ipl-logo

Kids Are Kids Until They Commit Crimes Essay

650 Words3 Pages

What if your loved one was savagely killed by a teenager with no remorse? Juveniles should be convicted as adults for ferocious crimes because even though they are “kids” they kill innocent people and should get punished for the crime they committed. Teenagers commit gruesome crimes like murder and knowing what they are makes the situation far worse. In the article “Kids are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes” the author Jennifer Jenkins talks about the teenagers that committed gory murders against innocent people that didn’t deserve to die like a road animal. For example, a 13 year old shot to death an english teacher. When a person murders they know what they are doing and killing the teacher for the inarticulate reason that the …show more content…

The Juveniles are kids not adults and that they don’t have the same brain development as adults do. In the article, “Starting finds on Teenage Brains” by Paul Thompson saying that during this time of period in teenagers be having massive loss of brain tissue. It is believed that the massive brain loss tissue supports all teens thinking and emotions. It also says, “Brain cells and connections are only being lost in areas controlling impulses, risk taking and self control.” The frontal tubes can hinder the violent passions, rash actions, and regulate teens emotions throughout the years. Meaning that teenagers aren’t adults yet. Another reason why teens shouldn’t be charge as an adult is because teens commit crimes without thinking what they are doing and they’re still kids. Teenagers make mistakes because they are young and stupid. Some of the teenagers don’t deserve to go to jail and get charge as an adult. For example, Nathaniel Brazill was 13 years old when he was guilty of shooting a middle school and charged with second degree murder. He says that he made a “stupid mistake” but was convicted of second degree murder not first. In the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” it says that, “a child is not a man.” Meaning that a child shouldn 't be getting treated as an adult no they

Show More
Related
1015 Words | 5 Pages

But in my opinion they should be treated as adults according to the way juveniles think, act and they make decisions by themselves. Juveniles act knowing the things they are doing, but they don’t realize the consequence in a future. In the book “Angels of Death True Crime book, Chapter 2 from Derek and Alex king” On November 26, 2001 in Florida Derek, with 13 year old and Alex King, 12 year old they killed their father. Derek kills his dad with a baseball bat when he was sleeping because his dad make them feel uncomfortable also they was mentally abused, after that they burned the house to eliminate all evidence and them they run away.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

Adolescent minds are the most intelligent kind of mind. A young brain is filled with creativity, imagination and innocence. Though the thought process of a teen is assumed to be selfish there are other factors involved. A combination of these characteristics seems almost dangerous. One would undermine a juvenile to use these qualities to manipulate the court for their own selfish wishes or pleasures.

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

In his article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” Thompson exposes the shocking discovery that teens during puberty, experience a massive loss of brain tissue which are only in the areas of controlling impulses, risk-taking, and self-control. Thus, Thompson explains that due to these losses, teens and juveniles are vastly immature and underdeveloped when handling their thoughts and desires. Despite the fact that he officially discovered a biological difference, nevertheless Thompson shares his opinion about juveniles, “Even though normal teens [and juveniles] are experiencing a wildfire of tissue loss in their brains, that does not remove their accountability” (10). What Thompson is really saying here is that although teens are biologically different and immature, it should not be an “exit ticket” for a crime they have committed. In addition, not all teens are equal, as some have proven to use their intelligence and skills to carefully plan a murder over others who have unintentionally done so mistakenly.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

An indication that disproves the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision centers on the idea that one’s age should not be used as an excuse to minimize their punishment. In her essay “On Punishment and Teen Killers”, Jennifer Jenkins supports this by arguing that a juvenile should not use their age as an excuse to get out of trouble with the law. After mentioning the horrific case of a teenager who killed a pregnant woman for satisfaction, it is revealed that the murderer was charged with three life sentences. Despite the murderer’s wicked actions, some people still believed that the murderer did not deserve life sentences just because the killer was not considered a legal adult. To support her argument that age isn’t enough of an excuse, Jenkins writes “There are advocates who wish to minimize

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

At just 14, Young’s brain was certainly not fully developed. Teen brains lack proper decision making skills. The brain is far more irrational, reckless, emotional, and easily influenced than the adult brain. The article “Beautiful Brains”, further expands on this topic, going into depth about what it is exactly that causes juveniles to act this way. The article explains, “The brain undergoes extensive remodeling, resembling a network and a wiring upgrade.”

