BOOK REVIEW
Providing Peacekeepers: The Politics, Challenges and Future of United Nations Peacekeeping Contributions edited by Alex J. Bellamy and Paul D. Williams, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. pp.447
Peacekeeping is one of the most unsettled notions in international relations and has a direct bearing on the functionalities of the law of international organizations. Its nature has evolved dramatically from being just a peace building mechanism to dealing with other ancillary issues. It now implies establishing setups for administrative purposes, human rights monitoring, humanitarian aid, demining etc. What makes peacekeeping all the more interesting is that it is not just United Nations (UN) which is responsible for undertaking
…show more content…
Smith in his chapter on the United States of America (US) brings out the paradox of US involvement with peacekeeping. With an air of American exceptionalism Smith brings forth varied conduct of US with essential role of funding, capacity-building and training initiatives on one hand and reluctance to contribute its own troops on the other. In his analysis this role of US will continue in times to come given the culture and politics of American ambivalence coupled with institutional roadblocks. Paul Williams writes about United Kingdom (UK) and assesses its metamorphosis from top contributor in mid 1995 to an entity more interested in wielding strategic influence as a member of Security Council and thereby aligning more with non-UN frameworks like NATO than the UN itself. According to Paul, UK has developed a degree of skepticism about the effectiveness of UN multidimensional peacekeeping, especially related to questions concerning force structure, command and control, rules of engagement and national caveats. Out of the discussion in Paul’s work, a picture so emerges that UK is in a mode of catching up with the influence exercised by US by striding on the same trail that US has left behind. As for China, Gill and Huang elucidate that how the country has altered its approach from initial skepticism to multidimensional participation in peacekeeping. Citing various normative and practical factors behind these alterations the authors posit that such participation …show more content…
However, as the first entry in its genre it would have been perfect on the part of editors if they would have trimmed the number of individual nations’ analysis and roped in some entries on the ‘ought to be’ imagination of peacekeeping contributions. Although, in the concluding chapter editors do suggest some future strategies for UN but they make the proposition in a formalistic way wherein ethical adaptations are lacking. For instance, in the chapter by Donald Daniel, one of the pools of the three identified pools is OWAC (Overlapping Western Agendas Cluster) which is directly related to the short mentioning of internalization of UN and Non–UN partnerships later in the concluding part of the book. A comment on the lines that UN Peacekeeping should essentially have a singular agenda of bringing peace and security rather than catering to political agendas of some block could have been an important input given the fact that the book by its title itself purports to deal with the ‘politics’ and ‘challenges’ of peace providing. Also, suggestions like pre-deployment orientation of the troops and a model contract for fixing the state responsibility in case of wrong committed during peacekeeping operations by the troops of the lead nations, if included, could have formed a
Although the concept of peacekeeping was evident before Lester B. Pearson, it was him who promoted for United Nations to establish an official peacekeeping force during the Suez crisis. He stated, “We need action not only to end the fighting but to make the peace... My own government would be glad to recommend Canadian participation in such
Pearson also did an excellent job in international affairs. In the 1960’s, Pearson proposed to the United Nations a peace keeping force. This force could be used in war to maintain peace and ceasefire. During the wars in the Middle East, Pearson sent the first designated peacekeeping mission to countries at war in the Middle East. (Baldwin 39)
America with open arms has accepted the role of the world’s police. It could be argued that it created the role for itself. That is the premise of Andrew Bacevich’s Washington Rules. Bacevich discusses over sixty years of American Foreign Policy, from Truman to now, to explain the premise of the “Washington Rules.” The Washington Rules is about American militarist belief that Americans must “lead, save, liberate, and ultimately transform the world”, this could only be accomplished by an idea described by Bacevich as “the sacred trinity”.
Unless someone/something is a dire threat to the country, peacekeeping was not obligation but an optional concern for Canada to take on. This was one of the reasons why Canada didn 't take the United Nations as seriously as it should have. Canada was always ready to contribute its all to the UN in the past but due to the lack of involvement Canada lowered on the rank.
