On December 17, 2014, Plaintiff Howard Rote Jr., an inmate housed at the Western
Correction Institution brought suit arising from various incidents during his incarceration at various institution within the Department of Public and Correctional Services. ECF Document 1. Mr. Rote’s complaint alleged a myriad of allegations but listed no time frames or dates for any of the allegations. In an effort to gain clarity regarding Mr. Rote’s complaint, undersigned counsel (herein after “State Defendant’s Counsel”) filed a Motion for More Definite Statement. ECF Document 10. The motion contained what was believed to be a compilation of Mr. Rotes claims and requested that Plaintiff provide “provide a date or, at the least, a month and year in which each
…show more content…
The confiscation of hearing aids and denial of access to TTY equipment on multiple occasions.
b. Two alleged assaults:
i. On Christmas Eve, Officer Brickman allegedly pushed Rote out of a door and caused his wheelchair to flip into ice and snow injuring him; and ii. Case managers Bennett and Yates allegedly called Rote behind door 6 and “jumped him.”
b. Harassment and retaliation by mental health and medical staff and by Correctional Officers Scarppi, Davis, R.C. King and Sergeant Femi, who were correctional officers assigned to work in the medical department.
c. The search of Rote’s cell #2B3 in Building 2. For this claim, Rote is also directed to identify the search of his cell.
d. The failure by unidentified correctional staff to respond Rote’s complaints of head pain. For this claim, Rote is also directed to identify the staff member he alleges was involved in this incident, and why he believes the staff member acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs.
ECF Document 17, at pp. 1-2. Mr. Rote was cautioned that “Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of all or part of his claims.” Id. at p. 2, ¶2.
II. Factual Background.
To date, Mr. Rote has failed to satisfactorily comply with the Court’s
CCIB Intake received referral #0651-1009-4066-0071107 dated 10/30/16. The reporting party (RP) was Oneil Malcolm, Facility Manager. The RP stated on 10/30/16 while supervising minors Devante Pinson and Jacob Sigala, Devanet was observed taking Jacob 's phone charger and walk towards his room. Jacob was observed stepping in front of Devanet asking repeatedly for him to return his charger. As Devante walked away he moved Jacob out of his way using his left hand.
In your grievance filed at CACF, you claim the mattress you were issued is defective. You further claim inmates at CACF are not receiving the same type of mattresses as other ADC inmates. Your resolution is to receive a new mattress. Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Bureau Administrator 's response is affirmed.
Notice of Appeal for Slye Karguy’s case: (Sources – Sample Notice of Appeal & Statsky, pg. 298 & Week 3, Appellate Brief Assignment) United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia State of Georgia, Plaintiff, v. File Number 00-0001 Slye Karguy, Defendant, NOTICE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby given that the State of Georgia, Plaintiff, in the above named case hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th
INTRODUCTION: This case involved Giselle Hernandez being a danger to herself. Hernandez was transported to the Exodus Urgent Care Center, where she was placed on a WIC 5150 hold. INVESTIGATION: On 09-07-17 at approximately 1542 hours, LA County Clinician Vasquez #433353
In determining whether a genuine issue of the material fact whether a genuine issue of material fact occurs regarding the reasonableness of the requested accommodation, we first examine whether Turners facial presenting that her proposed accommodation is possible. If appellant has made out a prima facie showing, the load then shifts to prove a favorable defense, that the accommodations requested by Turner are unreasonable or would cause an undue hardship on the employer. In contrast, If Turner has satisfied her initial burden, Turners proposed accommodation seems practical. At this time, Hershey rotations policy is new one which had never been required of employees in Turners position. If Turner 's proposed accommodation would permit the new rotation program to endure, even though on a modified basis.
An Enforcer inquiry was conducted to determine if any members of the 110 Detective Squad ran the name "Shawn Thomas" from 2100 hours on 06/08/2015 - 2100 hours on 06/09/2015. The Enforcer Check revealed that two (2) members of the 110 Squad ran the name "Shawn Thomas", Det. Kelly and Det. Patel (formerly assigned to the 110th Squad). These two officers were subsequently added to this case as subjects with the allegation of DRV-Other for failure to take appropriate actio n in regards to an active I-Card.
