The 2012, the election was primarily between candidates Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. They both were very different, and had and still have incredibly different viewpoints for this country and its future. As you know, Obama won, but they both had many thoughts and opinions about the country during their election. An example of that, is their views on energy. This essay will focus on their different and similar views on how to handle energy in the Unites States. First, I’ll start with Mitt Romney. This was the countries majority liked republican candidate. He was the closest to being president versus current President Obama. His views on energy were very clear. He wanted them to come back to the United States. Oil, gas, coal, nuclear, and other energy sources, he thought needed to be controlled independently by the nation itself. By saying that energy should come back the US, he also pointed out that there would be more US jobs available, which was a strong point on his end. Romney also acknowledged the rise in gasoline prices, and pointed out that he supported ethanol subsidies. Ethanol …show more content…
Obama was the favored democrat candidate, and eventually got elected for his second term for president. Obama’s viewed the way oil had been going as positive. He once stated that since he took over as president the US’s dependence on foreign oil had decreased by 50%, which, is a first time in more than 10 years. He also pointed out that on top of oil companies getting profit, they are still getting billions of extra dollars from taxes every year. Obama stated that he thinks some if not all of the money should be changed and to be put into research for better sources of energy and/or to be put into funding these sources. Obama also spoke on using plants and natural and renewable resources to make gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel, rather than using up all of the drilled oil. Obama was more for conserving and altering how energy is
In addition, we depend on oil and natural gas for energy to drive our cars, heat our houses, provide air
The author of the article Greg Ip, believes that despite Obama’s statement, the President knows very well that even though the pipeline will not go into fruition, fossils fuels will still
He talks about the possible benefits of the drilling while showing how they do not compare to the downsides by saying “At best, the Arctic Refuge might provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day. We can easily conserve more than that amount by driving more fuel-efficient vehicles. Instead of tearing open the heart of our greatest refuge, we should use our resources more wisely.” Carter explains that even though a small percentage of our daily use will be covered by drilling into the Arctic Refuge, there are much better ways to go about it that don’t involve destroying nature. More fuel-efficient vehicles are given as an example that could be seen as an alternative solution that doesn’t damage the wildlife.
The energy crisis began after OPEC seized oil production because of the, “anger at the United States for aiding Israel.” (Farber, 22) This caused a mass panic amongst Americans and resulted in long waits to get gas and constant fuel outages. Carter was extremely adamant that Americans reduce their consumption of fuel in order to reduce the extent of the energy crisis, at one point suggesting putting heavy penalizing taxes on non-fuel efficient vehicles. Political journalist Nicholas Lemann recalled, “[The energy crisis was] the automotive equivalent to the Depression’s bank runs.”
The purpose of the course is to improve energy literacy, attract students to energy careers and foster energy sector research and innovation (EERE, “Energy 101”, n.d.). The course is designed to be delivered in a semester and is broken into five units that cover the energy literacy principles and fundamental concepts outlined in the EERE’s Energy Literacy Framework. The development of this program was led by the Department of Energy in conjunction with the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities and the Oak Ridge Association of Universities and the Environmental and Energy Study Institute. The course outline has since been used by the University of Maryland to create a pilot energy fundamentals course. To support this initiative an Energy 101 Dialogue Series was developed to discuss best practices for teaching about energy in a post-secondary context and to support a community of practice of energy experts (EERE, “Energy 101”, n.d., para
Drilling in Alaska would not solve gasoline and oil problems. This is because in Document C it shows a study that it would only reduce US oil imports by 4%, which means it won't make that
Since he left office, there have been many proposals to open the Arctic Refuge coastal plain to oil drilling. They’ve all been denied because of the opposition by the American people, including the Gwich’in Athabascan Indians of Alaska and Canada, indigenous people whose culture has depended on the Porcupine caribou herd for thousands of years. The short-term economic gain is not worth destroying their homes. He said the Arctic Refuge may provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day. We can easily conserve more than that amount by driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, we should just use our resources more wisely instead.
Bill McKibben is considered to be America’s first environmentalist activist. His project 350.org works to spread awareness of climate change around the world. Without his push to end projects such as the Keystone Pipeline, the planet would quickly reach the uninhabitable state he fears. While it’s too late to reverse the damages already done, he encourages everyone to do their part to keep the world from getting any worse. His efforts, along with activists around the world, have successfully divested $2.6 trillion in oil drilling funds, and while the few oil companies are still hanging on by a thread with support from large private businesses or people like the Koch family, clean sources of energy are becoming increasingly popular in the
The Federal Governments Initiatives to Implement Renewable Energy Currently the federal government uses fossil fuels as their main source of energy, but the efforts to implement alternative sources are steadily rising. These types of energies are referred to as renewable meaning they are generated by fuel sources that restore themselves over a short period of time and do not diminish. Some examples of renewable energy include wind, solar, hydroelectric, geothermal, and etc. The three major fossil fuels used in the United States are petroleum, natural gas, and coal and they accounted for most of the nation's energy production in 2014. An article from the U.S. Energy Information Administration provides that usage of energy as the following – natural gas 31%, petroleum 26%, coal 24%, renewable energy 11%, and nuclear electric power 9%.
Distillation, the procedure by which oil is warmed and isolated in various segments, is the main stage in refining. Albeit non-renewable energy sources like coal have been reaped in somehow for quite a long time, raw petroleum was first found and created amid the Industrial Revolution, and its modern uses were first created in the nineteenth century. Recently designed machines upset the way we do work, and they relied upon these assets to run. Today, the world's economy is to a great extent reliant on petroleum products , for example, unrefined petroleum, and the interest for these assets frequently start political agitation, since few nations control the biggest repositories. Like any industry, free market activity vigorously influences the costs and benefit of unrefined petroleum.
For the citizens, “fracking will give them jobs so they can make money and support their families” (Rogowsky). Furthermore, with the addition of fracking “the United States can get about 1.8 trillion barrels of shale (“sedimentary rocks that have rich sources of petroleum and natural gas” (Rogowsky)) a year compared to Saudi
Second, in regards to environmental issues, this party believes that: there is an ample supply of good sources of energy (oil, gas,
When it comes to Energy and Oil I was kind of split on this one I think New Alternatives need to be found I totally agree that solar is the best way to go for the future! But Donald Trump is correct the pay off for it is years down the road and oil truly is the bloodline of this particular
The United States uses much more oil than the average country. From 1970 to 2002, the
The necessity for energy became a growing demand at a global level. With many different minds governing around the world, each inevitably turns to a unique way to meet their demands. The majority relying on what produces the greatest amount as quickly as possible and few on what could be harnessed from nature. From the sun’s powerful rays, to the strong winds, and even nuclear forms, world powers have established their own ways to produce their energy and do not seek changes. Whichever type of energy a given country decides to use, each has its own positives and negatives aspects.