How Does Andrew Jackson Deserve To Be On US Currency

1639 Words7 Pages

Andrew Jackson Andrew Jackson can be described as a savior and a devil. He was the seventh president and made very controversial actions. James Parton states that Jackson was, “a patriot and a traitor” (Parton,1888). This shows that Jackson is an enigma, according to James Parton’s article about his life. This was concluded even though he was a war hero during the war of 1812. Although he had a questionable character the actions that he takes exemplifies the good that he does to other people and the Union.They all display that Andrew Jackson is suitable to be on U.S. currency. Andrew Jackson deserves to be on U.S. currency because he takes actions regardless of other people’s opinions about him having the main goal of bettering the nation. …show more content…

currency. This was caused by the Second National Bank opening. Eighty percent of the bank was controlled by private corporations. This wasn’t good because the private corporations only wanted to use the bank to benefit themselves. In response, Jackson sent a veto letter to Congress about the Second National Bank and even destroyed his chances of re-election. In this veto letter against the new bank, he states,”It is regretted that the rich and powerful too often bent the acts of government their selfish purposes” (Jackson, 1832). This proves Jackson’s worries for the national money because of what the private corporations would do to with bank’s money. This was because they owned more than the majority of the bank. He also shows that he is worried about the national money. As stated before he said that the rich and powerful which are the corporations often bend the rules to benefit only themselves but not to the nation. This is important to why Jackson should be on currency is because it expresses Jackson's intentions to secure the national money from the powerful corporations that will destroy the economy. This proves why he vetoed the bank and shows the good he does. Another excerpt from the bank veto letter that shows Jackson’s good intentions is that he states,”Of the twenty-five directors of the bank five are chosen by the government and twenty by citizen stockholders” (Jackson, 1832). This indicates how he is concerned again that eighty percent of the people in control of the second national bank were wealthy. This resulted in the states having no control of their own money. This is bad for the national economy as stated in the previous reasoning from Jackson’s veto letter due to their selfish mindsets. This is relevant because it illustrates how the bank is in danger and Jackson had to veto it to protect the economy. This shows

Open Document