There are also problems because GM crops have toxins in them. While they are meant to deter pests, they can end up hurting good insects and birds as well. Besides this, there will ultimately be pests that emerge which will be able to resist the toxins. Rendering that benefit of the GM crop useless. Beside the problems stemming from the fact these crops are genetically modified, there are other problems because of mono-cropping.
What on Earth is Pharming? Pharming is “the production of pharmaceuticals by genetically engineered plants or animals,”(Merriam-Webster.com). Pharming has many different aspects. There is modifying plants and there is modifying animals. When people modify plants they are changing a certain trait to help the crop grow efficiently in different environments.
Technological advancements in the scientific field have led to the advent of genetic engineering, including the genetic modification (GM) of food that may hold the key to the solution of many existing problems like food shortage, world hunger and genetic diseases. Uzogara (2000) state that the intentional attempt to alter the genetic make-up of plants or animals is known as genetic modification. Scientists have shown the potential benefits that those genetically engineered crops can bring about such as increased shelf-life in Flavr Savr Tomato and pest-resistant Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn, which are said to benefit the producers. From the consumers’ point of view, what matters most is the health benefits that genetically engineered crops will bring about, which wild-type food crops may not be able to do.
One of the main health problems that concern many scientists is that the genetically modified organism may pass on mutant genes to bacteria in your GI tract. Yet, we do not know what would happen if the bacteria in your gastrointestinal tract were mutated. Another bad thing about GMOs is that they cross-pollinate with other seeds nearby. Thus, GMOs can contaminate organic and non-GMO farmers crops’. So why are GMOs approved by the FDA if they are so dangerous?
The great thing about GMOs lies in the ability to produce a lot of food especially in a time where the world needs it the most. However through the process of producing these high yields of food, one must wonder at what cost? Throughout researching GMOs, I realized just how much we rely on GMOs without even realizing it. On the flipside, the findings on how just how harmful they can be is alarming. My findings overall is that everyone will lean either one way or the other, but I do not believe this is topic that can have a distinct wrong and right.
I like to think of it as a copy and paste mechanism where you take information from one source and paste it into another source to get a certain outcome. Pro-GMO groups like GMOs because they could help end hunger because of increasing crop yields and like within the golden rice, increase nutrition such as beta-carotene content which is turned into vitamin A by our bodies. However, Anti-GMO groups dislike GMOs because they fear
The proposed goal of GMOs is to increase food production. This will supposedly in turn lower food costs, and make it easier to distribute food to feed poor populations around the world. However research shows that global food production has increased enough to, “feed 10 billion people”, one and a half times more than what we need to feed every single person on Earth (The Huffington Post). And yet with this charming initiative having been accomplished, there are still groups of people going hungry everyday. This is not to say that companies like Monsanto are to blame for leaving people hungry or in poverty, but it questions if their goals are based on true concern.
That is basically why they were created were to help benefit our body better than they normally would. Thanks to GMO the food has built a resistance to insects and the sickness the insects could be transporting which in terms could keep an outbreak of sickness at bay. They have a tolerance for herbicide so the plant is not effected when we try to maintain a healthy surrounding in order to ensure good nutrition and no possible toxins to humans. They also have a tolerance for hot weather, cold weather, and dry weather such as a drought so if climate change gets more severe our foods should be able to survive longer and still produce the food we need to survive. Lastly, the crops would be able to yield enough to support a large amount of people considering that Earth is starting to becoming overly populated.
New kinds of foods called genetically modified organisms, also known as GMOs, has been creating concerns in the American market for the past several years. Scientists today are able to produce new foods by transferring genes from one organism to another. This technique has been developed to improve the shelf life, nutritional content, flavor, color, and texture of foods. While true, people argue that Organic foods are healthier and more beneficial to the human body and the planet than GMOs. Organic foods are described to be grown in gardens, unprocessed, and unrefined.
The prices of the crop would be lower as well since there would be a larger yield. An example of this is corn, a common GMO. The manipulation of genes that have formed genetically modified corn has allowed it to become widely available to consumers because of its increase in numbers and decrease in price. If the genetically modified strain of cabbage would be more expensive, the economy and social aspect would be affected in a negative way since people would be unable to afford it and would no longer be able to eat cabbage. The final factor that would need to be taken into consideration is the environmental impact of a GMO.
Monarchs might as well be the most advantageous species on the planet because they help pollinate plants which produces our crops and provides a food source for birds and small reptiles. However, they’re facing some complications thats decreasing the population like habitat loss, climate change, chemical pollutants, poaching/farming, and public awareness. Herbicide are the monarchs biggest threat. People have thought of asking state and local representatives to scale down of unnecessary mowing and herbicide application, promoting agricultural methods that doesn’t kill milkweeds and other plants that pollinators need, and plant milkweeds in areas that aren’t available. The monarch is a milkweed butterfly in the family of Nymphalidae.
Genetically modifying food is a relatively new method of enhancing plants as genes are transferred between organisms. Once the desired gene is identified in the organism’s genome, it can be cut out, transferred to the target plant, and pasted into its genome. Many authors have written about scientists who attempt to transform nature and its entities. For example, in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Birthmark” and “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” organisms are modified throughout the respective stories. Essentially, the modification of each individual in the two works results in detrimental effects such as death and poisoning caused by toxic substances.
With superior positive environmental impact, quality and quantity of GM crops, why would anyone oppose them? The reason to support genetically modified crops is that they produce a superior amount of whatever they supply. Ian Murnaghan says that the increased production could be used to feed people in developing countries or overpopulated areas where enough food is not steadily available. The seeds of these plants may cost more, but the maintenance cost decreases significantly. Each type of seed was designed by bioengineers, who in a way “Copy and Pasted” the desired genes and traits, which is why they cost more.
Then that answer is a genetically modified organism or food. “Are organisms that have undergone some changes to their DNA through genetic engineering” (Reference). Which means it is a food that has had something about its appearance, taste, smell, and much more changed. This isn 't a natural thing to happen either, so why put so much work into changing something, and does that mean it 's dangerous? So you would think how could gmos be dangerous?