527 participants were invited to take part in our study. The group of participants was a mixture of male and female adults. All of them were happy to take part in the experiment and were recompensed by some partners of ours at the end of the project. From the beginning on, we had a clear and well structured expectation of the outcome of the sexual scandal experiment. Not only us but many others too can imagine that most people would treat a sexual scandal with the case of a female politician involved differently from a case with a male politician involved. This is actually due to a theory called “Sexual Double Standards Theory” which says that a man involved in a sexual affairs gets more accepted within a society than a woman. Oliver, Shilby …show more content…
The bias in this case is the “Internalised Sexism Theory” which says that women internalise the social expectation that they should not behave in sexually permissive ways and will therefore seek to promote this value in their everyday lives, far more than men do. This would have the result, that they would be less tolerating sexual scandals, what would oppose those former mentioned ideals. When we have a look at both, the Sexual Standards Double and the Internalised Sexism Theory, we can see that both theories together explain why both men and women will judge the sexual scandal of a female politician more harshly than the other one. In-group bias, is one of the moderators which could have an impact of the study. The resulting hypothesis is that women will be judged by male and female survey takers more harshly. This could maybe have the effect of causing women to be more tolerant towards each other and thus make them to judge female politicians involved in scandals less harshly. The hypothesis just mentioned is based on Taifel´s Minimal Group paradigm in which it is said that group affiliation might be a basic custom in human behaviour. The result of it is the group favouritism effect. However, this could be moderated by the System justification Theory, which says that in-group bias is weaker among low status groups, as they rationalise their low status and then discriminate against their own group. This would treat as equal to women who internalise the stereotypes towards themselves and how they should react to sexual affairs and eventually acting upon them. This would have the effect that in-group bias would have not much influence on the results of the study and how female participants react to sexual affairs because it will be balanced out by the System
John Demos created a graph that showed that between 75 and 82 percent of the accused were women, mostly in the ages of 41 to 60(Doc B). This shows there were sexism because there were more women than men being accused. A lot of the accusers were women,
The films The Nine Lives of Marion Barry and Anita, contribute to history in allowing us to go back in the past to see how we as a society chose how to handle scandals, which creates certain expectation and set boundaries during the era in which they occurred. With this information, we can then redefine the differences between events in the past and compare them today. For example, Barry was elected into office countless times after countless drug scandals surfaced about his coke addition, yet Anita Hill’s reputation was destroyed after she accused Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. Many would consider this to be great injustice, resulting in confusion. As a result, the media plays such an important role in helping us understand and in showing how some scandals are very specific to time, place, and culture which is why people react differently to them.
Annotated Bibliography Berlatsky, Noah. “When Men Experience Sexism.” The Atlantic. 29 May 2013. Web.
It can impact social factors, group cohesion and self-leadership skills. In Penny Wong’s case, society 's gender expectations may discourage her from a political career because she is female. This is due to the profession being strongly dominated by males. Members in society may also discriminate Penny, for being female and for her sexuality as a Lesbian.
Prejudice is good Millions. Millions have been slaughtered ruthlessly and mercilessly in the name of a false morality created by prejudice. Prejudice is the cause of the 6,000,000 dead jewish people in the holocaust due to Adolf Hitler. Prejudice is the cause of the deaths of innocent black men by police. These millions of people can only begin to describe the true suffering due to prejudice.
In the article titled “Perfect Victim Stereotypes” Luisa de Vogel states, “About 60 percent of reported sexual
The novellas Of Mice and Men and The Pearl are both often noted as social criticisms. The author, John Steinbeck addresses real-life issues that society is facing. Whether through direct statements and comments, or through a fictional characters’ situation, Steinbeck criticizes just some of the problems of society. He shows the way people are discriminated against, and why. He shows the issues society faces.
All individuals are surrounded by a massive environment which eventually begins to influence all parts of one’s life. In a broad context, everyone is influenced by each other; creating an interest beneficiary relationship. However, in a general context, the environment imposes a much bigger influence on both parties; affecting one’s perspective and opinion. This big general context becomes one of the reasons people shape their thoughts and behaviors around their specific environment. In the essay “Selections from Hard to Get: Twenty-Something Women and the Paradox of Sexual Freedom,” Leslie Bell discusses how women could have “splitting” when they gain the contradictory directives from a pre selected society.
A deeply rooted prejudice against people who got involved in sexual crime cases, especially victims, has existed for a long time, which may traumatise victims traumatic and cause them to be reluctant to report the incident to the police (Ward, 1995). Sometimes the situation will be made worse by media
Scandals, which inevitably have negative impacts on people, sometimes work to the benefits of many others instead. Despite of their potential destruction, I agree partly with the claim that scandals are useful at times for they focus our attention on some problems, but we shall not ignore the consequences they may result at the same time. In modern society, the popularization of mass media such as newspapers and Internet makes spreading various aspects of information much easier than ever before. Although the television and mainstream broadcast dominate the major field, still, the tabloids which include some anecdotes begin to catch more attention.
These effects include competing with other women, demeaning and discrediting themselves, and the further objectification of women within society. The implications of internalized misogyny in the 21st century are varied and can be harmful to society without being confronted because of how they contribute to present oppressive structures. As a result, the current wave of feminism has spread more awareness about these behaviors and how to deal with them (Ferguson) including building solidarity amongst women (David
Yet, women and men hardly differ in terms of their experiences on the job. As a matter of fact, Catalyst (2004) showed that there is hardly a difference between senior men and women when aspiring for the highest roles in an organization. Ely, Ibarra, and Kolb (2011) affirmed that women struggle with so-called second generation gender biases, which are “powerful yet often invisible barriers to women’s advancement that arise from cultural beliefs about gender, as well as workplace structures, practices, and patterns of interactions that inadvertently favour
Politicians’ role is leading the country on the behalf of for the people. That the public has an interest in their private life is thought as a natural thing compared to a celebrity. But because politicians are also people and citizens of a country, so they have human rights and dignity. One of the examples of the violations of politicians’ privacy is that the media reported ‘a extramarital intercourse’ of Mitterrand (Dr. Son 4), the late French President. In a society which sees ‘a extramarital intercourse’ as a negative gaze, that the president of a country acted such an action could be a problem.
Theoretical Framework Media of all kinds proliferate gender depictions; a number of theoretical frameworks can be employed in analyzing such mediated representations and their effects. The two main theories that will be used in this evaluative content analysis are social cognitive theory and gender schema theory. Social Cognitive Theory (AKA Social Learning Theory) Social cognitive theory provides a framework that can be applied to understanding how exposure to mediated interactions - through video games, for example - can convey gender lessons to gamers, influencing their beliefs about gender roles and their own gender-related self-construction. From the perspective of this theoretic framework, media content serves as a source of “gender-linked
Introduction and Problem Statement: The reality of the matter is that no occupation or calling is protected from sexual harassment. Sexual harassment keeps on being a pervasive issue in workplaces. The recurrence demonstrates the reality of the issue furthermore the dire need to dispose of it. Distinctive studies have demonstrated that women are more inclined to sexual harassment.