ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Long Walk To Freedom And Mahatma Gandhi

1243 Words5 Pages

“Do not judge me by my successes, judge me by how many times I fell down and got back up again.” - Nelson Mandela. Nelson Mandela was a human rights activist for South Africa. “Live like you could die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.” - Mahatma Gandhi. Mahatma Gandhi was an activist for human rights in India. The two people I will be talking about are Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela, who were both activists for human rights in their countries. Even though Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela both worked in different countries, they both fought for human rights. Even though Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi had books made about them and showed how much people looked up to them, Long Walk to Freedom showed how much Nelson Mandela …show more content…

But, when he struggled to defend human rights’, he realized something. That not even the people who take away a man’s freedom, are not free. When Mandela went to prison, his view on human rights’ changed. He started to realize that he wasn’t the only one not free, that everyone else around was not free either. In paragraph ten it says, “It was during those long and lonely years that my hunger for the freedom of my own people became a hunger for the freedom of all people, white and black. I knew as well as I knew anything that the oppressor must be liberated just as surely as the oppressed. A man who takes away another man’s freedom is a prisoner of hatred, he is locked behind the bars of prejudice and narrow-mindedness.” “A man who takes away another man’s freedom is a prisoner of hatred,” this talks about everyone is not free. Not even the people who are taking away another man’s freedom. It’s a never ending cycle of oppressed and oppressors. But, in paragraph 7, it talks about have two obligations. “In life, every man has twin obligations—obligations to his family, to his parents, to his wife and children; and he has an obligation to his people, his community, his country. In a civil and humane society, each man is able to fulfill those obligations according to his own inclinations and abilities… I did not in the beginning choose to place my people above my family, but in attempting to serve my people, I found that I was prevented from serving my obligations as a son, a brother, a father, and a husband.” Mandela struggled to be with his family when he fought for human rights. He lost touch with his family when he served the people of South

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Letter From Birmingham Jail And Walk To Freedom

    1132 Words  | 5 Pages

    This essay compares and contrast the following two readings: “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Junior and “Walk to Freedom” by Nelson Mandela. This essay will prove why Martin Luther King’s method for achieving justice for all is the most compelling and why. Martin Luther King’s method is effective because it peacefully allows the issue to be known and ultimately leads to the possibility of negotiating. In addition, this method also invites people who normally would not get involved in civil rights issues to get involved. Nelson Mandela’s method is not effective because it makes the oppressed as guilty as the oppressors and makes people less open to negotiating.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Malcolm X And Mlk

    200 Words  | 1 Pages

    Though they were both human rights activists, they had different beliefs about what they were fighting

    Read More

  • Fahrenheit 451 Gandhi

    380 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mahatma Gandhi was a civil rights leader. Gandhi is credited with freeing India from British rule. Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869. He studied in London to become a lawyer and went to South Africa to practice law. While he was in South Africa he began to congregate with the Indian population and held silent strikes against social injustices (Biography.com).

    Read More

  • Summary In The View From The Bottom Rail

    1160 Words  | 5 Pages

    Men owned men because of the color of their skin. These ex-slaves were uneducated and were scared of any change in their lives. What could be theirs today, may not be theirs tomorrow. It’s a shame that people had to live in fear of the government taking something away from them and all they did was share part of their lives to be documented and the documentation was not even accurate. “Freedom had come to a nation of four million slaves, and it changed their lives in deep and important ways.

    Read More

  • Robert F Williams Radio Free Dixie Chapter Summaries

    704 Words  | 3 Pages

    He had seen firsthand how African Americans experienced brutality growing up. He had seen this when Jess Alexander Helms a police officer brutalized a black woman, and dragged her to the jail house. He had explained it as “the way a caveman would club and drag his sexual prey”. This shows how little rights African Americans had in these days because he was unable to do anything. All of this happened while other African American individuals walked away hurriedly.

    Read More

  • Fight For Freedom Frederick Douglass Rhetorical Analysis

    790 Words  | 4 Pages

    In order to make progress from the oppression upon the black community, Douglass advocates for people to take a stand on the struggle for freedom. Douglass implies that the people will have to fight for freedom by voicing their opinions. Douglass incorporates examples from slaves in other places that have overcome their oppressors in hopes of making it more evident that, indeed, there is a way out of oppression. The idea is that it must be done so by action and not merely by letting others take it upon them . It will not be an easy task, but it has to start off by recognizing that there is a problem.

