"
Internet Surveillance to Information Manipulation
When people hear the words “internet surveillance,” most seem to assume the worst possible scenario. Visions from the dystopian novel 1984, where George Orwell creates an allegorical reflection of the totalitarianism in Stalinist Russia immediately come to mind. By comparing the novel to internet surveillance today, it becomes clear that the benefits that could come from governmental internet surveillance are outweighed by the potential dangers; however in a virtual world that holds the keys to the lives of millions across not only the United States, but the whole planet, the opportunity to use surveillance to prevent terrorism, crime, and even bullying seems too hard to pass up. In order
…show more content…
In today‚Äôs world where ‚Äúfake news‚Äù runs rampant and every tweet from the the President of the United States needs to be fact-checked, manipulation of the past seems eerily familiar. In the words of Winston, ‚Äúwhen memory failed and written records were falsified...the claim of the [government] to have improved the conditions of human life had...to be accepted‚Äù (Orwell 93). With the claim that internet surveillance will improve society, whether through prevention of terrorism or hate speech, who is to say that this is not just an Orwellian manipulation of information to create the illusion of good? In reality, by monitoring the activities of people online, companies such as Facebook, Google, and Twitter are able to find what makes their sites addicting, and then correlate those factors with advertisements, and news releases. Former Silicon Valley tech executive Justin Rosenstein, has even blocked himself off completely from social media as he has discovered the addiction and dangerous information manipulation that it creates. From cookies to preference monitoring, there are many ways people are already being surveyed. The problem is that often people are unaware of the surveillance, or take little notice of it. In order for internet surveillance to be morally acceptable for any level of government, people need …show more content…
On a local level, cyberbullying could be discovered among school children, and could be used to reach out to suicide-prone people in need of help. On a state level, surveillance could be used to find missing children and people, and finding keys to lowering crime rates in specific communities. On a federal level, wanted criminals could be tracked and potential shooters or terrorists could be discovered. Considering the amount of natural disasters that occured in 2017, internet surveillance could also be used to discover areas in need of help and rescue. In total, however, with the note of the Trump FCC in December of 2017 to dissolve net neutrality, internet manipulation is too large of a possibility. Despite the benefits governmental surveillance could possess, the laws that prevent invasion of privacy or manipulation simply do not exist. Perhaps if laws such as those were passed, than internet surveillance could be considered justified, however, considering the current situation of the United States, it currently is not. As of now, an Orwellian world seems a too close for comfort, and internet surveillance would only worsen the
In the digital age, social media platforms have become an integral part of our daily lives. Facebook, the world's largest social network, has been the subject of intense scrutiny over the years due to its handling of user data and privacy concerns. In a recent article published on Vox, titled "Facebook’s data collection tactics and algorithms threaten our privacy and democracy," author Rani Molla explores the ways in which Facebook's data collection and algorithmic systems pose a threat to both user privacy and democratic values. Through a combination of rhetorical strategies, Molla successfully argues that Facebook's actions represent a clear danger to both individuals and society as a whole.
We the people are being monitored and controlled every day by “Big Brother” or what we call it our government. Our society today is also filled with false information and fake news. Michiko Kakutani says it best in the article, “It’s an era in which misinformation and fake news have proliferated on the web.” Since it is difficult to determine what is fake or real news it keeps people uninformed, which could be an advantage to the government. By the people not knowing the real news or by being distracted by the fake news makes it ten times easier for the government to get away with scandals, actions, decisions, and much more.
Anthem is a novel by Ayn Rand about the ban of the idea of a single person existing. Instead, the idea was that the entire society was one person. There was a strict list of taboo words and things that weren't allowed in this community. I've been given one modern thing that “has been banned.” Use of the internet.
While there are still debates on the exact scope of government surveillance, the fact that there have been steps taken to limit its excesses shows that the United States values individual rights. As technology advances and security threats evolve, it will be important for policymakers to continue to evaluate the role of surveillance in national security and ensure that privacy protections are not sacrificed in the name of
US internet use has not declined at all since Edward Snowden’s leakage of the NSA’s operations in 2013. According to Internet Live Stats, US internet usage has increased at about 17.8 million new users per year, mostly for miscellaneous reasons. According to Scott Public Relations, the 3 most popular uses for the internet by far are social networking, gaming, and emailing, constituting 41.9% of the total time Americans spend online. Representatives there is no need to investigate the NSA. They are one of our few feasible defenses against terrorism today, and we cannot afford to lose it.
“Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy, and the Dark Side of the Internet,” written by Ronald J. Deibert, outlines different issues and benefits that have arised due to the growing use of the internet. Deibert begins his essay providing information about the internet such as the rapid growth of smartphones, how the internet has taken over most of societies lives, and key differences between previous technological innovations compared to the internet. He continues his essay by discussing the U.S.A. Patriot Act and how this law should be retracted based on the fact that various companies, like Google, can give the government our personal searches if they ask. Then, he talks about various types of cyber crimes and how we need stronger regulations to control the internet so these crimes would not be possible. Deibert concludes his essay explaining how the internet has provided many benefits in today’s nation, but the internet needs stricter regulations for our own protection.
With that in mind, many people express their political views through the internet and more and more people are organizing through sites like Facebook and Twitter. The omnipresence of internet use in society today makes it seem like a given that the government should use it to be aware of the population’s ever changing opinions. It is still an invasion of privacy to survey social media, but, that being said, people may give up their right to privacy when they publicly post information. It is up to the individual to protect their right by making their account private or not posting anything they do not want
The U.S. government is invading the privacy of its’ citizens through the use of mobile devices such as phones and laptops. This use of privacy invasion is similar to the technology used in George Orwell’s novel 1984. What makes today relate to 1984 is how the government tracks us through location, voice, and messaging. George Orwell’s 1984 has a totalitarian government that can track its’ citizens through location with the use of telescreens. In the novel, telescreens can track your location in a room through a telescreen, which is demonstrated by Winston´s thought ¨so long as you remained within the field of vision … you could be seen¨ (Orwell, page 3).
Essay 3 Prompt: How has social media impacted American culture? Thesis statement: Social media has become a common staple and main way of communication in American culture and this impact has affected not only adults, but children of all ages. Outline: Introduction: Examining the way in which the use of social media has influenced and thus impacted American culture.
“Scary. But a good idea. Most parents won’t even consider it,” Harlan Coben states about spyware. In his opinion article, “The Undercover Parent”, Harlan Coben, author and columnist, expresses to his audience that they should monitor their kids and pro using spyware, but with the condition of making children aware it’s there.
Big brother implies the authority that regulates and monitors information and citizens. Currently, technology developments such as closed-circuit television, black box, cell phone, and a bunch of search engines, allow to record every moves that people make and to give rise to surveillance society. Surveillance society has two sides of the coin. In this essay, I will deliver pros and cons about surveillance society and possible solutions to deal with the issue.
People may be aware that today’s world is becoming closer to the totalitarian world in Orwell’s novel 1984. In Peter Maass, and Megha Rajagopalah article “That’s no Phone. That’s my Tracker.” Maas and Rajagopalah state, “Noted that GPS data can reveal whether a person is a weekly church goer, a heavy drinker, a regular at the gym, unfaithful husband, an outpatient receiving medical treatment, an associate of particular individual or political group-and not just one such fact about a person”. Technology nowadays knows a person better than their own friends or family.
"Current Event The government monitors the citizens of the United States in order to collect data, and protect the nation. The duties of the US government, national, state and local, are to secure the citizens it represents and to aide commerce. The internet, an open, global network, has become an integral part of the US commerce, the media, and the local, state and national security. Although it may seem that U.S. Federal Government, should not have rights or duties to monitor a computer network that spans the globe, without this monitoring, improper commerce, chaos caused by communication over the internet, and even terrorism may become rampant. There are many differing points of view with regards to how companies and individuals should
Agencies watch the things we post in order to catch criminals and make sure terrorists have little control in convincing. Now this can be a good thing but if the power goes to far it could be a violation of our rights and privacy. Which goes against the constitution. The government should have limits to how much power they have on the internet for the safety and rights of our people. A good thing is to realize what rights we have on the internet and watch what we post.
Surveillance and privacy Surveillance and privacy are two terms that don’t match so much. Nowadays our society is made up of people who are fond of showing themselves off in any occasion, in a gamut of ways, from social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, the most recent Instagram, to wearing nothing at all in order to look amazingly cool and “way-to-go people”. I’m not buttoned-down, absolutely, and I don’t want people to bundle themselves up. It’s no use.