Federal Government Vs State Government

By splitting up the types of power the government and states hold, the citizens’ rights are afforded, as noted by James Madison, “double security” from tyranny by either the states or the government. All other political power remains with the states as a result of the 10th Amendment which also states that the federal government may only exercise the powers as defined within the Constitution. Unless the people want the federal government to execute a power, then the government can not take such individual actions like they have with the Net-neutrality rules. As Madison wrote in Federalist #45 of the Federalist Papers “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”

Since the signing of the United States Constitution, the dividing of powers in the United States has been based on the sharing of powers between the national government and the local governments (state governments in the case of the United States), which became known as Federalism. Amendment II states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment has most recently been interpreted to grant the right of gun ownership to individuals for purposes that include self-defense. At first it was thought to apply only to the Federal government, but through the mechanism of the Fourteenth Amendment, it has been applied to the states as

“The different governments will each control each other at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Doc A, Madison,James, Federalist Paper 51, 1788). Each part of the government had there own jobs to do, for example the central government has the power to regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, provide an army and navy, while the state government set up local governments, holds elections,

The President is limited to what he/ she can achieve. The President must essentially share powers with the other two branches of government stated above. Congress is the one who has the upper hand over the President with issues such as foreign and interstate commerce, financial, and most importantly legislative approval. Congress has the power to pass a legislation and allocate the money. With the Affordable Health Care Act even though it was the Presidents law the Congress and Supreme Court had to approve of passing the

The first method the Constitution protects against tyranny is Federalism. Federalism is the division of power between state and national government. In Document A it interprets that the governments will each have a portion of power and not be able to have all the power. This evidence helps explain why the Constitution guards against tyranny because Federalism will allow both governments to have limited powers. Another method the Constitution protects against tyranny is Separation of Powers.

Edwards and Wattenberg define Federalism as, “a way of organizing a nation so that two or more levels of government share formal authority over the same area and people. (Edwards and Wattenburg,70)” When the United States first started to form a central government their objective was to never allow for a dominating power to take over the country again. To do so they created a division of power and made it possible for states and more so the “people” the right to have more of an impact on government. Or so were their intended thoughts when creating the constitution and the branches. In doing so their focus constrained national government but left a loose string as to what the states and their constitutions could do.

The creation of the Constitution expressed all their hatred for tyranny and the solum goal was to prevent tyranny in the United States. The United states established three branches the executive, legislative, and judicial. They keep each other within their limitations with the distribution of power. The federal and

The original system of dual federalism was set up so that the states and national government were separate but worked together. The states did most of the governing instead of the national government. “Citizens daily lives were chiefly affected by their states government not the national.” (Champagne and Harpham, 86) The national government role was to provide for national defence and foreign policy and assist in the development of commerce.

Our establishing fathers added to the technique, the detachment of forces, to forestall misuse of power among the three branches and to ensure the opportunity of all. Every branch has its particular force- executive power belongs to the president, authoritative force exists within Congress, and the legal authority rests with the Supreme Court. The significance of the partition of powers was to make an administration that would not become domineering. Rather, it was deliberately intended to advance freedom and equitably speak to the will of the individuals. Another significant highlight of the division of forces is the guideline of giving each of the branches an extraordinarily diverse voting public.

Federalism is a “division of powers and functions between the national government and the state governments” (Ginseng). In the U.S.’s case, the Constitution is what divides the shared power between the state and the national government. The amount of power that each has is like a teeter-totter with the Constitution in the middle as the deciding factor. During the first century and a half of the United States, the U.S. practiced Dual Federalism. Dual Federalism is where each government, state and federal, has clear, exclusive control over certain areas, which leads some to call this “layer-cake federalism” since there is a clear line between the two (Christiansen).

But the new Constitution can make all the states become a united nation and not be a separate nation because the new constitution fixes this by forbidding states to tax and imports and giving the federal government the sole power to regulate trade that crosses state lines. In addition, the new Constitution balances the power of every branches of the government(legislature, judicial, executive), but under the Articles of Confederation the legislature branch takes all the power or all- powerful; and that does not make the nation become unite. Now, we must ratify our new Constitution for the good of our nation to be unite. First, in order for us to be united is to ratify the new Constitution and of the new Constitution the federal will be strong to preserve our freedom, promote our trade and protect our property; that 's something that our people and our nation really needs. But in order for us to preserve our freedom

Federalism is just a fancy word for the powers given to the states, to the central government, and powers the two share. Document A states that the central government can regulate trade, conduct foreign relations and declare war. The states can set up local governments, hold elections and establish schools. As James Madison said, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” What James Madison is trying to say is that the central and state governments have enough power that they don’t control everything.

Moving forward from the Constitutional issues with abortion, one can find themselves going into the political problems. To begin, it must be known that federalism is a key concept of the United States government. “Federalism refers to the multifaceted political power relationships

On July 4, 1776 the Declaration of Independence was signed and The United States of America declared itself a separate and independent nation. On June 21, 1788 the United States Constitution was made official, replacing the Articles of Confederation. Since its ratification, the Constitution has been amended several times in order to better apply to current times and situations the Founding Fathers could not have predicted. Despite all the changes the Constitution has gone through, its core principles remain.

After 13 colonies gained independence from Great Britain on July 4, 1776, Article of Confederation became their first government, where the federal government was too weak to enforce laws and sovereignty reside to states. It was then replaced by the U.S. Constitution. The authors of the Constitution desire a stronger national government and dual sovereignty and “argued that the best way of preserving liberty was divide power. If power is concentrated in any one place it can be used to crush individual liberty.” On the other hand, the antifederalists favored state government and limited national authorities.