Michel Foucault: The Construction Of Discourse

1045 Words5 Pages

There is such a variety of definitions regarding discourse that make it difficult to stick to one definition, therefore the context to which discourse is used is helpful to narrowing down a less diverse definition.
Michel Foucault (philosopher, social theorist and literary critic) used various definitions of discourse at separate instances. The rough definition that Foucault suggests for Discourse is ‘the general domain of all statements’. He also defines discourse as an adapted cluster of statements, which could relate to the distinct structures in discourse. Discourse has to do with distinguishing groups of statements which are controlled in a way that they match and reach a mutual effect. An example of this would be a discourse on nature.
Another definition of discourse that Foucault provides is a controlled practice that justifies a lot of statements. This definition isn’t related to a certain statement but rather with things which directs discourse in general such as the guidelines and structures.
Foucault deals with the theory that the construction of discourse is simultaneously structured by a particular amount of practises in every culture. The restriction of discourses in specific societies is of vital significance as its discourse that comprises the …show more content…

Power is all over, nobody is either lacking power or outside the restraint of power. It isn’t people who are armed with power; but rather discourse as well as the discursive relations which view and establish people as followers. o To Foucault, a king is the same represented by power as are his followers. As a result power isn’t immovable; power doesn’t advance from a key point. Power can be recognised as a complicated group of dealings at work in a specific location. It is that which ensues from various areas in a society, together with those areas portrayed as conquered. Power generates

Open Document