Heralded the ‘Father of Modern Warfare’ by some historians, Gustavus Adolphus succeeded as an innovative military administrator, battlefield commander and tactician. Adolphus owes much of his success to his predecessor, (Prince) Maurice of Nassau, and learned by studying the different aspects of the Western way of war as implemented by Prince Maurice and the Dutch military. The concept of the Western way of war identifies its military superiority on such principles as advancement in technology and weaponry, discipline, dominant military tradition, innovation and the ability to finance war. Maurice of Nassau left his mark on history and advanced Western war by implementing discipline and officer development, continuous unit training …show more content…
However, arguably no other leader expanded upon the Western principles of warfare to the degree that Adolphus did. He distinguished his army from that of his contemporaries by staffing his force with a conscript army that was lightly armed, highly maneuverable and mobile establishing the first real standing national army. He was the first military leader to appreciate and implement shock and fire, and realized its devastating effects when combined with other technological advancements of Western war. Most importantly, however, was the manner in which Adolphus aligned battlefield weaponry, coordinated his fighting formations and strategy while fielding trained, disciplined soldiers to form what could be considered the first real war machine. Adolphus redefined the aspects of Western war by fielding a well-disciplined standing army, which could attack with overwhelming shock and fire utilizing a lighter, more mobile tactical formation. Although Gustavus Adolphus’ ideas were not unique to him, his innovative approach to war fighting reform ultimately culminated into a lethal army that proved decisive at the Battle of Breitenfield in 1631, leaving his mark on history and modern war as we know it …show more content…
Arguably, this philosophy of war, which significantly expanded upon the principles of Western war, was unique to Adolphus. He recognized the importance of infantry firepower and its role on the battlefield. Historian Liddell Hart believed that Adolphus’ focus on support and coordination between infantry, cavalry and use of artillery was the foundational basis of combined tactics. His reforms added more musketeers to his regiments, and his soldiers were equipped with a superior, lighter musket that allowed for faster rates of fire and mobility, further supporting a tactical counter-march. His regiments each had its own lighter and more mobile field artillery cannons, thereby increasing the formations speed, maneuverability and close artillery support it provided to the fighting formation. His shock warfare reform added entire regiments of musketeer augmentees embedded with cavalry raids. Adolphus trained his cavalry to charge at a gallop, simultaneously softening the enemy with a barrage of artillery fire. When fighting formations approached at close range, three tiered ranks of musketeers would fire simultaneous salvos at the enemy delivering a wall of bullet fire. The physical devastation of this firepower could turn the tides of war; however, this might have had its greatest benefit on destroying the
My men’s quick loading and re-firing of their muskets also made my army seem much larger. Hamilton soon surrendered. He then asked me where the rest of my men were since he could not believe my militia was so small. I proudly replied, “They stand before you.”
Britain practiced this style of fighting, as it had worked for them in the past. The Patriots had adopted an old, yet new to them, style of fighting from the Natives called Guerrilla Warfare largely inspired by Francis “Swamp Fox” Marion. Americans imposed surprise attacks or had riflemen in woods that could pick off British officers from a distance, although this went against “gentleman’s warfare”. In the Battle of Trenton, General Washington and his troops crossed the Delaware River into Trenton and attacked German Hessians based there on Christmas morning. The Hessians
This tactic, guerrilla warfare, was first seen in the French and Indian war against the British (Keesee 90). Armies used to fight on opposing sides, and just used to fire and reload (Geist). However, with guerilla warfare, armies hid in the woods or forest, and hurt the enemy from a distance (Currie). Though this seemed cowardly, it was an effective way of George Washington’s generals to use their smaller size to their advantage
Kevin Marcotte Mr. Eaton Period: G 3/6/17 Guerilla tactics of the American Colonials helped their war effort Anyone who knows anything about the American Revolution knows that the Colonist’s militias were known for their battle tactics. They had multiple different tactics but most commonly know is their guerilla warfare tactics. Guerilla tactics were a major reason for the victory of the war. Instead of the traditional warfare Britain used guerilla tactics were more successful due to its sense of surprise.