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

If an adolescent were to commit a horrendous crime such as murder, should they be convicted as guilty or not? Kids at the age 12 should realize what is right from wrong. They obliviously know that if they were to be in a position where they were killing another human, that is just a murderous crime and should be guilty for their actions. In the book Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, a boy named Jack had committed two murders on the island where everyone was stranded. Some people agree that if adolescents were to do something irresponsible and regretful it's because “their brains just haven’t physically matured yet.

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

Subjecting juveniles to adult sentencing raises profound concerns regarding human rights, dignity, and the principle of proportionality in punishment. The ethical principles of justice demand that the punishment fits the crime and considers individual factors like age, mental health, and potential for rehabilitation. Treating young offenders, the same as adults, ignores these important principles. Gorski, in "Sentencing Children As Adults", gives the example of a 12-year-old boy who was sentenced to death in prison for an accidental homicide offense, highlighting the extreme consequences of subjecting juveniles to adult sentencing. "

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that it is immoral to give juveniles life sentences, even if they commit a crime as serious as murder, because it is a cruel and unusual punishment. This has been an issue in America as teenagers are often treated as adults in court due to a belief that their crimes warrant a harsh punishment. Many believe that these kids should not be given such major sentences because they are still immature and do not have the self control that adults do. I agree that juveniles do not deserve life sentences because they put less thought and planning into these crimes and they often are less malicious than adults. The article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” explains that the teenagers lose brain tissue that is responsible for self control and impulses (Thompson 7).

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

Juveniles Should Not Be Tried as Adults In February of 2009, police found the body of “twenty-six year old Kenzie Houk... with a bullet in her head” (Chen). The murder suspect: eleven year old Jordan Brown, her future step-son. At the time, Jordan was an energetic, little fifth-grader. He was just like any other boy. He loved riding his bike, reading Harry Potter, playing football, and spending the weekends hunting with his dad.

Read More
1392 Words | 6 Pages

When people commit crimes, there should be disciplined no matter what. Juveniles need to learn that their behaviors have consequences. Why should kids be given any less of a punishment for committing the same crime? According to one author, “Taking a life is murder regardless of the age of the offender, and the penalties to be imposed must not discriminate. After all, the victim’s life will never be returned, and the family will permanently lose their loved one” (“7 Top Pros and Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As Adults”).

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

If an “undeveloped brain” was the case then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world, which is not. Some of these teens think they can get away with some of these crimes which leads to commit more. In Jennifer's article she explains one of her case with a serial killer. His parents will fix everything whenever he got in trouble. After series of other

Read More
1160 Words | 5 Pages

Juveniles should be tried as adults due to being aware of their crimes and having an intention to kill, however, brain development and maturity can play a role into the reason why teens kill. With being tried as an adult juveniles should be granted the opportunity of freedom pending on their rehabilitation status and if requirements are not met, convicts will have to complete the remainder of their sentence. People have long argued that juveniles who commit a murder should not be tried as an adult due the juvenile not being aware of their crime. Awareness, as defined by the Webster Dictionary, is “the knowledge and understanding that something is happening or exists”. Having the perception to comprehend the occurrence of an event is not a dumbfounded characteristic.

Read More
1291 Words | 6 Pages

Even children have the capability to act and think the way as an adult would. Juveniles need to be held accountable for their actions because it was their actions that caused for them to be put in such a situation. 13 year old Derek King and his 12 year old brother, Alex, were being charged of bludgeoning their father, Terry King, to death. In the book, “Angels of Death,” by Gary C. King stated, “I hit him once and then I heard him moan and then I was afraid that he might wake up and see us, so I just kept on hitting him... I threw the bat on the bed, lit the bed on fire because I was scared of the [evidence] and everything.

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

Some people believe that juveniles shouldn’t get sentenced to life in prison because of brain studies, age, and the way of living. Recent brain studies have suggested that teenagers suffer from brain-tissue loss, this might be the reason why they commit idiotic decisions. In Gail Garingers article “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” she states “Young people are biologically different from adults.” Then she talks about the young adolescents being sentenced to die in prison. Also how there is a myth about the superpredator and how children are hopelessly

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

But this actually disproves juvenile advocates reliance on the “underdeveloped brain” argument. If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world(Jenkins 91). This is something that doesn’t happens, you won’t be seeing teens around the world murdering people. Brain development is just something people don’t understand how it really works and use this argument to try to lower criminals culpability.

Read More

More about Kids Are Kids Until They Commit Crimes Essay

Open Document