Motion Standard Under FRCP 56, summary judgment must be granted if the movant, through the pleadings, the discovery, and disclosure materials on file, shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. FRCP 56(c) mandates the
The topic this past week that will be most beneficial to my ministry is the session with Commissioner Fred Ruth. Commissioner Ruth’s officership was more than a wonderful story; it was account of life that put pride aside, was completely available, and of someone who was fully obedient to his calling. There were many points made by Commissioner Ruth that I will consider for my ministry as an officer. The first point made was that “one would never know the impact that we can make, if we make ourselves available.”
1. Facts: Explain the essential facts of the case. Tell the story of the case. Jacob Winkleman is a 6-year-old student at Pleasant Valley Elementary School in Parma, Ohio. Jacob was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and is covered under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Act or IDEA), 84 Stat. 175, as amended, 20 U. S. C. §1400 et seq.
The case I will be concentrating on is Tomcik vs. Ohio Dep’t of Rehabilitation and Correction in which Tomcik was imprisoned under the custody of Department of Rehabilitation and correction, based on the Legal and Ethical Issues for Health Professionals book. The problem stimulated from continuous negligence from nurses and doctors at the department, which initially was when Tomcik received a physical evaluation, included the breast examination by Dr. Evans who stated that the examination was cursory and lasted only a few seconds, which means that not much attention was presented regarding the patient and his job. The next day Tomcik noticed a lump as being about the size of a pea in her right breast, however it was not reported by Dr. Evans.
Additionally, in an attempt to foster an increase in professionalism within the correctional community, care and consideration must be taken with the care and housing of inmates both privately operated and those operated by some branch of the government. “The quality of prisons has improved from the past, but there continue to be too many inhumane new prisons. New construction does not always result in a prison conductive to humane incarceration” (Bartollas,
George Anthony The witness list includes Vasco Degama Thompson, an ex-convict who served time for kidnapping, ABC affiliate WFTV reported. The defense alleges that Thompson had phone conversations with George Anthony on July 14, just days before Caylee was reported missing, Cindy Anthony was the one who reported Caylee missing, in July 2008 Lee Anthony testified about his sister's pregnancy with Caylee, breaking down in tears as he claimed his family ignored her pregnancy, not talking about it until just days before she gave birth in 2005. Tony Lazzaro was seen with Casey the day after she was reported missing Roy Kronk found Caylee Anthony’s remains in a wooded area near the Anthony family home, he saw a white object in the same location
For the reason that plaintiff could not carry out her essential function needed as a shaker table inspector job, the District Court articulate that appellant was not a qualified individual as per the ADA. In addition, the district court the reliable that appellant could not sustain a claim for reasonable accommodation, for the reason that any exclusion from the rotation system would make a danger of increasing the injuries for the pretender and the other table inspectors and therefore, would be arbitrary. In other words, was the case so that no reasonable jury could find that the employee was eligible for reasonable essential accommodation claim under
Davis specifies that the lack of accountability for inappropriate behavior is caused by faulty administrative action as she explains, “Grievance or investigatory procedures, where they exist, are often ineffectual...” (78). Since women’s prisons were established, sexual abuse has been used as a form of punishment, although this is not formally acknowledged by prison officials, it is undeniable that women’s prison staff more than oftentimes engage in sexual
The applicant, the mother of the infants, had been divorced by the respondent, the father of the infants. At the time of the divorce, the Kathi had recorded a consent order giving the custody of the infants to the respondent. Since the divorce the applicant had remarried a man not related to the infants. It was contended by the respondent inter alia (a) that the applicant was precluded from making the application as she had consented to the order for custody made by the Kathi; (b) that the Guardianship of Infants Act, 1961 was inapplicable as the infants were