Medical Negligence Research Paper

YES! People make mistakes,its called being human. Men are given the nature of human,because there is a reason god is called the almighty. Since no man is perfect in this world ,it is evident that a person who is skilled and has knowledge over a particular subject can also commit mistakes during his practice.

In conclusion, the idea of legalizing euthanasia could be very detrimental and could cause more misfortune than good. Doctors were placed on Earth to fulfill the one purpose that was given to them and that is to prolong the lives of patients and to abide by the Hippocratic Oath. With euthanasia being illegal in the majority

An error of judgment constitutes negligence only if a reasonably competent professional with the standard skills that the defendant professes to have, and acting with ordinary care, would not have made the same error . Doctors must exercise an ordinary degree of skill. However, they cannot give a warranty of the perfection of their skill or a guarantee of cure. If the doctor has adopted the right course of treatment, if she/ he is skilled and has worked with a method and manner best suited to the patient, she/ he cannot be blamed for negligence if the patient is not totally cured.

It is very difficult to define negligence;however,the concept has been accepted in jurisprudence . Negligence by doctors has to be determined by the judges who are not trained in medical science. They rely on experts’ opinion and decide on the basis of basic principles of reasonableness and prudence. This brings into a lot of subjectivity into the decision and the effort is to reduce it and have certain objective criteria .This may sound simple but is tremendeouly difficult as medical profession evolves ans experimentation helps in its evolution.

A doctor may have to operate even in the absence of consent, to save the life of the patient. It is possible that even with such an intervention, the patient may not survive. Assuming that the doctor is competent and has exercised due care and diligence, the doctor cannot be held responsible for a patient's death, as the doctor has acted in good faith and in the best interest of the patient. Maintaining a good Doctor patient relationship often works better than the best informed consent!

Human Experimentation The looming concern of human experimentation was enough to deter some individuals from seeking the medical care that they needed for their well-being. The thought that trusted medical professionals had the power to perform unethical experiments on them while they were in their care was enough to let them live with whatever ailment that they had. By not seeking out the care that they desperately needed in some cases only lead to further problems. Several doctors abused their patients' trust for their own curiosities.

Some of the types of hospital negligence include inadequate staffing, inadequate supervision, inadequate management or the failure to perform properly understands diagnostic tests and proper care. However it occurs, there is no excuse for placing patients in danger by providing inadequate or negligent care. Licensed and regulated by Federal and State law, hospitals must adhere to certain policies and procedures in order to ensure the health and well-being of their patients. When patients are injured due to negligence, hospitals are liable for the injuries they

The AANS, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, states that a “Bill is common sense, proven, comprehensive medical liability reform that will help contain health care costs” (Kindy). Doctors are constantly afraid and fearful that they will get sued for reasons that they can not explain. No doctor is safe from lawsuit abuse (Pear). Lawmakers understand this and they wanted to begin to put regulations on

Along with his lack of communication he also was seen “speaking to a patient inappropriately while trying to obtain their consent to a repeated attempt at a cannulation (intravenous line) procedure when working as a surgical SHO”(8), this particular incident relates to the question excellently, this behaviour is completely inappropriate, furthermore the doctor in question was a Senior House Officer (SHO); a trusted, senior doctor who is looked to for a good

The doctor does not have the right to hold information from the patient or their family. In addition, holding information about a diagnostic goes against the principles of being a doctor and looking for the well-being of patients. Patients are the ones that decide how to face the bad news. On the other hand, the doctor should speak with total honesty because it is the patients right to know about their medical status. As every person in this earth, patients have goals and dreams that they want to achieve before their death.

However, the negative views of this practice seem to overshadow the positive and assumptions are made that Physician-assisted suicide is an impractical way of ending a life. This practice is deemed as the worst from views of ethics, religion, medical practice, and more. However, it is an option and an option that does not have to be chosen if not wanted. That is what is ignored, but that is what people need to realize. No life has to be taken, but the option of ending your life peacefully should not be taken as well.

In some ways, the growing awareness of concussions has created a new market for entrepreneurs to cash in on. The advantage of this is that there are some good products out there. However, we are also witnessing a flooding in the market with pricey products that have no scientific evidence to back them up. You also have to be careful because of certain clinics that have been opened and staffed by so-called specialists who have no training or expertise on alleviating the symptoms of brain injury. Buyers have to beware because everything from physical therapists to dermatologists to orthopedists have opened these unscrupulous clinics across the country.

There are three implications that would occur if a change in law were past, one would be the change in palliative care. Adequate palliative care is a prerequisite to the legalization of medical aid in dying. Patients should never have to choose death because of unbearable pain, which can be treated but cannot be accessed. It is wrong to deny grievously ill patients the option of medical aid in dying because of systematic inadequacies in the delivery of palliative care. Safeguarding patients by building a strong patient physician relationship must be established so that there is no foul play in the outcome.

The Lacks family would probably disagree with this argument, since their experience with a cell “abduction” has led to neglect, withholding of information, and a dehumanization resulting from lack of credit and recognition given to Henrietta Lacks. Despite all of the grievances and injustices, the Lacks cannot deny the scientific uses and progress enabled by the cells; one can only wonder what would have become of medical research if the HeLa line had not been

Violations of this law may include disciplinary actions, criminal penalties and fines, and possibly imprisonment. To conduct this investigation, the first step I would need to take is to find out whether HIPAA trainings were conducted though all the staff members at this hospital. Many people violate HIPAA laws without even being aware that they are in contravention. Ultimately, it is the hospital’s responsibility to ensure that their staff members are trained on these laws to ensure compliance, and reduce violations. Although the lack of awareness of HIPAA violation laws is not an excuse, this is also a matter to be taken into consideration before concluding my final decision.