ipl-logo

Gideon V Wainwright Case Summary

631 Words3 Pages

Countless people are getting placed in the criminal justice system on meager charges. Then, the system offers them “Legal Misrepresentation,” even though Gideon v. Wainwright (Alexander, 2012, p. 85) stated that they are entitled to an attorney if they are accused of a serious crime and indigent. Yet, public defendant attorneys lack resources and are overburdened with a substantial caseload that they cannot give defendants suitable representation. Subsequently, these accused people are forced into a plea deal to offset spending the mandatory maximum sentences in prison. Bad Deal This is a “Bad Deal” suggested Alexander. She explores how the lack of representation ends into a plea deal by the prosecutor in a manner of giving the accused a favor. Even though, it locks a person in to only convicting him/herself. She knows that the prosecutor has the ultimate decision to dismiss or add additional charges, which holds the key to his/her life. I agree with Alexander because the prosecutor is like the ‘god of the courts.” Defendants asked for leniency and the prosecutor offers a deal and they take it because they are tired of sitting in jail, but few realize that by taking …show more content…

Some people who were convicted for selling drugs were supporting their drugs habits. She suggested they would be better suited in a treatment facility. I concur, as a substance abuse counselor, I encountered many drug dealing addicts. It’s important for them to gain sobriety and develop positive coping skills. They cannot accomplished this by sitting in jail because many jails are ill-equipped for treatment. Alexander also points again the severity of drug charges which includes numerous years to life in prison and she supports her claim with cases Harmelin v. Michigan and Lockyer v. Andrade and the Eighth Amendment of cruel and unusual punishment (Alexander, 2012, p.

Show More
Related

  • Example Of Larry Servedio Case

    619 Words  | 3 Pages

    In today's era, when a criminal is charged for various crimes their given a shortcut to justice by simply accepting a plea deal. In this case, Larry Servedio faces multiple felonies: first-degree kidnapping, first-degree rape, third-degree rape, third-degree criminal sexual act, third-degree criminal mischief, criminal impersonation, second-degree grand larceny, and second-degree strangulation. Servedio was also indicted for several misdemeanor charges: first-degree harassment, second-degree aggravated harassment, second-degree menacing and torturing and injuring an animal. If Mr. Servedio goes to trial and is able to prove his innocence of the charges pressed against him, then he is a free man and all charges get dropped. Yet, if Mr. Servedio

    Read More

  • Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

    589 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gideon v. Wainwright Clark, 1 Gideon v. Wainwright: The Right to Counsel Amber Clark Liberty High School 2A Gideon v. Wainwright was a Supreme Court case involving Clarence Earl Gideon, a man who received felony charges in the state of Florida for breaking and entering to commit a misdemeanor offense. The importance of this case lies in the Constitutional questions it dealt with, such as a citizen?s right to counsel, and the resulting decision that gave the right to counsel to all, at any court level. Gideon?s case was argued on January 15th, 1963.

    Read More

  • Brian Banks Case Paper

    644 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this case, how do we reconcile the benefits of plea bargaining with the importance of justice? Our criminal justice system is a system where “95% of criminal defendants plead guilty to the charges against them” whether they are guilty or not (pg 11).

    Read More

  • Essay On Gideon V. Cochron

    851 Words  | 4 Pages

    The decision overturned Betts v. Brady, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person hauled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.”  He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law . . . cannot be realized if

    Read More

  • 14th Amendment Pros And Cons

    996 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Bill of Rights was introduced into America's system of government along with the Constitution in order to appease Anti-Federalists that wanted to ensure the protection of their rights. The 14th Amendment was later added to guarantee due process and equal protection rights. The Bill of Rights and 14th Amendment are extremely effective in protecting the rights of all citizens and are most clearly shown in the 1st, 5th, and 6th Amendments. The full expanse of the 1st Amendment and the freedoms it provides have been debated since its implementation, but its involvement in Texas v. Johnson was a key step in setting the proper precedent for its use.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    652 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both sides will carefully weigh the strength of their case and decide whether it is prudent to go to trial. The prosecution may also consider the publicity surrounding the case and whether there is public pressure to prosecute that particular defendant to the full extent of the law. The defense will consider the individual defendant’s desire to go to trial and the seriousness of the potential sentence. The Pros of Plea Bargaining