According to Clausewitz, military commanders must first be aware of the three most important strategic objectives of war: (1) to conquer and destroy the armed power of the enemy; (2) to take possession of his material and other sources of strength, and (3) to gain public opinion.1 To attain the strategic objectives, Clausewitz requires the application of three decisive military principles: military commanders must apply unrelenting pressure and energy to defeat the enemy; military commanders must mass combat power against the enemy’s vulnerability, creating or revealing additional weaknesses that the attacking force can exploit; and commanders must capitalize on speed, surprise, and shock to destroy the enemy. Clausewitz insists that
Louis XIV used war as a tool to conquer more people and gain more land to grow the French kingdom. Peter the Great described war as important mostly for defense against Russia’s enemies and in ensuring
At Trenton the British has Hessian troops that were tired and not prepared, there are rumours of them being drunk from Christmas celebration. This battle was in the beginning part of the war. When Washington reached trenton he divided his troops up with some going on the flank. He also had cannons from Colonel Henry Knox firing at the troops in the fortress. One of the British Colonels, Johann Rall, tried to get his troops to set up a defense around the castle but was not able to.
Both sides were similar in the types of weapons used such as muskets, bayonets, cannons, some fought using pistols, sabers, and rode on horsebacks. The British soldiers were highly experienced in battle but primarily fight using linear tactics, meaning they would form in two lines and approach their opponents then engage when approximately 150 feet away. The first line fires and reloads as the second line fires, this is used because of the time necessary to reload the muskets. This type of engagement was used until the leader of either side would give the command to charge. At that moment, Soldiers would charge to the opponent and fight using bayonets and hatchets if necessary.
King Louis XIV had a goal to expand France’s borders, and he did that with a powerful army. He standardized the uniforms, weapons, and training. This was the peak of Louis XIV’s success in reforming the government. Similarly, Frederick William I, the Soliders’ King, made Prussia one of the largest militaries in Europe. He was constantly wearing his military uniform and lived a very disciplined life.
He used his determination to win battles before he was the top general he led “a bunch of who led by generals who played by the rule book”. He did not go by that unlike and it translated to win after victory after victory. Which led to the confidence of the Union soldiers
Throughout this paper it will be shown how the use of artillery can have such an effect on a battle, and how those same tactics are utilized on today’s battlefield. Throughout this nation’s history artillery has played an invaluable role in war. This role, at times, being the deciding factor for victory in battle depending on how it is employed. The employment of artillery varies
This army had well-trained officers who knew how to make their soldiers obey their orders. The soldiers were disciplined and the British army was extremely organized, yet the American’s strengths in the Battle of Yorktown over-powered the British and helped the Colonists win the Revolutionary War. The total number of soldiers fighting for the Americans were two and a half times the number of people fighting for the British. The American troops had other advantages, one being that General George Washington, who led the American troops, was an experienced leader. The American soldiers were very motivated fighters, as they tried to regain their rights they had lost as Englishmen when they left England to come to the colonies- they had a better reason to win and a worse reason to lose.
In other words he thought that the Continental army tried harder than his
King Henry uses Aristotle’s three Appeals to assuage the fears of his soldiers and to inspire unyielding confidence and passion. Two nights before a great battle to retake France’s land, King Henry of England disguises himself as a common soldier to discover the sentiment of his army. However, outnumbered and afraid of dying, the men tells the disguised King Henry about their reluctance to head into battle. Consequently, the next day, King Henry decides to raise his army’s morale through a speech. King Henry begins by appealing to the men’s sense of logic, using logos to argue that no more men are needed for the battle: “If we are mark’d to die, we are enow / to do our country loss; and if to live, / the fewer men, the greater share of honour”
SUBJECT: Information Paper 1. Purpose. To summarize the important parts of the Army White Paper, The Profession of Arms, dated 08DEC10, for the Battalion Commander of 1-22 Combined Arms Battalion (CAB). 2. Facts.