Copyright piracy is a serious issue in today’s society, copyright piracy is the unauthorized reproduction of another one’s work such as music, books, and movies. During this essay, I will analyze the film “Good Copy Bad Copy” and compare it to two articles “Four Common Misconceptions About Copyright Piracy” and “Digital Piracy and The Copyright Response.”
The main issues that are raised in the film “Good Copy Bady Copy” are the conflicts that have arisen between current copyright laws and recent technological advances that have enabled the sampling of music through illegal downloading websites such as The Pirate Bay. During one scene of the film, Swedish police had raided The Pirate Bay but in a couple of days the website was back up and
…show more content…
One scene in the movie, Dr. Siva Vaidhyanathan discussed how copyright law undermines everyone’s interests, he used “The Grey Album” as an example. It was a CD that was produced by DJ Danger Mouse, in where DJ Danger Mouse took Jay Z’s “Black Album” and The Beatles “White Album.” The DJ had taken the vocal track from Jay-Z and samples from The Beatles and mixed them together. It was stated that everything he did from that was illegal but it became the biggest album of the year and Danger Mouse never received a dime from it and neither did Jay-Z or The Beatles even though it was one of the biggest albums of the year.
The article “Four Common Misconceptions About Copyright Piracy” starts off by stating that copyright piracy is the most difficult, yes important, transitional problems in the twenty-first century. This article also outlines the four misconceptions of copyright piracy with one of them being that copyright piracy is merely a cultural problem. What the author means by this is that when we examine piracy in foreign communities they always discuss the cultural differences that differentiate the
…show more content…
If you compare this to the movie, two men from Nigeria were being interviewed at they stated that “you can pirate foreign films and produce it and sell it at your own price.” This could be a cultural problem because they believe this is normal behavior. The third misconception was that copyright piracy was a past phenomenon in technologically advanced countries, this is not true because, in the movie, it was noted that MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) had lost millions of dollars due to piracy which proves that copyright piracy is not a past phenomenon in more advanced countries. I personally feel like the author from both articles would agree with the film because it gives us a clear understanding on the issue of copyright by going to different countries and showing us that each country has a different copyright issue. The only thing that I think the author might change is that in the movie they showed us how copyright piracy is in foreign countries but not as much in the United States. So I feel like Patrick K. Yu may try to explain how copyright piracy is an issue in the United States more than the current filmmaker did initially. Now onto what the authors would do about this particular issue, I feel like Patrick K. Yu may decide
Eric S. Faden’s video ,“Fair(y) Use Tale”, has infringed on Walt Disney Studios’ copyright rights. As Mr. Faden should know, copyright was made to push creativity and allow a creator to make money off his or her creation. Mr. Faden copied many clips from Disney movies without asking for Disney 's Permission First off and most importantly, Mr. Faden did ask for permission in any way as stated forty three seconds into the video. Many of Disney 's clips could have been licensed or bought from Disney but Faden decided to infringe all over Disney 's copyright. If he had bought the clips then the people who original made them would would get reimbursement for their hard work and effort.
This article is valuable to explain the concept of cultural defense as it provides scenarios to past court cases that use their culture to reduce charges and sentence. One of the scenarios
The author Johnson says in paragraph 10, "The music business is just that—a business. It exists to make money, and artists need to make money in order to continue making music." Furthermore, if artists refuse to do endorsement deals, they will not be able to
Police brutality, drug wars, and horrifying gang violence are just a few awful issues that black communities have had to face in the past, and are still occurring problems today. In the article Tearing the Roof Off the Sucker, producer of the film House Party, Reginald Hudlin successfully describes the relationship that many black communities have with police officers, stating “Blacks appreciate the importance of protection and someone to restore order, but at the same the people in that position abuse that right because they don’t respect the people they’re protecting” (Reginald, 23). This quote relates strongly to the film Straight Outta Compton because police brutality is a very important issue that is highlighted throughout the whole film,and
Following earlier reports on Jay Z, claiming that the rapper attended in court last Tuesday, October 13, after being charged with a copyright lawsuit over his 1999 hit song "Big Pimpin", the case remains unresolved even after Jay Z and producer Timbaland went on a two-day discussion with their lawyers and witnesses to determine what really rooted the problem. Reports say that while there has been no real conflict identified on Jay Z 's Big Pimpin 's elements which included some of the basics from a 1950s Egyptian love ballad, the flute notes which are allegedly taken from 'Khosara Khosara ' sparked the dispute. Hit-maker Jay Z and producer Timbaland, who have compiled 25 Grammy Awards, are being sued by Osama Ahmed Fahmy, Baligh Hamdi 's
The Jury asked if Aereo had the right to make wealth off recording the content and stated that in 1976, the Congress had approved for documenting the Copyright law to cover any process or device that exists or believed to exist in future for the broadcast signal to be retransmitted (PBS, 2014). The defense showed the worth of Sony Betamax case where the Court’s verdict facilitated future innovation (PBS, 2014). But in June 2014, the SC ruled that Aereo has infringed the Copyright law by reversing the district court’s decision and gave ruling that Aereo had carried out ‘publicly’ works by petitioners and Aereo’s service enables users to watch TV programs, most of which have copyright protection (Chappell, 2014). The Court, in its decision, refused to apply the analysis it used in prior cases of copyright violation including those technologically aided transmission such as direct breach has to include an action of volitional behavior aimed at copyrighted content. Post its SC defeat in June, Aereo decided to shelve all its services (Lee,
I agree, Lawrence Lessig 's essay discussed the history of piracy rather than the ethical views of piracy. The title of his essay is taken from a popular Marilyn Monroe movie, Some Like it Hot. The playful honesty of this controversial topic was refreshing and eye opening from his point of view and
Does the open source culture relate to human morality and instinct? These two topics may seem strange to compare to some people. However, this essay will demonstrate how the topic of human instinct presented in the text The Origins of Virtue by Matt Ridley very closely relates to the idea of open source culture presented in the essay Homesteading the Noosphere by Eric Steven Raymond. This essay will dive deep into ideas presented in Ridley’s text and relate these ideas to Raymond’s essay. There are many topics and ideas presented in Ridley’s text that strongly support the ideas presented in Raymond’s paper.
The music industry is arguably one of the most interchangeable industries within society. The way music is produced and consumed has changed on numerous occasions over the past century and it is fair to say that the media has played a significant part in influencing those changes. Thus, the media artefact in which I will be analysing is perhaps the latest music platform to question the way in which we consume our preferred choice of music. Spotify is a digital music service that allows you to listen to any song from any artist online for free and to share your music tastes in the social networks.
We can’t purchase media from a different region and play it in our own region; we have to purchase it from a specific region. As mentioned in class, we are given the key to such media but we are still locked out from using our product with other devices. Flint does not believe the DRM can prevent piracy. As mentioned before, “hackers” can circumvent the system and in order to prevent these circumvention big companies, such as Sony, would have to install chips into all media devices to regulate what we do with our devices. In order to truly prevent “piracy”, new regulations concerning the use of computers, tablets, scanners, and other capturing devices would have to be implemented worldwide.
Individuals are freed by science, but the social organizations didn’t change. Some commodities, music for an example, can be downloaded or shared freely among individuals. Those higher in power find ways to stop it by enabling copyright ownership and restrictions. One of the ways was rent. Rent is a type of tribute that is imposed above the price of production.
The film is an example of Cultural Imperialism in many ways. America has always been the country too, but in and take over everything. America is a place where you can be told to go home based on the color of your skin and not by the content of your character. Yet, America still feels entitled to always be able to go to another country and invade it. Even if it 's not by blood they feel that they have to have some sort of sang in other countries cultures.
Even in the earliest phases of the film’s production, Preminger made sure to alert the public through industry trade papers like Motion Picture Daily that the film’s script had been rejected by the PCA, which was at the time directed to do so by Federal Commissioner of Narcotics Harry Anslinger. This meant from the outset, Preminger and United Artists were quite candid about the volatility of the film’s subject matter, explicitly confirming it violated the parts of the Code concerned with the presentation of drug use. This transparency about the fight with the MPAA continued throughout the rest of the production process up until the PCA’s inevitable rejection of the final cut of the film in late November 1955. In another openly defiant act, United Artists then severed ties with the MPAA in order to continue distribution of the film without its consent. In addition, Preminger spoke with vitriol about the organization in Variety saying, “I don’t see why I should accept the rules of a private club to which I don’t even
It followed domestic debates about the intellectual property of literary works. It is only in 1777, promoted by Beaumarchais, and in 1790, with the Article 1, Section 8 in the U.S. Constitution, also known as the Copyright Act, that the French and American intellectual property laws were created. Since the 1886 Berne Convention, and then with the creation of the UN World Intellectual Property Organization agency in 1967, IP laws have acquired an international dimension, which one can argue is consistent with the constant globalisation of the creative and cultural industries. All IP laws share a common definition of ‘copyright’, characterised by WIPO as “a legal term used to describe the rights that creators have over their literary and artistic works”. The varied copyrighted works include ‘literary works, computer programs, films, music, choreographies, artistic works, architecture, advertisements, maps, and technical drawings’ (Wipo.int, n.d.).
A new surge is being seen and fair use in copyright is happening, when mass copying of all books throughout the world undertaken by Google books project is declared as fair use by the US conceding copying of whole book/s without the consent of copyright owner. Canada amplified its 2004 position of permission to copy from single copies to multiple copies and further permitted previews to be streamed without paying royalty to owners of music. In Alberta Education v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency and Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Bell Canada the position in CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada is taken further. According to proposition at hand where Cambridge and Oxford University Press along