Can you imagine being sentenced to life with no parole being a teenager? Opinions are being made about whether or not teens should get tried as adults for serious crimes. Each case is different and it’s a very strong opinion that is hard to decide. Juveniles who commit serious crimes should be tried as adults on a case-by-case basis because studies show that juvenile brains are still developing, because, and because. Juveniles are getting charged as adults in serious crimes. Juveniles are getting sentenced to life with no parole for serious crimes. Should juveniles get treated in such a harsh way at such a young age. Researchers have learned that juveniles' brains are still not fully developed. The rational part of a teen's brain isn't fully developed and won't be until age 25 or so. In fact, recent research has found that adult and teen brains work differently. Adults think with the prefrontal cortex, the brain's rational part.The Information shows that a juveniles brain still isn't fully developed so when juveniles commit serious crimes they are still not aware of what their consequences might be. Clearly this shouldnt be used in every case. Court rooms should go case by case and use a fair justice system to penalize them for their actions. …show more content…
According to data it has been shown that youths of color are more likely than white youths to be arrested and subsequently go deeper into the juvenile justice system. Juveniles are getting wrongfully profiled and prosecuted just for the color of their skin at such a young age this is something that these kids didn't choose to be yet they still have to pay the
According to, “Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults?” it states that,”Most young offenders do not become adult criminals. But when we punish them as adults, we change those odds.” This tells us that the young offenders learn their mistakes but if tried as an adult and punished as if the minor was an adult, then the outcome of it could be much worse. The article also states that their education and future employment chances are marked worse.
Many criminals face many different leading factors that push them to murder someone, yet still receive a form of punishment. Juveniles however, may face these same circumstances yet not share the same treatment. If juveniles have special treatment due to their age, it does not seem fair nor serve equal justice, allowing juveniles to believe they'll have more leniency in the court of law and their sentences. However, despite having knowledge of the severity of their crimes and special treatment given due to age
If the adult brain and Juvenile brain are different than it only seems fair to treat them one another in a peculiar way when relating to crime. It is completely absurd to believe that a 12 year old can be held to the same standards as a 30 year old. Yes some do deserve to be in juvenile hall but not in prison with older inmates who have fully comprehended that what they did was most of the time inexcusable
“The high court’s rulings also took into account new scientific research, including findings that the areas of the brain that deal with decision making, impulsiveness, and consequences are often not fully developed until people are in their 20s,” says Carl Stoffers, publisher of Article Juvenile Justice, Scholastic. Even though people under 20’s brains are not developed, they still make bad decisions, and we cannot speed up the process of development or control them so they do not. They still made that decision and are fully responsible, then they will think twice before committing a crime because they will know that there is a harsh punishment that will encounter them. Juveniles should be completely responsible for the crimes that they themselves make and must go to an adult criminal court of
There are certain instances of juveniles being tried as adults and sometimes ending up getting a life sentence without a chance of parole. I find that pretty harsh because there have been some cases where the juvenile meant no harm, they were either confused or brought along by gang members and they end up being charged along with the gang members for just being with them when a crime goes down. I believe that juveniles do not deserve to be given a life sentence because for one they are still maturing, they can learn from their mistakes and make amends, we still have to combat crimes like intended murder committed by a juvenile with extreme punishments especially if they are well over the age of 16. In the article published by the New York Times on March 14, 2012 “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences”, Garinger discusses that juveniles deserve a second chance since their brains are still developing.
Trying juveniles as adults would not be fair when only 7% of crimes are commited by teens. The first juvenile court was opened in Chicago of 1899. The court was based on two principles: juveniles lack maturity of taking responsibility for their behavior, and their character is not yet fully developed. By being put into a prison specialized for teenagers, their behaviour will have a better chance of changing. Some believe violent teens should be treated as adults, however it is clear that they should be tried as teenagers since their brain aren’t yet developed and they are easier to rehabilitate at a younger age.
