Eales’ pessimistic perception of corporate pollution of the planet presents a grim, disheartening reality as he portrays the thick, impenetrable smog released into the atmosphere and the sizable corporations and businesses that produce it. In this business cartoon, the artist paints an image of two businessmen standing atop a building as they gaze upon the polluted air created by the very businesses that they work for. In addition, he adds the quote “Think of it not as pollution, but as the sweet fragrance of prosperity,” which brings to mind the merciless attitude we humans demonstrate for the sake of progress. Eales’ satirical tone about businesses displays his stance on the issue as he ridicules corporations and companies alike. For the sake of progress and advancement, humans will stop at nothing to achieve their goal, whether they have to harm the environment or massacre the general public. …show more content…
For this reason, the people created for the purpose of this cartoon try to rephrase the negative idea of pollution into a more positive topic regarding prosperity and progress. Their euphemism of pollution only tries to cover up its severe aspects and characteristics and not confront them. All things considered, the cartoonist desired to bring attention to this issue while stating the hypocrisy of corporations as they claim to be improving society when, in fact, they are only bringing harm to nature and to the environment. By creating this cartoon, he has stated his opinion on the matter as he implies how he yearns to stop pollution and the corporations that contaminate the atmosphere with their toxic gases and
Logan Carroll Professor Wyant THEO 421 14 April 2023 Purchasing Habits As a St. Thomas student, I have learned the value of ethical and sustainable practices. As a finance major, I have learned that being ethical in business decisions is of the utmost importance. I am glad that in the last four years, I have also heard about businesses becoming more sustainable. In this economy, sustainability is critical for a circular future.
What are the large Factories doing to our environment? In the novel Big Burn written by Lesley Choyce Chris and Marina attempt to get the incinerator shut down for polluting the surrounding environment. Chris and Marina decided it would be best after they came across 4 dead merganser ducks on the outer area of the incinerator. After confronting Mr. Gibson (Incinerator Boss) about the pending issue Chris and Marina are kicked out of the building and escorted home by cops. However Chris and Marina’s intentions are only fueled more when Dial Chemical Company attempts to build a second incinerator at Rocky Harbour.
The photograph for Document 7 demonstrates how much pollution was getting put out into the environment because of the factories. The pollution that is being exposed is dangerous, because it can lead to citizens
In this article they talk about how a Siberian gulag is one of the most polluted place in the world and how one man found a way to make profit off of it. This man is named Vladimir M. Stratyev; He is a miner of air pollution. In this area, metal particle rain down on the city and builds up in the river and on the streets. This is because of the smelter that produces one-fifth of the world’s nickel. When the metal cloud started to fall on the city Mr. Stratyev was a business opportunity.
As seen in the 1882 political cartoon, an Octopus with the words “Corporate Greed. All for Ourselves. Nothing for the Public,” while hoarding crates underneath it with names of railroads depicts what railroads were doing to businesses. Railroads were setting high rates and over charging that made it hard for entrepreneurs to make money. The cartoon also depicted the mind sets rich business men had.
It’s clear that no one tried at all to sustain a healthy environment. The sawmill in the background looks like it’s putting out everything you wouldn’t want to breathe in. The sawmill is certainly having a very negative impact on the environment. Based on the outside looks of the sawmill, it can be inferred that the inside working conditions of the factory are just as
Bill McKibben and Derrick Jensen were born in 1960 in the U.S.A., and both have accomplished successful academic backgrounds. McKibben graduated from Harvard University in 1982, and Derrick Jensen graduated from the Colorado School of Mines with a degree in Mineral engineering in 1983. Both are environmental activists and have written many articles and books. Two of their articles “Waste Not, Want Not” by Bill McKibben and “Forget Shorter Showers” by Jensen are published in the Bedford Reader book (557-567). When we analyze these articles both authors agree on consumers contribution to environmental pollution, but they have different points of views concerning whether individuals or industrialists cause more environmental pollution.
Carnegie was a “robber baron” who constantly tried to create an image of himself as a “captain of industry”, but he would have been more successful if he helped the employees in his factories rather than trying to help them outside of
There are two types of businessmen in this world, “Robber Barons” and “Captains of Industry”. “Robber Baron” is a idiom established during the United States Industrial Revolution of the 1800s. It is used to describe demeaning businessman that are wealthy industrialist, those who monopolize companies, and use unfair practices within their businesses. On the other hand “Captains of Industry” are positive businessman that contribute to the nation. For instance they provide jobs, increase productivity, expand the markets, and increase trade.
In Document 7 it displays a lot of the air filled with bad pollution from the factories. Bad air is awful for people to be inhaling, people can get sick from breathing in the unpleasant air. In Document 10 the appearance is that of a man who is big and his cart says “CHILD LABOR EXPLOITER.” Underneath that, there is a bag with a money symbol then another money bag. The children are pulling him while looking thirsty and exhausted.
The incident escalated on Twitter when a consumer tweeted a picture of pre-peeled oranges wrapped in plastic sold at Whole Foods, sarcastically criticizing the supermarket for wasting the plastic on the oranges that mother nature couldn’t “find a way to cover” otherwise, highlighting and condemning how a business can negatively influence society by deteriorating the environment. Although Whole Foods Market pulled the product down after apologizing and explaining that it was just an experiment with a seasonal product as “customers love the convenience that their cut product offers”, it didn’t stop a Twitter debate from happening, showcasing how society can positively influence a businesses’ behavior. Some people condemned it was unethical of
Pollution is starting to be a major problem in the United States. The main problem begins in cities or highly populated areas and it can occur because of car exhaust, emissions from manufacturing companies, cigarette smoke, biological pollutants, etc. One way Sophie Krause proposes to solve at least a part of the problem is to “Go Green with Blue Roofs.” She proposes that people change the structure of their roof in order to help the draining systems. The water will filter better and public waterways will be safer to drink from.
Klein takes advantage of this phenomenon and incorporates these companies into her essay. By doing this, she makes a stronger connection with her readers and allows her claim to more easily
Pollution may be a threat, but it can be solved in our
A Case Study on Polluter’s Dilemma I. Background/Point of View On a small plastic manufacturing, Jonica Gunson works as an environmental compliance manager. The company where she is working with is now facing a serious situation that needs to have a fast and decisive decision, decision whether to invest or not to invest money on new technology that will help decrease or as possible eliminate the level of toxic in the water which is flowing from the back of the factory up to lake. Though the company is compliant with the levels of emissions set by the Environmental Management board, the manager sees that environmental procedures for this specific toxic are sheathing behind logical evidence, particularly that there is a protest from a certain scientist that is publish in the newspaper.