Proof: After their first assembly, the United nations established in the 1960s and 70s “short-term missions in the Dominican Republic - Mission of the Representative of the Secretary-General in the Dominican Republic (DOMREP), West New Guinea (West Irian) - UN Security Force in West New Guinea( UNSF), and Yemen - UN Yemen Observation Mission (UNYOM), and started longer term deployments in Cyprus - UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) and the Middle East - UN Emergency Force II (UNEF II), UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF)and UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL).”
It had a lot of terms to try to maintain world peace. Cold war tensions between the USSR and the USA prevented a permanent UN force from being created. As an alternative, the UN decided to send temporary military forces into the world regional hotspots to keep the peace. Military officials were sent to the Pakistan-India region of Kashmir. The same action was taken the following month along the Arab-Israeli borders in Palestine.
There are many reasons why Canada is similar to many first world countries, however, does Canada have a distinct identity? Canada is an unique country for it is filled with many diverse ethnicities. Canada plays a distinct role of peacekeepers by helping and protecting many countries in times of need. Finally, Canada gets its identity from individuals living around the world for they give Canada its characteristics. This essay will show that Canada does have a distinct identity and is shown through multicultural people living in Canada, Canada 's role as peacekeepers, and the characteristics the world gives Canada.
A Separate Peace was written by John Knowles. It was published in 1959 by the publisher Secker and Warburg, and contains 236 pages. The genre of the book is naturalism fiction. This tells the story of a boy at boarding school during World War 2, and his mixed feelings of admiration and jealousy he harbors for his best friend and roommate. The book was pretty okay and interesting to read, keeping an odd taste.
Peacekeeping is a part of Canadian identity because Canadians are credited with inventing UN Peacekeepers, with this reputation Canadians are also viewed as prime candidates for peacekeeping missions due to being a skilled, neutral group. Canadians are “credited with having "invented" interpositionary peacekeeping” to resolve the Suez Crisis, because of this “the UN looked at Canada as a candidate for every peacekeeping mission” because “who better to try to keep the peace?” After this the UN viewed Canada as peacekeeping leaders because they invented peacekeeping and knew how to peacefully resolve a conflict in a time where many others would try to solve it through combat. When looking into peacekeeping and the Suez Crisis there is one man who stands out, Lester B Pearson, the Canadian external affairs minister who ended a crisis as well as a true Canadian who came up with the idea for UN Peacekeeping. “Pearson won the Nobel Peace Prize, the only Canadian ever to do so” and is credited to have “saved the world with his proposal to defuse the Suez crisis.”
In 1820, trying to emerge his artistic vocation with his faith and focus in illustrated the message in each verse of the Bible passage from Isaiah 11:6-9, the American Folk artist Edward Hicks created in oil on canvas the painting the Peaceable Kingdom. The wording from New International Bible Gateway follows: The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; And the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.
The United States, Europe and Japan saw such a potential monopoly as a danger. This war is important because it puts forward a perfect example of Realism being practiced in real life. The war shows us the need of an International Peacekeeping Organization but also warns us that they might not always be useful and this is when the use of ‘Power’ comes in which is the essence of Realism. In this case the ‘Power’ we are referring to is the United States which intervened in this war to help Kuwait defeat Iraq.
Protect civilians in armed conflict, including through UN peacekeepers;3. End impunity through judicial action in national and international courts;4. Gather information and set up an early-warning system; and5. Take swift and decisive action, including military action.” (UN).
Therefore, this paper is designed to illustrate reasons why the UNSC should be reformed. The first and foremost factor to why the UNSC should be reformed is because the veto power used within the council only revolves around the permanent members’ interests. By 1990s, one
Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter states that, "all member states shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, nor in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations” . It is therefore a unilateral agreement signed by member states against the use of force when dealing each other. World events however since the signing and ratification of the UN Charter have indicated that states who are signatories to the charter continue to use force against each other for various reasons. