When is comes to both Functionalist and Conflicts I lean more towards the side of the Functionalist in all aspects of family, school and medical care. In our society we offer things like free education and medical care that every Canadian citizen has a right to, therefore the wealth of a person does not determine whether or not they receive this interest, everyone has a right to this.
When it comes to the institution of Family, I believe that this serves to all members of society. People are joined together based on common interests and love for one another, the wealths and status of a person should not determine whether or not they choose to love one another. Though, if wealth and status was the sole reason why a person why a person choose
…show more content…
This act does not alter regarding whether a person is of dominant economic class or not, and is the same for everyone. Therefore I believe that this institution is solely operated to serve the interests of all members of society. This institution does not create any means of wealth, but takes millions away each year therefore the ongoing of this institution is only in operation to heap all members of society, especially the children. Even in the case of Universities and Colleges, I still believe this is in the sole interest of all members of society. Although, it is not free to receive this education, our funds come straight back to us. Universities are all non-profit organizations that only exists to provide educations for people who wish to do so. Even if a person does not have all of the funds to pay for post secondary education, they have different opportunities to pursue one because there care organizations that offer money for students that cannot afford it. An example of an organization that does this is, OSAP which stands for “Ontario Student Assistance Program” that offers loans, grants and other financial aids to help those who cannot afford post secondary education. Therefore I believe that the institution of education in Canada is only in operation to help all members of society, to create a more education nation and thus a higher, education
To begin, the author impressively outlines a logical reason as to why society should be liable for funding higher education. In her essay she
Philippines and Canada are two different economic spectrum. The former has historically struggled with poverty from the period of colonization to today’s rapid globalization with poverty incidence of 21.6% as of 2014 (PSA, 2016). Canada, on the other hand, has 9.7% rate of low income but majority of those are transitory. From 2005-2010, only 1.5% are considered in persistent low income (Statistics Canada, 2015 as cited by Lamman, & McIntyre, 2016). Beyond these numbers, there remains a grim reality that faced citizens within the poverty thresholds from both nations.
Now more than 30 million people lives in 10 provinces and 2 federal territories of Canada. Canada’s two major cultures are English and French as Quebec is the central province and the heart of French Canada. There are three major theories in sociology and two of these theories are functionalism and conflict theory. Functionalists
“Poverty must not be a bar to learning and learning must be an escape from poverty” this was said by Lyndon B Johnson in 1964 and the problem he was addressing back then, has grown and become far larger and more destructive. The average Canadian student acquires 27,000$ of debt trying to earn what in our society today is necessary, to live a safe, happy and fulfilling life. Without higher education you are not likely to be able to do what you want with your life. Within the last two decades university prices have doubled and along with it so have interest rates. This enforces and maintains the trend of the rich staying rich and the poor staying poor; because of the high price less wealthy people are unlikely to be able to afford university and get a good job.
All individuals have certain social roles that when working together, form society, this allows for there to be inequality amongst individuals. Functionalism also says that social order is maintained through public consensus. So, the adjustments that the public makes in response to deviant behavior, allow for change within this theory. About Mean Girls, functionalist would view all the different groups in this movie as necessary to the functionality of high school. There are many different groups in the movie, for example the lunchroom scene shows us these separate groups.
I think the functionalism is more congruent with social values and ethics because it’s structures have the potential for the betterment of humanity if they function. If people affected by poverty can adapt to environmental changes, likewise human social structures have this same capability to succeed like people not living in poverty. I would suggest a program that would help the under skilled individuals increase their levels of existing skills by working with a higher level person that would be paid for in labor and time this way people are making more money without having to get it right back to government in form of paying for education. I suggest a policy that allows working people to stay on welfare for a year to get back on their feet and unemployed recipients 2 years giving them time to find work, education to get off of the system and living
Defining moments are what shape and help develop a person through stages of their life. These important moments in life are not limited to just people. All things, including Canada have had many defining moments that still have an impact on modern society. The battle of Vimy Ridge granted Canada a global reputation and gave Prime Minister Robert Borden the push towards independence. The FLQ October Crisis was a terroristic incident that stopped Quebec independence.
One main point of the structural functionalism theory is that the erection of a family directly impacts their likelihood of living in poverty. According to Macionis et al stated that the structural-functionalist perspective, poverty, and economic inequality serve several positive functions for society (Macionis et al 2015). Davis and Moore (1945) argued that because the various occupational roles in society require various levels of ability, expertise, and knowledge, an unequal economic reward system helps to assure that the person who performs a role is the most qualified.
When Prime Minister Wilfrid Laurier stated, “As the 19th century was that of the United States, so I think the 20th century shall be filled by Canada”, the decades that followed provided his statement to be true as Canada became an independent and strong nation. The battlefields in World War One were a defining moment for Canada as their forces fought as one nation for the first time, instead of under British Command. Also, at the end of the war, Canada was recognized at the Peace Conference and signed the Treaty of Versailles as an independent country. In addition, Canada joined the League of Nations, playing a major role in world politics. These events in the early 20th century allowed the beginning of a strong nation with a growing national
In other words, functionalists like Durkheim believed that for a society to survive, its various social processes must come together to meet the system’s needs. Functionalists implement Durkheim’s outlook of a unified social scheme with various elements having a function within
The functionalism theory is a macro-level theory. It sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote equilibrium and stability. These parts may be functional, which means that the society has beneficial consequences. They may also be dysfunctional, which means that society will have negative consequences. Both of these together will create equilibrium among the society, which
For instance, the percentage of Canadians aged twenty-five to sixty-four with post-secondary education in 2006 was 60.1% and in 2011 the percentage was 64.1%” (Baisakhi). These statistics exemplify the success rate of the gradual progress the current education system is making on the students in the nation, especially if one considers the difference in annual earnings for full-time working twenty-five to thirty-two year-olds. Graduates that obtain bachelor degrees make a median of 17,000 dollars more compared to their less educated counterparts (Baisakhi). Overall, Canada’s variety of educational opportunities allow individuals to thrive in
Canada was originally founded on July 1, 1867. At that time only four provinces existed. Today, there are ten provinces. They government that exists in Canada is mainly a parliamentary democracy. Canada is governed by a Prime Minister who holds the executive power.
Functionalist believe there are distinct roles that are better suited for both males and females. Men’s roles are to be the breadwinners of the family and women’s roles are to be the care takers of the family. As a result of these rules being carried out there is gender inequality. Conflict theorists believe that the roles females and males are solely based on the ideal that males want to remain in control and dominate society. Conflict theorists believe that males seek to remain in control and the dominate sex so that they can continue to only work for paid jobs.
The reason I think this way is that in this case everyone gets a chance to go to the university and that free education can interest more students in the long run and finally lead to more people getting a higher education. Universities in a number of developing countries are very expensive and this scares a lot of potential students since for most of them, getting university education means that they will have to get student loans and be in debt for a long period of time. If universities would provide free education, then, not only those young people who come from rich families but everyone who wants to study in the university will have an equal opportunity to receive a graduate