To enhance the system of health care, a just culture needs implemented. A just culture encourages an environment that pinpoints problems for improvement, rather than just seeking blame. Furthermore, an overview of the risk management process and its five components will illuminate the importance of identifying, analyzing, prioritizing, and monitoring risks. The risk management process combined with a just culture will promote best practices for an improved health care system with reduced or eliminated errors. Just Culture Risk managers that support a just culture, realize that people make mistakes and punishments seldom resolve problems. While most health care workers do strive to achieve their best, even the best doctors inadvertently make …show more content…
Potential risks can come in all shapes and sizes and if left undetected, risks can develop into hazardous consequences. “Risk identification is the process whereby the risk management professional becomes aware of risks in the health care environment that constitute potential loss exposures for the institution” (Carroll, 2009, 15). Risk managers seek to gather information to warn about potential risks through an array of sources, such as generic occurrence screenings (patient records, incident reports, etc.), patient surveys, incident reports and claims, state licensure surveys, the organization’s infection control and performance improvement units, The Joint Commission and other similar group surveys (the National Committee of Quality Assurance Surveys, liability insurers, risk management consultants), contracts, and last but not least informal discussions with managers and staff. Spotting risks before they happen is key (Carroll, 2009, …show more content…
The risk manager must forecast and calculate the appropriate combination of risk control and risk financing. Considerations must explore issues such as the amounts of patient care liability risks through insurance deductibles or self-insured retention, limits to how much risk there can be for certain services, in-service education, appropriate staffing, credentialing, and purchases of insurance. Step Four: Implementing the Selected Techniques Implementing the selected techniques is a combined effort between risk management and other organizational management. Risk management sets the limits to policies, and selects insurers and deductibles. After receiving direction from risk management, the other managers apply the new techniques to their individual departments and staff. Step Five: Monitoring and Improving The final step of the risk management process is to monitor and improve the program. However, risk managers are not alone on this task as upper management, the health care staff, the governing board, insurers, legal advisors, and claims managers, all become involved, which helps to ensure that the program stays running optimally. Monitoring and improving a risk program is an ongoing process as potential risks continually change and there is always a need for maintaining and improving safety activities and
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
As federal regulators require physicians to do more, they will actually get paid less. As the situation worsens, older doctors will retire and younger doctors will look to switch careers. This will come at a time when the demand for physician services will be higher than ever. Ultimately the consequences of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will translate into restricted access and inferior quality of care. No matter how you look at it, this legislation is terrible for physicians; however, it is always the patient that suffers the most.”
The concern for safety has become a bigger and more important issue, and these two departments are forming a relationship. Although it has been the tradition for these two departments to work separately, they both have a common goal, to oversee the safety and excellence in healthcare organizations. Some smaller organizations have always had the same person control quality and risk and remained successful. These days, we are seeing a lot more collaborations, goal sharing, ad idea exchanging among these two groups (Perry, 2007). Risk management is critical to every organization.
The Joint Commission is involved in making sure the health care facilities are providing the patient and family members of patients the effective and safe care that the patient needs and deserves. There is a close relationship between the National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG) and the results of the Joint Commission survey. If the facility were following the NPSG’s then the facility would have more of likelihood that the organization will receive a good survey results from the Joint Commission. There are serious consequences for the health care organization if the organization does not meet the benchmarks set by the Joint Commission. Multiple tools out there will aid this author in determining if the organization that this author works in is
Risk is a part of daily life, but our attitudes and approaches to risk vary depending on a range of factors such as context, time, situation, previous experience, etc. To assess different situation, we will use different approach as well as if we are considering risk that we are taking in personal life or risks that service user are taking in theirs. The risk assessment process is not about creating huge amounts of paperwork; it is about identifying and taking sensible and proportionate measures to control the risks. The provision of care and support should be tailored to meet the needs of the individual and should encourage them to do what they can for themselves.
Because errors, particularly adverse events, are caused by the cumulative effects of smaller errors within organizational structures and processes of care, focusing on the systemic approach of change focuses on those factors in the chain of events leading to errors and adverse events. From a systems approach, avoidable errors are targeted through key strategies such as effective teamwork and communication, institutionalizing a culture of safety, providing patient-centered care, and using evidence-based practice with the objective of managing uncertainty and the goal of improvement (p.
The Importance of Accountability Why is Accountability so important in the health care industry? Even though a situation may be positive or negative, every aspect of health care needs to be credited to something or someone, with accountability, errors can be fixed and then prevented and helps keep costs down. An employee accountability is measured by customer satisfaction, results of performance, and the cost and impacts of the employee over time, and affects an organization’s working culture by their values, integrity and work ethics. A successful organization follows the checks and balance process, maintains a positive working culture, and stays clear from blame.
The board and directors handle regulators by making sure that the organization has written policy and procedure manuals. The manual helps keep the organization in control so that the regulators can properly assess the organizations. There are steps that the board takes when identifying the financial risk, which are analyzing the risks, reduce and controlling the risks, and giving assurance (Brown, 2010). When analyzing the risk, management must consider likelihood of the risk happening, as well as the impact on the organization if it was to happen. The board will then work with staff to define measures that can be taken to avoid the risks.
Additionally, employees and patients are encouraged to report any factor in the organization environment that could pose a threat to patients as well as
Healthcare organizations should foster a productive and positive working relationship between administrators and medical staff to accomplish the day-to-day tasks and provide quality care to every patient. Medical staff often have deontological views and focus more on providing patient care. Administrators often have utilitarian views and focus on providing quality patient care as well as other managerial duties including staffing, organizing, and fulfilling financial duties for the profitability and viability of the organizations. These somewhat opposing views can create potential problems in the working relationship between administrators and medical staff; therefore, it is important to have a shared mission, vision, values, and goals to
The Joint Commission’s tracer methodology is used to ensure compliance standards are met, as well as to “trace” and document the level of care provided to patients in order to make improvements to the facility’s health care delivery system. Patients requiring services that utilize the entire continuum of care spectrum are selected in an effort to gather sufficient information needed to identify areas with potential risks and safety concerns. As the patients’ course of care progresses across the system, Joint Commission surveyors evaluate each department 's policy and procedure on data management, infection control and medication management process. Health information management is impacted by the “tracer methodology” because HIM must ensure
Valani (2006) states “the second step of the risk assessment process is the security inventory. Typically, a hospital has already deployed various security measures throughout the facility orcampus to resolve past security problems, thus the risk assessment is measuring mitigated risk, in contrast to raw risk.” These security measures may include policies and procedures, physical security equipment, security personnel, or some combination of these measures. Security policies and procedures may
This information is used to appropriately implement prevention and treatment for patients. The second outcome integrates analysis of information gathered by healthcare personnel to identify trends and inconsistencies within the healthcare population. Through this the origin of problems can be ascertained, and preventive measures can be instituted. Subsequently prevention will decrease incidences and ultimately the cost to
The first step; which is identifying the risk is when the group should be able to recognize certain risks and how to prepare to look into them further. Once your team has identified the risks, they should build an understanding of the risk. Evaluating the risk would be determining the severity of the risk because it may not be serious enough for further treatment. After establishing the highest ranking risk, it is management job to minimize the possibilities for them to grow. Even after recognizing all risks it is still risk management job to continue to monitor and prevent any potential risk from
This may include avoidance, reduction, sharing and acceptance. • Control Activities – the policies and procedures that help ensure that management’s risk responses are carried out. • Information & Communication – refers to the proper information being identified, captured and communicated in an adequate format and timeframe to the appropriate individuals. • Monitoring – assessing the functions and components of risk management over time and making adjustments as