The Moon Landings are Real
The issue with the moon landings in the 1960’s is that no one knows if they’re real or not. I’m sure most people believe they’re real, but there are some doubters out there. The problem being that some people believe it without real hard evidence to back them up. I’m here to show you what you should really believe.
It is my personal belief that the moon landings are very real. So today I’m going to set out to bring you around to my side of the argument. This essay will include many reasons and evidence so that by the end there will be very little doubt that I’m right.
The evidence for the faked moon landings are actually pretty convincing, but I will convince you they are wrong. Some people believe that the moon rocks the astronauts brought back are actually from some kind of meteorite that might have crashed into the moon. The scientists can actually prove that the rocks …show more content…
This points to the fact that they filmed the whole thing in a studio. But I know that the Soviet Union had previously sent unmanned probes before the U.S. What could have happened is the Soviet Union carved the “c” into the rock. Or it 's just a little coincidence.
Time to switch gears and tell you why I am right, with evidence. First off, there were thousands of people working on this space project. They would all have to be bribed to keep the biggest secret in history. It just doesn 't add up. Really I can understand that some people didn 't know about it being fake. But you still have all the film crews that have to keep quiet. There’s just no sense in it.
Now that we’ve covered that, we will talk about mirrors. When the astronauts went to the moon, they left mirrors. So when the scientists at NASA fired lasers at the mirrors, the lasers reflected off the mirrors and came back to Earth. There’s really nothing else to say about the
Because this text is intended for a worldwide audience, the author uses language that most people will be able understand. In addition a lot of information that common people would like to know is included. The subject is the lunar landing and the speaker is a writer at the times magazine who has viewed the moon landing. This is the reason why the writer is able to explain in detail what happened.
Millions of people also say they were real. If they were faked then why? I’m Sam Burmeister and I think the moon landings were fake. There is lot’s of evidence supporting each side of the argument.
Conspiracy theories have become a real complication and are used to find out if something that was planned is actually true or a hoax. Some examples of these are the existence of bigfoot, mass shootings set forth by political parties, and the events that took place on September 11, 2001. Many of these conspiracy theories have multiple sides and viewpoints for people to gather and form ideas of what they think happened. One of the most debated conspiracy theories was the moon landing. On July 20, 1969, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin stepped off the Apollo 11 landing craft onto the foreign landscape of the moon and said these words,’That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.”
It was a great day for America as we won the “Space Race” and got safely to the moon, but not everyone was happy. In this essay, I will be talking about why some conspiracy theorists think that the historical moon landing of 1969 was staged and why I still believe that it was in fact, real. To begin, I will be showing you some evidence theorists use to support their claim of the landing being fake. The first is that when
Moon Landing Conspiracy Theory “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind,” (Neil Armstrong, 1969). At first glance, it may seem like we actually sent people to the moon and they returned safely. People have failed to notice, however, that NASA didn’t cover up everything completely when faking the first moon landing. If people continue to believe that America sent people on the moon and that they returned unharmed, they will never understand the larger question of exactly how they did it. That is, if they actually did.
Most people take for granted that the US moon landing really did happen. Surprisingly, there are many who believe that the entire event was completely staged. In fact, if one were to google the moon landing, they would discover there are countless websites devoted to both sides of this argument. The purpose of this essay is to settle this question and provide undeniable proof that on July 20, 1969 the Apollo 11 team made history and put the first man on the moon.
Ultimately, the 1995 movie comes fairly historically accurate in its displays of the events and the setting, but the film did include scenes of characters that were exaggerated in personality or arguments in order to establish a much more interesting story than what actually happened. Annotated Bibliography Thesis: Apollo 13 is actually pretty historically accurate but had a few inaccuracies put in to actually make the movie interesting in its portrayal of the characters involved, the events that transpired, and the setting, both outside of Earth and on Earth, of the Apollo mission at the beginning of the 70’s. Sources: #1.Smithsonian Channel. https://www.smithsonianchannel.com/videos/duct-tape-and-ingenuity-save-the-day/17208(Accessed February 14, 2018.)
The moon landing mission housed a great accomplishment for the world. They burst through the glass that separated space and soil. The three authors are all well known publishers and writers. Authors all over the world found these pieces effective and reliable.
Then, the "historic event" was sent through television to the entire world who, for the most part, believed it. But if the moon landing was a hoax, thousands of people were involved. The conspiracy theorists say that the witnesses must have been disposed of. The people who believe the moon landing really happened say that it is just common sense that so many people couldn 't have been in on such a complex plan, therefore the moon landing had to have happened.
According to Nielsen reports and broadcast records from 1969, a total of 123 million Americans tuned in to watch this momentous moment in history, where America had again gained the edge over the Soviets in the Cold War. It was such an impressive achievement that average Americans didn’t even acknowledge its significance until later. To them it was an impressive and emotional event filled with determination, happiness, pride and awe that someone had walked on the moon. Over half a billion people worldwide tuned into the broadcast, simply awed and astounded at the accomplishment. (Doc 2) People flocked to the event at parties and gatherings all across the nation.
On July 20th, 1969, the Apollo 11 with astronaut Neil Armstrong and his crew, guided by thousands of NASA technicians, supposedly landed on the surface of the moon. It was certainly one of the most extraordinary events accomplished by mankind up to that date. Neil Armstrong’s first words upon stepping on the moon surface will always be remembered “ A small step for mankind, a giant leap for humanity”. Ever since then, this achievement has been a matter of discussion by several groups that either believed or disbelieved this.
The army found a UFO crash and on a mountain but they got rid of it, so people wouldn't find it and put it on the news. Lots of people have seen and taken pictures and put it on line and make stories about them so people can see them. My first fact is, NASA found tons of alien activity in space on one of the planets. My reason and evidence is a man named Scott found a UFO flying in the air.
The moon has been our shadow for billions of years. But no scientists are completely sure how the moon was formed or it's origin. The four main theories focused on today are the Fission theory, the Capture Theory, the Co-accreation, and the Giant Impact Theory. However, the theory that is most accepted and most logical is the Giant Impact Theory.
So, the main question is, is the lunar effect a pseudoscience or a science. To answer this a person must first ask themselves, can this idea be processed through the scientific method. The method consists of making a hypothesis, testing a hypothesis with an experiment, observing the experiment, collecting data, and then concluding whether the hypothesis was a correct one due to the data you collected and observed. Well, the hypothesis for the overall lunar effect would be that the moon affects human behavior in multiple ways including fertility, behavior itself, menstruation, sleep, and other actions of human life. It sounds like a very scientific idea, but a person could not test most of the notions mentioned.
“Fundamental to the conspiracy theory is our supposed inability to go to the Moon. The thought of humans traveling to the Moon was so fantastic even early science-fiction writers didn't predict it happening for centuries to come”(Villard). The rockets that made the moon landing possible were based upon the principles that were founded by Isaac Newton centuries ago, meaning that the underlying science was already there. The Saturn V rockets were more than capable of taking a man to the moon, and it was seen by thousands of eyewitnesses and media who saw the rocket blast off from the Kennedy space center in Florida (Villard). Those who claim that NASA could not reach the moon in the 1960’s discredit the hardworking engineers and scientists who paved the way for a lunar