I also belief it is a murder and that women should take this topic more serious. I believe that if this unwanted pregnancy was caused by violation or rape that the fetus should be born and then given up for adoption rather than to kill or murder it. Greg Abbott to me has made a very fair law when it comes to abortion here in Texas. A fetus is a life, it becomes a life the moment its heart beats. It is a life that did not ask to be brought to this world specially to be killed in the horrific way they do it.
The government must have certain laws in order to maintain control, murder is against the law, whether an adult is killed or a child. Abortion should be illegal in the United States. Termination is a last resort option; it kills an innocent child and gives people less options to adopt. Abortion is unconstitutional and should not be practiced in the United States There are other options besides abortion, women can have the baby and take care of the child or can have the baby and put the child up for
Illegalizing Abortion Will Not End Abortion For over 40 years, the Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade in 1973 has been a point of controversy in America. Many people are calling for the case to be overturned; others are fighting for it to be upheld. Among all this disagreement, people have looked towards the government for help, leading this issue to become a political hot spot. Candidates of all types of government elections are very clear on their views of abortion, which can lead to some “one-topic votes”. Some candidates have also made it clear that they want to illegalize abortion, therefore ending it.
Additionally, rational women should have the right to decide if they want to keep or abort the child, as she is the best person to judge whether the child is a price that can be paid. Advances in abortion cases today support this argument, with young girls who are too immature to be fully supporting mothers, the decision to abort is more rational. This freedom of choice reflects the mother’s moral right, who has a fully developed consciousness regarding abortion. Thus, in my opinion, due to the lack of the foetus’s moral status is more important. The first-trimester foetus is shown to lack moral status, as it is not able to function in a moral community; it is instead only genetically human, making it morally permissible to have an abortion.
Many states agree with the idea of abortion being fetal homicide, although, according to a scientific study, fetuses are unable to feel pain until at least their 26th week of life (“ 'Fetal Pain ' Anti-Abortion Laws Spur Fierce Debate. ")("Fetal Homicide Laws."). If a fetus is not even able to feel pain, the idea of “murdering” the fetus should not even be considered because it is barely developed. According to the Bible, some pro-life activists say that “Thou shalt not kill” applies to unborn children further implying that abortion is murder (The Holy Bible: King James Version). Though, the Bible can be interpreted in many different ways, and there are many religious folk who are pro-choice.
Abortion dehumanizes life to the point of death; nothing can justify the death and dehumanization of a baby. Today, pro-choice individuals try to justify abortion as a woman’s right to control her own body. However, this reason is self-centered and ignores the fact that the life in the woman’s womb is human in nature. This reasoning also puts the woman’s personal interests and comforts above the value of the life of the baby.
The liberal position on abortion attempts to refute the second premise by pointing out that the fetus is only a member of the species Homo sapiens; it is not a ‘person.’ Peter Singer clearly distinguishes between a member of the species Homo sapiens and a person by characterizing a person as one who possesses capacities of rationality, awareness, autonomy and self-consciousness. A fetus possesses none of these capacities, and therefore, Singer believes that killing a fetus is morally permissible. This description of a ‘person’ also proves that there is no significant difference between the mental capacity of a premature infant and a late-stage fetus, and this description may provide the illusion that there is no difference between undergoing an abortion and committing infanticide. However, this illusion shall be countered by my
The word premature birth by definition implies the prompted removal of a baby from the womb before it can survive freely. Premature birth is a to a great degree questionable issue in light of the fact that while a few individuals are totally against it, others trust that a lady ought to have the privilege to pick. I trust that premature birth is ethically and morally off-base. Most women choose to have abortions because the timing was not right or their quality life and situations are not suitable for them to bring a child into this world, in which they become victim to resulting in abortions and forget about their morals humanity “But these quality of life considerations always involve issues of lesser moral weight than that of the conservation
Abortion should be illegal after one month of being pregnant. The number one cause for people getting an abortion is because it isn’t the right time, that to me is stupid because they knew that there was a chance that getting pregnant could happen. If a girl got raped I understand her wanting to get an abortion, but as Frank Pavon said in his article, “Rape and Abortion”, “Will and abortion help her? First of all the abortion will not un-rape the woman. The tragedy has happened and nothing can change the past.
Another argument against abortion is that allowing abortion is “legalising killing and legalising killing reduces peoples respect for life” (Levitt, 2005). Reducing the societies respect for life is a bad thing as it could cause and increase in murder rates. Therefore abortion is always wrong. I find these arguments weak as the first argument is repetitive and continuously states that ‘killing is wrong’ which it is however “before 18 weeks old a baby is nothing but a bundle of cells with no pain receptors meaning that the termination of a pregnancy would not be painful for the foetus” (BBC, 2014). The second argument
Abortion is a topic that causes controversy all over the world. In the case of Roe v Wade, abortion was declared legal, although many still question if this should be the case (5). Whether you are pro-life or pro-choice, stating your opinion about the issue can create an outbreak of opinions. Yes, abortion is legal, and yes, women have the right to do with their bodies as they please. However, many consider abortion to be murder, which is not legal and can be punishable by death.
Having an abortion is inhumane, but removing planned parenthood organizations because of a women’s decision of having an abortion shouldn’t be a concern for the government. Planned Parenthood is more than a center to receive an abortion, but because of the pro-life versus pro-choice movement, everyone is missing that vital point. It 's not about defeating your opposing enemy anymore, it 's about health care for men and women all over the
Even if a mother’s life is at risk a pro-life advocate wouldn’t see it necessary for the abortion procedure. Numerous physicians have stated that it’s rare for abortion to be necessary to save a mother 's life and even if it were it is wrong to intentionally kill a innocent person to save another. For many pro-choice advocates the life and health of the mother are frequently used as reasons to keep abortion legal. If the mother has a medical issue which can complicate the pregnancy then it is medically necessary to have an abortion. In some cases where the mother happens to be a teen girl her body isn’t ready yet for childbirth.
He states that if a women wants to obtain an abortion, they would have to tell a doctor. You would also need to go to a clinic or a hospital. So, therefore it was not private at all. His dissent also stated that the fourteenth amendment should only protect people from loosing their freedom when they do not follow laws. "Almost no one.
Many people question the morality of abortion and several religious aspects come into play about the legalization of abortion. However, the separation of church and state makes any religious aspect invalid when it comes to legalizing anything. Furthermore, Democrats feel that abortion can be justified in cases such as rape or when a woman’s health is endangered and even teen pregnancy, so women should have the right to an abortion. Though deciding to get an abortion can be a very difficult decision, Democrats have agreed that this decision should be between a woman and her doctor without government interference, specifically Republican men who will never be faced with this decision and have no medical experience. This is why Democrats call it “women’s right to choose” and not “Republican’s right to deny” when it comes to abortion since it is about women specifically.