    Read More

  • Plea Bargaines Case Study

    483 Words  | 2 Pages

    When a person enters into a plea bargain agreement after coviented of a crime, that person who is being prosecuted have to make importants decisions. One of the most key decisions is how that person plead (Guilty or Not).“A plea is formal statement made on behalf of an accused person or made by the accused in court in response to the charge made against him” (Martin, 2003). Before a defendant plea Guilty or Not he/she have to enters into a plea bargains. A plea bargains are an agreement in a criminal case between the accuse person (defendant) and prosecutor usually involves the defendant pleading guilt in order to get reduced sentence, in stead of the case going before a jury. When a defendant accept a plea bargain he/she is giving up their Sixth Amendment to the United State Constituation.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargains In Court Cases

    95 Words  | 1 Pages

    Here is the first problem that needs to be addressed, the Sixth Amendment, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial…” only thing fast are plea bargains, but they are surely not fair. The problem is we need plea bargains, because if not then we be having court cases running 24/7, and one judge would be hearing 100 cases a day. This is why plea bargains account for roughly 90% of all criminal cases. Here are three reasons why plea bargains are supposed to be in

    Read More

  • Plea Bargaining In Court Cases

    534 Words  | 3 Pages

    PLEA BARGAINING Plea bargaining is a process of negotiation and results in a plea agreement between the defendant and the prosecutor for lesser charges. Basically, plea bargaining circumvents the trial process by evading more serious charges. About 97% of federal cases and 94% of state cases are disposed of by this method without ever going to trial. There can be advantages and disadvantages to this.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargaining In Criminal Cases

    601 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the United States court system, many criminal cases are not resolved in a timely manner. One of the more common ways in which many cases are resolved quickly is through plea bargaining. Plea bargaining is defined as an agreement between defense attorneys and prosecutors. (Spohn & Hemmens, 2012) Alschuler (1979) describes plea bargaining as the self-conviction act of a defendant. Today, approximately ninety percent of defendants plead guilty because of plea bargaining.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargain: Ethical And Legal Case Study

    281 Words  | 2 Pages

    • A large majority of criminal cases end in a plea bargain. The incentive for a prosecutor to offer or agree to accept a plea bargain it believed to equal a reduction trial caseload for prosecutors. By definition a prosecutor is a officer of the court who institutes legal proceedings in a court of law. The prosecutor must be moral and ethical in his or her practices. Prosecutor’s decision on evidence should be inclined to proceed with moral and ethical reasoning.

    Read More

  • Different Types Of Plea Bargaining

    950 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plea Bargaining Paper Plea bargaining is defined as an agreement between a prosecutor and a defendant whereby the defendant is allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge rather than risk conviction for a grave crime in order to avoid a protracted trial or to win the defendant's cooperation as a witness ("Plea Bargaining", 2014). A plea bargain can make a substantial difference in the sentencing outcome of a defendant. The prosecution uses this type of bargaining for leverage against the defendant. This means the defendant can be offered to give a testimony of the events that can eventually lead to a charge and conviction of a higher profiled case.

    Read More

  • Purpose Of Plea Bargaining

    503 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the Oxford Dictionary of Law, plea bargaining is to be defined as "an agreement between the prosecution and the defense by which the accused agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge in return for an offer by the prosecution" This entails that the two sides of the criminal case will come together in agreement of a punishment without having the case go to trial (Plea bargaining, 2015). II . Discuss the purpose of plea bargaining and the impact this practice has on the criminal justice system. According to the American Bar Association, plea bargaining is prevalent due to several factors.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Plea Bargaining

    946 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thus, plea bargaining is a major factor in the grief of many families across the nation. “The very essence of deterrence is credibility.” (Source C) Criminals set back into society

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

    1186 Words  | 5 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

    Read More

More about Gideon V Wainwright Case Summary

Open Document