ipl-logo

Joseph Stalin Research Paper

725 Words3 Pages

Stalin: An Economic Savior “We are fifty to a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make up this gap in ten years. Either we do this or they crush us” (Joseph Stalin). When Stalin first became the leader of Russia in 1929, the economy was in shambles. The economic regime in place was heavily based on agriculture, and the production of goods and military equipment as well as industry was almost non-existent. Stalin realized that this agrarian society would never be able to compete or be feared by other countries, and thus he decided to upheave the Soviet Union’s former rural society, transforming it into a modernized economy. Therefore, Stalin was overall an effective leader because of his contributions to the Russian economy …show more content…

Stalin believed that by creating a heavy emphasis on production as well as launching massive propaganda, that overall industry would be able to increase and circulate money into the economy. And as a result of his first five-year plan, which ended in 1934, Russia experienced a “fifty percent increase in industrial output” as well as an “average annual growth rate of eighteen percent” . Furthermore, what is truly remarkable about these results is that Stalin was able to increase revenue in a time of economic instability. During this period of growth in Russia, other countries, such as the United States, were facing economic stagnation and struggling to support their own citizens. Therefore, the mere fact that Stalin was able to facilitate economic growth and aid to the development of his nation during a global economic downturn, demonstrates his efficacy as a …show more content…

Firstly, in order to move Russia into a fully communist state, as believed by Marx, it needed to have a completely industrialized economy . Therefore, Stalin’s changes to the Russian economy were not only for aiding in the modernization of the country, but as well incorporated communist beliefs. In addition, by eliminating private business and moving ownership to the government, standard prices were created, which made goods more accessible to the public. And lastly, by creating a focus on industrialization, many peasants were able to rise in social class by becoming members of the working caste. In fact, employment in Russia from 1928 to 1932 more than doubled, increasing from 11.5 million to 24 million . Thus, Stalin was an effective leader because he was able to promote communism as well as increase the number of individuals in the working

Show More
Related

  • Soviet Union Dbq

    296 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to him, the Union has to keep their pace, or they would be defeated. (Document 1) This was a positive part of Stalin's rule. This made the people proud of their country and made them want to come together and grow stronger. Stalin provided the

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Dbq Essay

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    Following the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1914, Joseph Stalin took up his position as leader of the Soviet Union. After rising to power, Stalin made drastic changes to Russia that was still torn from war at the time. With his power, Stalin aimed to bring Russia to the top of the world. In the end, while he pushed the Soviet Union’s economy to new heights, his methods were cruel and had negative impacts. After the war, Stalin was determined to turn Russia into a great industrial power.

    Read More

  • How Did Stalin Lead To The Russian Revolution

    774 Words  | 4 Pages

    From 1928, when the plan started, to 1932 to its end, many factories, dams, power stations and even cities were being built. Despite there being harsh penalties implemented to workers for failure to meet their targets, there was still a significant increase in Russia’s industrial growth in a very short period of time. Just like the emancipation of the serfs in 1861, under Tsar Alexander II, in protest of Stalin’s policies, the peasants, in protest, refused to work harder than they needed too, causing them to destroy livestock and crops, which eventually lead to their unnecessary death. Stalin, just like the Tsarist autocratic regime, was not committed to collectivism but preferred capitalism in his ruling of the Soviet Union. This caused a lot of rebellion from the Kulaks who opposed collectivism.

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to Doc. 4, the USSR produced 35.4 million tons of coal, 11.7 million tons of oil, 3.3 million tons of iron, and 4 million tons of steel in 1927. With Stalin in office, these numbers increased greatly in 1932. According to the Background Doc., “Stalin implemented collectivization which combined all of the agricultural farms into large state-owned farms and forced the peasants to work on them,

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Dbq

    408 Words  | 2 Pages

    Joseph Stalin became dictator of the Soviet Union in 1928 (“Joseph Stalin – Powerful Communist Ruler”) after the death of Russia’s former ruler Vladimir Lenin (“Joseph Stalin”). In the late 1920’s he created a sequence of five year plans which were created to alter the Soviet Union from a peasant society into a country that was industrially advanced (“Joseph Stalin.”) after he realised Russia was far behind in comparison to the west (“Joseph Stalin.”). The idea was for the government to control the economy in which they forced collectivization of Soviet agriculture, the idea in which the government controlled farming.

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Dbq Essay

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stalin didn’t just use the secret police to crush the hopes and dreams of his people. He also banned religion. This was done because he believed in science and he didn’t want people to focus on life without communism. (Document Four) Stalin’s political actions can be seen as completely tyrannical but he did impact society as

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Dbq

    1223 Words  | 5 Pages

    Stalin obtained a significant focus on heavy industry, for he knew it would only bring benefits to those who follow him; however, his viewpoint of what could be accomplished opposed to what people in the USSR believed can be achievable. The first plan adopted by the party in 1928 “set goals that were unrealtic- a 250 percent increase in overall industrial development and a 330 percent expansion in heavy industry alone” (Document 1). People believed that the USSR was still in its developing stage; therefore, a demand in increasing industrial production by a large amount will not happen in a short period of time. Problems began to evolve due to the unrealistic demands Stalin put into place. Managers and company owners believed that the quote they had to achieve was unreasonable leading to conflict.

