The essay, On Laziness, by Christopher Morley, portrays his argument of why laziness is often the key to being successful. In his opening sentence, he starts by explaining how he intended to write an essay but was simply too lazy to do do. The purpose is already being expressed through his use of satire. This helps the audience apprehend how he’s portraying his meaning through his own writing style, which includes theoretical irony, satire, and use of persuasion. The use of actual laziness used to write this essay made the readers ponder and question what he was trying to say. Being lazy can sometimes end up being the best choice, and this essay is a prime example of that.
Morley used a great amount of irony throughout his essay. While he brought up multiple reasons that could persuade the reader, he didn't elaborate on any of them. This shows the
…show more content…
Today’s world would describe laziness as not doing anything productive, whereas he saw lazy as being content with who you are and what you have. Being satisfied with yourself is incredibly important. Don't necessitate things that don’t involve you in the first place. In paragraph 8, Morley introduced an argument about the Germans. He claims “If the Germans had been as lazy, as indifferent, and as righteously laissez-fairish as their neighbors the world would have been spared a great deal.”. What he's saying is that had the Germans been lazier and content with not being involved, they wouldn't of cared enough to create certain weapons, hence, lives would’ve been saved. Overall, he's suggesting that instead of forcing yourself into situations, let them reach out to you. The most accomplished people found their success by letting it come to them. Morley described this in paragraph 4, saying “The man who is really, thoroughly, and philosophically slothful is the only thoroughly happy man. It is the happy man who benefits the world. The conclusion is
That means that if Germany were to attempt an attack on a neighboring country, every other neighboring country would attack Germany back and neutralize them (Troop Levels, 1920, Doc B). Germans clearly felt vulnerable to all of their neighboring countries who were more powerful than themselves and needed to go to war to restore its military power, which would have sparked a need for restoration of the army by
This quote corresponds with me because I was eager to kill my friend in a game. In 1944 and 1945, German forces were trying to siege the town Bastogne in Belgium from the American forces as their last counteroffensive in the west. This Battle was one of the largest land battles in World War 2. The Battle
Christopher Morley achieves his purpose in the essay On Laziness by acting as though he himself is being lazy, and he also explains how laziness could enhance everyday life. Throughout this essay, he references two different people who somehow benefitted from laziness. He occasionally fails to explain his points though, which may be due to his facade of being lazy. The author seems to act lazy in this essay, frequently stopping before he fully expresses his reasoning behind his examples and leaving out some much needed detail.
Ashton Franquiz AP Lang Eairheart 4th 31st october 2016 Hots Questions What made Miller use irony a a lot in his writing, did it help his cause and purpose of writing it? Miller’s use of irony in his writing helped him get his points across and give a sense of comic relief to the readers, in his example of Proctor reciting the Ten Commandments and forgetting the one about adultery gives a laugh for the audience seeing how he was unfaithful to his wife and had an affair with Abigail. 2.
The tenacity that Great Britain showed towards the end of the war, proves his statement. He ends his speech with some powerful ideas and words that wrap up his main idea of perseverance leading to
However, as DeYoung acknowledges, “Sloth, on this view, is apathy— comfortable indifference to duty and neglect of other human beings’ needs. If you won’t work hard, you don’t care enough. Sloth becomes a sin not merely because it makes us lazy, but because of the lack of love that lies behind that laziness” (DeYoung, p. 81). In other words, there is clearly more to sloth than laziness. This vice actually seems to connect more with lack of love or indifference.
Dillard 's uses humor two times in this passage to grab the reader’s attention. The first time he used humor he said “ Doing something does not require discipline; it creates it own discipline - with a little help of caffeine”. This is funny because we all that drinking a little caffeine can make you very active or in other words hyper. The Second time Dillard uses humor he says “ You don’t lift car around the clock or write books every year”. Dillard use sarcastic humor to make us laugh, It’s sarcastic because, he’s saying that you are not going to be able to just do it, you have to work for it.
Churchill says that the war is everywhere. The war is in the cities and streets of civilians, instead of a common battlefield. Churchill talks about how the scientific technology of Britain was higher than the Nazi’s, because of the imprisonment of
He had cared so much for everyone else that in spite of horrific circumstances, he was the one who tried to make it right. Helmuth Hubener spoke out anonymously by making leaflets, or notes. The things he talked about were people should do the right things and not do wrong. He listened to the BBC, or a British Broadcast Connection, where the announcer was talking about the war.
Christopher Morley’s piece, On Laziness, presents a comical defence of philosophical lethargy with a surplus of satire though paradoxes, and formal, polysyllabic language. But the most obvious example of essay’s purposeful absurdity comes not from the diction or the arguments, but from the essay’s existence in the first place. From the very first sentence, Morley comments on how he was “too indolent...to write an essay on Laziness.” This is followed by almost nine-hundred words “in favour of a greater appreciation of Indolence”, driving home the satirical and comedic nature of the piece to the reader from the very beginning through this obvious paradox. It signals to the reader to not take the essay as a literal argument, but as a mockery of such a point of view.
Rhetorical Analysis of “Peace in the Atomic Era” The military gives people a sense of protection, which is important, but how much is too much? On February 19, 1950, Albert Einstein gave a speech at Princeton University titled “Peace in the Atomic Era”. In the speech he was discussing his opinion on what he stated was the “most important political question”. He constructed a well argument which persuaded his audience that security through ordnance isn’t a way to achieve peace throughout the nations, but collaboration is. In his speech Einstein used multiple persuasive techniques to support his argument, such as logos, pathos, and rhetorical questions.
Because of his “philosophical laziness,” his diction becomes professional, and he is able to think in a way that would not have occurred if he were not lazy. Through the use of diction, Morley successfully establishes that laziness is a trait that should be considered and praised upon rather than a trait that is frowned
One one hand he was curious, but he knew it was a terrible thing, he said “The war was a hideous thing, but there was something tremendous about it, too. I couldn't afford to miss it. You have to see human beings in this unchained condition in order to know something about them” (Hughes and Blom, 110).
Thomas Jefferson once wrote, "Determine never to be idle . . . It is wonderful how much may be done if we are always doing." Jefferson's statement is important because life is short and we should not waste a second of it sitting still. There is always something to do to improve ourselves, our lives, and the lives of others. Sitting still and doing nothing serves little to no purpose.
Being lazy is a quality that I am trying, and willing to anything to conquer. I am a very humorous and loyal person. I feel loyal and humorous people bring positive energy to society, while laziness plagues humans in a negative aspect. Respect and loyalty are two behaviors that I heavily practice, which the chimpanzee society is based on. Seeking for trust, the human society lacks loyal people.