The artistic choices made in the production of cinema have a great impact on the way the audience will perceive certain aspects of the performance. One director may choose to highlight a certain scene, while another director may push it aside as trivial. A majority of the symbolism behind theatre lends itself to open interpretation, but some underlying messages have a widely accepted truth. In Nicholas Hytner’s 1996 interpretation of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, lighting and camera angles help accentuate the importance of particular moments throughout the film. I chose to analyze the courthouse scene in which Deputy Danforth asks Elizabeth whether or not John Proctor committed the crime of adultery.
When you change a book to a movie, you lose some good things, but you gain others. In "The Giver" the movie, there are many changes and lost scenes, but there is also wonderful additions that you can see and hear now, such as music and the character 's expressions. While the movie is not a facsimile of the book, it’s still really good. Many things such as color, landscape, sounds, music, character’s expressions, and more played a huge role in the novel and the movie, but they played different parts in each. Music and the character 's expressions were things that made the movie better, by putting focus on the mood of the story and showing important things the community is missing.
The method is to make the structure of the essay similar to the structure of filmmaking and pay attention to many elements and symbols that influenced the viewers, consciously or unconsciously. The concentration is on comparing and finding the changes that history made to this movie genre, especially considering the gender roles. Results will clearly explain the psyche of society in two different periods, which confirms that people reflect the movies as movies have an impact on people. The Introduction It is often said that the element of surprise makes the movie more interesting and leads the plot. There are many masters of storytelling
Leonardo DiCaprio, who plays the role of Gatsby, acts out the mysterious aura that surrounds Gatsby. Daisy was also described as beautiful and charming, which is what Luhrmann did in the first scene with Daisy. Some say that the movie was not an accurate representation of the book because of added scenes and modern music, however this does not take away from the representation, instead they add to the story to help bring out the emotion in the scenes. The added scenes help elaborate on scenes that the audience might not completely comprehend. The modern music is a unique addition into the movie which takes place in the 1920s.the modern music helps to not only explain a scene, but help the modern age feel more into the movie.
Many people wonder why us teens enjoy dystopian movies and literature. Our reasons why we enjoy these kind of films and books are because it interest us, it makes us to think outside the box, it shows us a different lifestyle to live. For examples like the book “Anthem” by Ayn Rand and the movie “The Giver” by Philip Noyce. The movie and film both have a dystopian setting. For their dystopian ideas they both made them having some kind of rebel, who believes in more than just black and white or normal.
This film had an effect on myself since I have been included and have an view of how individuals talk and act with each other and when they are with certain individuals. In this motion picture it was portrayed precisely the way the real things happened I trust it would have same measure of intrigue yet not a similar measure of
Surrealism: How It Impacted the Future of Digital Visual Effects Dawson Carpenter 20th-century Art Professor Field March 10, 2018 For decades, cinema has continued to portray an impactful role on the world for it allows people to express themselves as well as question what they see as reality. Cinema is powerful for it can be categorized in a myriad of genres and that many people can happen to find enjoyment in, for it should be well-aware that not everyone has the same interest towards a particular genre, compared to one person’s thoughts. Despite its various meanings and, cinema has always been an experience for people are given the ability to project their consciousness into a ultimately limitless world in
The music creates intensity in the scene and makes it more powerful and dramatic. The music makes us wonder what may happen to Alice and what will she encounter at the bottom of the hole if she manages to make it out alive. The entire scene is full of fear and tension which is what Burton expects the audience to feel, but in actuality there is nothing to fear, Alice makes it out alive and fulfills her destiny. Although sound plays a big part in a movie, lighting is also very important for a movie to
Introduction to 20th century music Although the music we make today is (generally) very different from the music composed and listened to in the 20th century we can still appreciate the style and sound of this era. This era and its composers rebelled against the previously accepted practices of music, which is what makes this era both interesting and intriguing. Another factor which is somewhat intriguing about this era of music is the dates involved. As the name suggests 20th century music is classified as music which was composed in the years 1901 till 2000. However within these years there were different ‘’influences’’ which overlap into the 20th century of music.
Not just a temporal re-ordering of a film, but rather films of a more avant-garde style that cannot be interpreted by previous experience. In a general sense, avant-garde cinema will break conventions and as such it could be explained as their use of unique semiotics, often being what differentiates the films that fall under that category. The conventional production techniques are still used within the Avant-garde, but the stark differences to what normative spectators expect is where we find this kind of disconnect. Usually this comes from the vision of the director, but the issue here is that if it truly is Avant-garde, a spectator can then only truly learn the codified semiotics per director and thus has to re-learn a style with each different director to comprehend the film. Hence a semiotic explanation to this could be argued to be too simplistic, it is not merely acquiring the new code-based schemata, because truly avant-garde films will not have the same codification.