    Read More

  • Russia And Japan Industrialization Analysis

    796 Words  | 4 Pages

    This was similar to the United States of America, as the US was also trying to industrialize with a purpose of factories and people working in them. A big factor of the industrialization that both America and Russia shared was that both of these countries had a very unfair system for workers. The pay was not great, and people who were poor had it even worse. There is even an old saying that fits this very well, “The rich get richer”. This is true because the people who were already poor, who were working for the money so they could afford things like homes, food, water, and clothing, were staying poor, because their pay was so low that at the rate of them using their money for necessities, they were earning barely enough to afford them.

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Dbq

    619 Words  | 3 Pages

    Post WWl, Russia was still not industrialized, suffering economically and politically and in no doubt in need of a leader after Lenin’s death. “His successor, Joseph Stalin, a ruthless dictator, seized power and turned Russia into a totalitarian state where the government controls all aspects of private and public life.” Stalin showed these traits by using methods of enforcement, state control of individuals and state control of society. The journey of Stalin begins now.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx: The Contributions Of Vladimir Lenin And Marxism

    1543 Words  | 7 Pages

    However, the question of whether he was a hero who toppled an oppressive tyranny, or a villain who replaced it with another remains a controversial one today. In 1917, Lenin helped overthrow the Russian tsar Nicholas II, and founded the Soviet Union. On October 1917, after the victory of the Russian Revolution, Lenin did not have a clear image on socialism, or how it meant to be built. He was, however, able to state the three principal characteristics of socialism, which were the public ownership of the means of production, an end to exploitation, and the dictatorship of the proletariat. He did not take action on these points, and did not devote much attention to socialism as he felt it was not yet an immediate issue.

    Read More

  • Stalin And Hitler: Similarities And Differences

    814 Words  | 4 Pages

    Stalin and Hitler: Similarities and Differences Stalin and Hitler emerged at the time when political and economic instability had crippled the USSR and Germany. They began making improvements which encouraged their people to believe that prosperous times await them. This notion would unfortunately turn out as an illusion. Both figures would eventually rule by decree. Despite treading on different paths of ruling, both figures still find some commonalities.

    Read More

  • Soviet Union Dbq

    480 Words  | 2 Pages

    The USSR’s GNP (Gross National Product) was significantly lower than the United States, but the USSR still spent over thirty billion more dollars on their military program. The Soviet Union had more of everything, besides money. The military was known as the “Red Army,” and they had more troops, tanks, artillery guns, and nuclear weapons than any other nation on the planet. In Document E, Time Magazine compares the USSR’s Nuclear Arsenal to that of the United States, and its more than double the size. The USSR went to extreme lengths to have the most powerful army in the world, yet it greatly damaged their economy years before it collapsed.

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin: The End Justifies The Means

    990 Words  | 4 Pages

    Under the breadths of communism, Stalin reorganized the economy and changed labor prioritization. Executing a total of 3 individual 5-year plan installments, Stalin began to change the long ancient farmland based economy into an industrial superpower. These centralized economic plans were instated by a state planning committee that followed communistic economic principles. In this manner, the 5-year plans called for rapid industrialization through heavy industry. Joshua R. Keefe wrote for the Student Pulse: “ . . .

    Read More

  • Weaknesses Of Joseph Stalin

    1319 Words  | 6 Pages

    Fordham University entailed, "if there were a proletarian dictatorship not only in our country but in other, more advanced countries as well, Germany and France, say. If that were the case, the capitalist encirclement could not be so serious a danger as it is now, " With these three quotes excerpted thus far, it is clear to see that Stalin played the victim card, making the Soviet Union seemed completely doomed. To fix this awful problem, the answer lied in the rapid industrialization he desperately wanted and eventually achieved (Fordham University). Stalin also explained on the Soviet Unions issues internally. Fordham University stated, "But besides the external conditions, there are also internal conditions which dictate a fast rate of development of our industry as the main foundation of our entire national economy.

    Read More

  • Positive Benefits Of War Communism

    1012 Words  | 5 Pages

    War communism had a devastating impact on the peasants and proletariat in Russian society between 1918 and 1928. However, the New Economic Policy that followed the Civil War effects was opposite, raising living standards and reinstating support for the Bolshevik party. Vladimir “Lenin” Ulyanov, known as the head of the notorious Bolshevik party, introduced War Communism (1918-1921) and the NEP (1921-1928). As Martin McCauley states “If War Communism was a leap into socialism then the New Economic Policy was a leap out of socialism” The aims of War Communism and the NEP were both successful in a large number of areas, however, the effects of both policies were not all favourable.

    Read More

More about Joseph Stalin Research Paper

Open Document