The impact of Jawaharlal Nehru’s social policies on Indian society
To what extent did Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru’s social policies with regard to women and religious groups impact Indian society?
Name: Naintara Maira
IB Candidate Number: 000220-0024
Advisors Name: Mrs. Vera Garg
Extended Essay in History Word Count: 3711
American Embassy School
New Delhi, India
Abstract This research consists of to what extent did Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru’s social policies with regard to women and religious groups impacted Indian society? Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minster, the father of modern India. This paper will outline the conditions and important events impacting the women and religious groups prior
…show more content…
“In his presidential address to the Lahore Congress in 1929, Nehru admitted that although he was born a Hindu, he does not know how far he is justified in calling himself one, or speaking on behalf of the Hindus” (Nanda). Although Nehru did not refer to himself as part of one specific religious group he did support others of all religious groups. In 1954, “Nehru had written in his last will and testament: “I do not want any religious ceremonies performed for me after my death. I do not believe in any such ceremonies … My desire to have a handful of my ashes thrown into the Ganga at Allahabad has no religious significance, so far as I am concerned… I have been attracted to the Ganga and Yamuna Rivers in Allahabad ever since my childhood” (Wolpert).
Nehru believed in having what most would refer to as a religious connection to the rivers at Allahabad. He did not believe this to be a religious belief or connection. His belief of religion also impacted Indian society. “Nehru’s view became vital in judging his government’s policies” (Spear). “No Brahmin can receive election today without low caste votes. Caste groupings are in many areas being exploited as ready-made political machines with the result that the massive electorate of mainly illiterate voters has been showing unexpected life” (Spear). This is saying that it was Nehru that championed this. Some could say he helped and others say he did the opposite.
…show more content…
It is said on the Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi website, “A University stands for humanism. For tolerance, for reason, for the adventure of ideas and for the search of truth. It stands for the onward march of the human race towards even higher objectives. If the Universities discharge their duties adequately, then it is well with the Nation and the People.” These are all the qualities in Nehru that brought him to enforce social policies that were beneficial to all citizens of India. His legacy is carried on till today. “Jawaharlal Nehru can be justifiably considered an architect of modern India. One of the great Indians of the twentieth century, he has been variously described as a democrat, socialist, humanist and visionary, but he was all these and more. Any assessment of his role in the making of independent India would need to take cognisance of his immense stature and extraordinary personality and would, therefore, inevitable be complex and somewhat controversial”
America gained its independence in 1776 with the expectation that every American should have liberty and equality. However, American women did not have the right to vote until 1920, which was almost more than 140 years after the United States was established. Women could do little to protect themselves and promote their careers due to being treated unequally and inferior to men. During the 19th and the early 20th century, women were working hard and fighting for gender equality, so that more and more women could live a better life with basic civil rights in their hometowns. In reality, women’s equality was challenged by traditional conventions in the fields of biological difference in sexes, religion and gender roles, and different perspectives towards these conventions of different people made women’s civil rights controversial.
Once the BEIC had control over India, they reshaped the government to better suit their needs. For instance, the BEIC required that natives couldn’t serve in “civil administration till they become Christian,” seeing that “no civil or military servant in India rises to a position of real influence or distinction.” (Document 15) Before the BEIC, India’s government was self-sufficient and flourishing. Laws were passed in response to problems that people were encountering, with the well-being of the people as the key objective. The BEIC was not taking into account the natives.
There are many people in the world that have made a difference. Every person alive, that has been alive, and will be born, will have an effect on the world in one way or another. Two people that have affected the world are Mahatma Gandhi, an Indian antiwar activist, and Chris McCandless, from the true novel Into the Wild. These two may have affected the world differently, but when their actions and stories are put together, a whole is created.
Through the quote stated it shows us as the readers that they cried for a democratic system! One of the underlying details of a democratic system is that everyone has equal protection under the law. Under the current circumstances the Indians could get away with any actions without having to suffer consequences. The citizens in the council shouldn’t have been allowed to sway their loyalty to where they saw fit. They supported in what was in their best interest and profit.
