Over the course of the 19th century, Otto von Bismarck, the leader of Prussia and eventual Chancellor of Germany, played a major role in the orchestration of Germany’s unification. The unification of the plethora of Germany’s states transmogrified the European landscape and played a crucial role in the ultimate defeat of France. Germany had become a dichotomized confederation, influenced by the prodigious Austrian and Prussian Empires. The states of Germany saw the Austrian and Prussian Empires as the only forces that could unify the confederation completely, and thus, a struggle of power began. In his 1856 letter to Minister von Manteuffel, Bismarck made a bold and poignant prediction regarding the future of Germany. “I wish only to express …show more content…
Following seven weeks of malicious carnage, Prussia reigned victorious over Austria with the support of the Italian state. Prussia’s victory resulted in the annexation of Hanover, Frankfurt, Nassau, amongst several other territories. In addition, Austria’s defeat resulted in the dissolution of the German Confederation, the formation of North German Confederation, and Austria’s ultimate exclusion from Germany. “If Austria were severely injured, she would become the ally of France and every other opponent of ours…” Bismarck remarked following the end of The Austro-Prussian War. In the end, Bismarck’s prediction held true, but the value of Austria as an ally to the newly formed Confederation was too great to ignore (Doc 5). Bismarck’s statement was reflective of a new chapter for a unified Germany, whose future would be decided by her allies, and of course, her enemies. In his 1856 letter, Bismarck was the leader of Prussia, desperately vying for control of The German Confederation, and fearing the imminent war before him. A decade later, he was The Chancellor of a unified Germany, meticulously examining the landscape of the European continent as a chessboard that would determine the vitality of his Confederation as a whole. Overall, these documents allow us to see the transpiration of Germany’s unification, from the years
At the end of World War II, Western European powers sought political stability after a period of turmoil and devastation. Germany was divided into two spheres of influence: East Germany, controlled by the Soviet Union, and West Germany, controlled by the Allies. Western Europe attempted to unify in the post-war economy, and various views arose regarding this potential unity. The unification of Western Europe was met with opinions that were largely motivated by a nation’s own economic and political interests.
Compare and contrast the foreign policies of Bismarck vs. Kaiser Wilhelm. How were their decisions significant to WWI? (At least three paragraphs). (9 PTS) Otto Von Bismarck was the prime minister of Prussia from 1862 to 1873, and the chancellor of the German empire from 1871 to 1890. Overtime, Germany began to trust his judgement and followed every order that was appointed by him.
(Purpose Doc 1) The excerpts from the English translation of the Triple Alliance details the agreement between Italy, Germany and Austria-Hungary to protect each other in the event of an attack from another country. This again shows how various countries were allying with each other in preparation for war. In doing so, they made World War I much larger than it truly needed to be. (Doc 3)
It didn’t prevent an independent West Germany, but rather it fastened Allied plans to set up the state. It also led to the creation of the North Atlantic Treaty
The lack of support for Austria also led to German unification. Austria’s
Bismarck’s next move was to make France, which had been a historic enemy to the Germanic people, appear as the aggressor in a third war. This third war was to get the remaining countries that had stayed out of the first two wars, that had growing nationalistic feelings, to enter this final war against their neighboring country. This final war ended when Napoleon the Third left the throne and France wanted peace with the North German
Vo, Kayla Period 3 3/28/14 The Nazi Party’s Ascension to Power in Germany The signing of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 intended to bring worldwide peace after World War I and to penalize Germany for being responsible for the casualties that resulted. The penalty caused Germany to lose its pride, power, and nationalism, thus leaving the country in a helpless economic state and in an abyss. This poor condition after the Great War in 1918 caused citizens to have a strong will for change, which provided the perfect stage for political parties to rise in power. One political party in particular, the National Socialist German Worker's Party--otherwise known as the Nazi Party--captured the interest of the German public.
( Doc 5 ) Otto von Bismarck’s speech about how he would do anything to unify Germany shown the influence that nationalism brings. Otto said he considered absolutism and constitutionalism the best forms of government instead of dictatorship. He was an opponent of nationalism and he realized that
In 1871, central government was appear and Germany become a unified country. 3. What special role did Prussia play? Prussian’s special role is dominated the 25’s sovereign states.
Starting in 1815, 39 German states shaped a free gathering called the German Confederation. The Austrian Empire overwhelmed the confederation. Prussia was prepared to unify all the German states. Prussia lead German Unification, Prussia appreciated a few favorable circumstances that would in the long run offer it some assistance with forging a solid German state. Accordingly, patriotism really bound together Prussia.
The purpose of this document was to unite the Southern German states because Bismarck believed that he would win the support of the people to unite all of Germany if they faced an external threat. It talks about how the French ambassador came to the King to ask him to stop having members of his family from controlling the spanish throne due to the fact that it would threaten France. The king politely refused, marking the end of the conversation. However, Bismarck altered the situation and made it seem like the French Ambassador offended the king and the king had offended the French Ambassador, initiating the start of the Franco-Prussian
German unity also helped with the rise of Anti-Semitism in the mid-1800s. Before the German people were unified the country did not have a single nation but many different German speaking kingdoms. Nationalist in Germany wanted all the kingdoms to come together and make one big Germany to combat other European super powers such as France, Britain, and Russia. The road to German unification was not easy and when thing became ruff, the German people blamed their problems on the Jews.
The 19th century was a time of unification and centralization for the countries of Italy and Germany. Unification was a very controversial subject in Italy at the time because people’s opinions varied with residency, social class, religious affiliation, gender, occupation, and ideological outlook. Residency, occupation, and political power affected the point of views of the authors the most in the documents. Besides the debate of whether or not Italy should be unified, questions regarding how Italy would become centralized or why Italy should not be unified were a major factor when determining the future of Italy. For example, if Italy were to be unified, would the political system be a republic or monarchy.
To avoid acting as the “anvil or “bondsmen” of the European continent, they must take militant actions. To prove this notion, Document D, alludes to Frederick the Great, who lead the Prussian empire into several battles and was deemed victorious in every one of his battles. He did not necessarily have to go to war, but he did so and obtained many advantages. General Friedrich von
Otto von Bismarck used political wit and risk-taking to facilitate efforts towards German unification. Through Realpolitik, “...the pursuit of a Nation’s self-interest based on a realistic assessment of costs and consequences of action.” A political theory in which realistic, practical strategies are utilized over strategies of ideological or moral consideration. Because Realpolitik in a doctrine that acts in the self-interest of the state, it is qusai-nationalistic. Through Realpolitik, Bismarck gained significant leverage over Austria in the Schleswig-Holstein Question, the Austro-Prussian War of 1866, and considerable leverage over France in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71.