    Read More

  • Frederick Douglass Argument Against Slavery

    442 Words  | 2 Pages

    ¨Freedom means you are unobstructed in living your life as you choose. Anything less is a form of slavery.¨ This is similar to Frederick Douglass because he lived his most of his life in slavery and then after slavery ended he chose to live his life the way he wanted. Frederick Douglass was an African American slave who wanted to abolish slavery after hearing the word abolish so many times. Douglass´s audience were many other African Americans who also said slavery was a bad thing. How slavery was bad for slaves and how it corrupts slave owners.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Gandhi And Kamehameha

    90 Words  | 1 Pages

    Kamehameha and Gandhi were both effective leaders because they both made a bold move, they both made the society better, and they both helped their own country. However, some differences were that they were born in a different level of class, Kamehameha fought physically when Gandhi didn’t, and lastly, the two leaders wanted different things. While Kamehameha wanted to rule, Gandhi wanted peace. Even though Kamehameha and Gandhi were effective leaders, they both had a different plan and strategy to fight. On the other hand, they were both amazing leaders.

    Read More

  • Inequality In Martin Luther King's Letter From A Birmingham Jail

    963 Words  | 4 Pages

    Inequality and racism have always been present in the history of America. Many people battle these injustices through different forms, such as writing, speaking, or protesting. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Frederick Douglass are both experienced in writing and speaking against certain injustices. In Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “Letter From a Birmingham Jail,” as well as in Frederick Douglass’s “What to the Slave, is the Fourth of July?” they claim that injustice and inequality must be combatted in order for everyone to be free and equal.

    Read More

  • Frederick Douglass Rhetorical Analysis

    935 Words  | 4 Pages

    Douglass quickly remembers that “the ferocious beasts of the forest lie in wait for their prey.” He understands that so long as he is a black man in a white man’s country he will never truly be free. At any given moment a white man can capture him and return him to

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King And Civil Disobedience

    1845 Words  | 8 Pages

    Civil Disobedience Compare and Contrast Henry Thoreau and Martin Luther King both wrote persuasive discussions that oppose many ideals and make a justification of their cause, being both central to their argument. While the similarity is obvious, the two essays, Civil Disobedience by Thoreau and Letter from a Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr. do have some similarities. King tries persuading white, southern clergymen that segregation is an evil, unfair law that ought to defeat by use of agitation of direct protesting. Thoreau, on the other hand, writes to a broader, non-addressed audience, and focuses more on the state itself. He further accepts it at its current state, in regard to the battle with Mexico and the institution of slavery.

    Read More

  • How Does Nelson Mandela Use Ethos In I Am Prepared To Die

    800 Words  | 4 Pages

    I have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black domination.” When he says this it gives people an emotional connection to how Mandela feels about racial discrimination and apartheid. Mandela simply wants a United South Africa with no discrimination. It shows his moral and his values. Mandela came into the courtroom not to plead guilty, but to plead not guilty.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Thoreau And Gandhi

    472 Words  | 2 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Between the 2 articles on similar themes, there are 4 reasons. (1) Gandhi and Thoreau both would not agree in certain things like laws. (2) Gandhi and Thoreau discussed civil disobedience. (3) Gandhi and Thoreau were influenced in writing their expressions, and how both wrote their expressions against the government and laws. Gandhi and Thoreau have different perspectives of the laws, and what people should follow.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Malcolm X And Mahatma Gandhi

    1225 Words  | 5 Pages

    Malcolm X and Mahatma Gandhi were two incredible men, both fighting for independence among their people. These distinctly different men were among the strongest fighters who set foot in authority. Malcolm X, an African-American leader spread religion to combat the weakening of his fellow African-Americans, as well as to expand the supporters of Muslim beliefs. Mahatma Gandhi, a leader in India’s independence movement from the British, weakened British rule through civil resistance. While Malcolm X and Gandhi both fought for their people’s freedom, their religion, beliefs, and methods for achieving independence differ in certain aspects but also have similar elements.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Osama Gandhi

    277 Words  | 2 Pages

    Without a doubt Mahatma Gandhi and Osama Bin Laden are two very different people. Their perspectives on life are vastly different and could even be called opposites. Their ideals couldn’t possibly be more different. While one stands for violence, the other stops it. One controls people through fear and strength, and the other encourages people through peace and justice.

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Long Walk To Freedom And Mahatma Gandhi

Open Document