During the 1940’s and 1950’s, there were quite a few social policy changes that emerged in the United Kingdom because of World War II. Once the German’s started bombing city areas in England, especially during the London Blitz, air raids became a normal occurrence. As soon as the bomb siren was heard, every man, woman, and child no matter what social class or economic status, would find a bomb shelter. A lot of people had not seen, how difference social classes lived until there were all performing the same action. They were hit with the direct interaction with other class citizens and forced to notice the differences.
Thank you, Aunt Bessie for entrusting me with this enormous task. You have shown me the underside of America that I did not know existed. It has made me appreciate all of the social reforms that took place during the Progressive Era to make life better for all Americans. You have helped me learn about the Progressive reformers like Jane Addams, John Muir, Lewis Hine, Upton Sinclair, Teddy Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Woodrow Wilson, and many more dedicated citizens like yourself. You have given child labor, food safety, and deforestation a great gift of
Gandhi convinced the Indians that he could get them their independence. They would get their independence long as they didn't cooperate. Gandhi used a couple of lines from the Declaration of Independence that in other words meant, “if a law is unjust, then it is not a law.” Gandhi also told his people that in order to pretext they had to be willing to get jail time. Gandhi's methods worked because both his people and him were uncooperative.
The Marāthās, in particular, became so enraged that they eventually gained their independence from the Mughals and established their own empire,” (Gale). The departure of the Marāthās proves the lack of religious tolerance the Mughals had at times. The Marāthās were so enraged at the lack of acceptance that they left the empire rendering it smaller and weaker. This is just one example of the Mughals not only only neglecting to practice religious tolerance, but how refusing to accept all people for their beliefs backfired in the empire’s overall growth and unity.
Muslims still felt less important than the Hindus fearing Muslim interests wouldn’t be protected by the mainly Hindu congress. In conclusion for Dr. Lalvani to say that the British over all helped and positively impacted India completely disregards the fact that Indians had to go through so much loss and pain through struggles and challenges that India has to go through
Queen Elizabeth I once said, “I have the heart of a man, not a woman, and I am not afraid of anything”. She was the Queen of England and Ireland from November 1558 up to her death on March 1603. She was the last monarch of the House of Tudor with the Elizabethan Period, which is often called the Golden Age of English History. In 1988, historian John Guy once said, "England was economically healthier, more expansive, and more optimistic under the Tudors" than at any time in a thousand years. I decided to choose this Period because in my opinion, this period had contributed a lot to the modern day England especially in terms of culture, literature and anything associated with that.
Civil disobedience is the active refusal to obey certain laws and demands of a government. People argue that going against the government is not right and that it is breaking the law. Although in some cases it may not be right, it does not mean it is breaking the law. The Declaration of Independence states, “... whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends,” meaning Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness then, “it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…” (Bill of Rights Institute).
(ARTTICLESSSS) As stated previously, religion was an issue in the Mughal Empire. It was a Hindu population ruled by Muslims- eventually, a new religion was created called Sikhism, which was a cross between Hinduism and Islam, but this did not soothe the religious unrest. There were actually a few cases of Hindu rebellions.
Antagonism can be defined as active hostility or opposition. India has a long tradition of religious tension. One of the most significant sustained religious conflicts has been between the Hindus and Muslims. This essay will focus on the causes of the Hindu-Muslim antagonism, and will at same time assess the quote of Sir S.A Khan. 1.
Introduction In India, discriminatory attitude towards men and women have existed for generations and thus it affect the lives of both genders. Although the constitution of India has granted men and women equal rights, but gender gap still remains. Female discrimination violates human rights. These are mostly seen in family land sharing among sisters and brothers.
The westernisation effected many factors of Indian society including lifestyle, dressing, communication, religions, education, dressing , food and various habits. It is quite evident fact that India as a country has changed a lot after the colonisation era, some were beneficial changes like transportation which included trains, bringing an international language to the country. but in most of the cases the effects had a devastating effect on the countries economy, the country considered a golden bird before has turned out to an under developed nation at the end of colonisation. This paper of our aims at bringing in on how the colonisation has effected Indian society, by studying a few important factors effected.[1] INRODUCTION: India a land of multiple diversities has a great and ancient culture. It’s one of the oldest and richest cultures which is now under serious threat as western culture is laying strong foundation in india and slowly wiping out indian culture.