The Debate on Trying Juveniles as Adults Juvenile justice is a topic of great importance in our society. When it comes to heinous, felony crimes such as murder and rape, the question of whether juveniles should be tried, adjudicated, and sentenced as adults is a highly debated topic. In my opinion, juveniles who commit such crimes should be treated as adults Juveniles should be tried as adults due to the severity of their heinous, felony crimes and the importance of holding them accountable, while also considering the necessity of rehabilitation within the juvenile justice system My first reason for believing that juveniles who commit heinous, felony crimes should be tried, adjudicated, and sentenced as adults these crimes are incredibly serious and have a significant impact on society. These crimes cause physical and emotional harm to victims and their families, and they create a sense of fear and insecurity in society.
In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that it is immoral to give juveniles life sentences, even if they commit a crime as serious as murder, because it is a cruel and unusual punishment. This has been an issue in America as teenagers are often treated as adults in court due to a belief that their crimes warrant a harsh punishment. Many believe that these kids should not be given such major sentences because they are still immature and do not have the self control that adults do. I agree that juveniles do not deserve life sentences because they put less thought and planning into these crimes and they often are less malicious than adults. The article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” explains that the teenagers lose brain tissue that is responsible for self control and impulses (Thompson 7).
Should Kids Be Tried As Adults? Kids are being tried as adults by our juvenile justice system depending on the crime they commit or by the degree of the murder they commit. The way the crime was committed the way it was planned out plays a major role on the sentence of those victims or kids who are tried as adults. Some kids get locked up their whole life while the others who are given a sentence can be just kept until they turn 25 and they just let them go. This system is criticized by many people who believe that those who commit these crimes and are sentenced to life time without parole are not given a second chance to life.
When teen felons choose to act without thinking, they are putting other people’s lives at risk. They need to be charged as adults because the victims of the crimes will not be given the justice they deserve when they have to worry about that criminal harming them again. Although some people think that sending a juvenile through adult court gives them no hope, they should have given this a little thought before committing the crime. Teens need to think about the consequences and how their actions affect others before they act. When choosing between putting a violent adolescent in prison and taking the chance of letting them commit that crime again, it is most suitable to let the teen be tried as an adult and to place them in prison.
Juveniles should be tried as adults with life without parole but only in certain cases: depending on their motive or modus operandi, their crime, and criminal background. Motivation Scandalous kids who commit crimes for unreasonable motives should most definitely have life without the possibility of parole. In some cases, they’re just doing what they think is best. Jacob Ind, a 15 year old from Colorado, was beaten and sexually molested by his step father. His mother abused him as well.
Juveniles should be tried as adults due to being aware of their crimes and having an intention to kill, however, brain development and maturity can play a role into the reason why teens kill. With being tried as an adult juveniles should be granted the opportunity of freedom pending on their rehabilitation status and if requirements are not met, convicts will have to complete the remainder of their sentence. People have long argued that juveniles who commit a murder should not be tried as an adult due the juvenile not being aware of their crime. Awareness, as defined by the Webster Dictionary, is “the knowledge and understanding that something is happening or exists”. Having the perception to comprehend the occurrence of an event is not a dumbfounded characteristic.
Juvenile Justice Should juveniles get treated as adults that’s one of the biggest controversy in our nation now days, with many juveniles committing crimes that are inconceivable according to their age. Judges have the last word on how to treat this young people. Many people argue that “the teens that are under eighteen are only kids, they won’t count them as young adults, not until they commit crimes. And the bigger the crime, the more eager this people are to call them adults” (Lundstrom 87). This is why people can’t come to a decision as how these young people should be treated like.
Some people believe that juveniles shouldn’t get sentenced to life in prison because of brain studies, age, and the way of living. Recent brain studies have suggested that teenagers suffer from brain-tissue loss, this might be the reason why they commit idiotic decisions. In Gail Garingers article “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” she states “Young people are biologically different from adults.” Then she talks about the young adolescents being sentenced to die in prison. Also how there is a myth about the superpredator and how children are hopelessly
Can you imagine waking up behind closed walls and bars? Waking up to see your inmate who is a 45-year-old bank robber and you are a 14-year-old minor who made a big mistake. This is why minors who have committed crimes should not be treated the same as adults. Some reasons are because the consequences given to minors in adult court would impact a minor’s life in a negative way. If a minor is tried through a juvenile court, they have a greater chance of rehabilitation.