (Kitfield, 2013). By the time of his death, Osama had been linked to several terrorist activities including the September, 11 attacks that killed nearly 3000 people (Michaels, 2012). It was hoped that his death would dismantle or cripple the Al-Qaeda, a terrorist network formed and led by OBL. Three years down the line it is still not clear whether OBL’s death crippled, dismantled or strengthened the terror network. This essay intends to discuss the discourse and assessments that have evolved three years after his death to explain its impact on Al-Qaeda.
It is important for a definition such as this to be accepted internationally as current definitions of terrorism can be abused by various factions. Many terrorist organizations use the current ambiguous definition of terrorism to promote their own interests and goals. Although politicians also promote their own interests and needs by making political use of the term “terrorism” by emphasizing the brutality of the term (Ganor 293). Another significant reason that an international definition for terrorism is adopted is to help emphasize the difference between terrorism
After a terrorist attack of any kind there are always consequences that must be faced. Sometimes the point of the terrorist attacks is because the organization wished to send a message or to influence policy in their favor. However, after the 9/11 attacks administrators realized that the United States was not prepared for a tragedy of this kind and had little to no measures to prevent one, this lead them to create new programs and policies. Terrorist organization’s goal often comes down to one of the following: regime change, territorial change, policy change, social control and status quo maintenance. The main purpose of a terror attack may well be to influence public policy.
JEMAAH ISLAMIAH INTRODUCTION 11th September 2001(or 9/11) has been significant date for Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) when Washington and New York were attacked by terrorist. The attacks have caused 2,996 casualties and at least USD10 billion of property and infrastructure damage excluded incalculable of fall of global market. The perpetrators of the attack turn out to be Arabs acting in the name of their religious faith. 9/11 marks something new whereby United States of America was able to influence its allies to confront Islamic extremism lead by Al-Qaeda. Following 9/11, we have seen the establishment of South-East Asia particularly in Malay Archipelago as the second front in GWOT instead from Afghanistan and Middle-East.
This paper will examine the dangers that the Al-Qaeda organization remains to have on the United States’ nation and security. One factor that has contributed to the dangers of the Al-Qaeda organization to the United States is the exploitation of political and social grievances by their network. Al-Qaeda has been able to use their anger and oppression to recruit new members and inspire acts of terrorism around the world. The ultimate goal of this organization is to fortify equality among Muslim people and create dissension against non-Muslims.
Recent discoveries show, “Of 134 jihadist-inspired terrorists who have carried out or plotted attacks here since 9/11, 96 were U.S. citizens” (Jenkins). In the United States there has been a serious rise in domestic terrorism, however the government refuses to acknowledge it. Instead their focus has been abroad, rightly so in some cases, while more domestic attacks make headline news. The change in visa laws does nothing, because since 9/11 86% of the terror attacks have been plotted or carried out by American citizens. Therefore, the United States needs to step up its efforts to combat domestic terrorism because the jail time is too short for current terrorists, there are no true task forces for current attacks, and there has been an increase of these groups and attacks.
The progression of technology has changed the face of terrorism. By examining the improved skills of terrorists and governments brought about through technology, this report will examine the impact of technology on terrorism. On the thirteenth of November 2015, a chain of terrorist attacks befell in Paris, the capital of France, and its northern suburb, Saint-Denis. Three suicide bombers struck near the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, trailed by suicide bombings and mass shootings at cafés, restaurants and a music venue in Paris. The assailants murdered 130 people.
Should United States Help Refugees? Since the invasion of Iraq by the U.S. and its allies, a wide political disturbance has occurred in the Middle East. As a result, Iraq witnessed a strong resistance movement to occupation forces, and a terrible civil war. Also, since then, people of some other Arab countries such as Tunis, Egypt, Yemen, and Syria revolted against their corrupt and failed regimes.
Technology can be defined as “the branch of knowledge that deals with the creation and use of technical means and their interrelation with life, society, and the environment”. (n.d.) Therefore, when we speak of technological evolution we can say that it is an “innovation and technology related hypothesis that describes the fundamental change of society through technical development”. Different theorists have their own perspective on the evolution of technology but, although each of their views differs from another, they shared certain common features, mechanism, and incidence in technology. Some theorists have developed distinct approaches to understanding the nature of the technological process and the relationship between technological development and the social world.
Abstract Any moment, a terrorist attack could be carried out. In today's globalized society, understanding the threat from domestic terrorist groups is of paramount importance. Terrorist organizations emerge from many different areas around the world to include domestically each with their own goals and motivations. While some terrorist organizations focus on worldwide influence, others strive for local communities. Domestic terrorist groups are occurring more often than transnational terrorist incidents and their actions can have a significant impact on both national security and public safety.
Globalization may turn out not to be the ‘universalizing’ force that many envisage: global trade has only recently returned to levels last seen in 1913, for instance - the eve of the Great War. In drawing together people of different and usually contending worldviews, globalization could yet prove to be a recipe for more international conflict rather than a means of reconfiguring different nations along similar lines based on ‘global assemblages’. History, as ever, will deliver the final
INTRODUCTION Over the years, the topic of terrorism has been a very controversial one. Various researchers have come up with diverse definitions of terrorism yet there is still no accurate global consensus on what the definition of the term really is. Defining terrorism is very important because without a definition, it is difficult to identify which act of violence is classified a terrorist act, thus making it difficult to justify or condemn the act. A. Pedahzur et al (2004) attempted to provide a consensus definition of terrorism by empirically analysing how academics have used the term over the years.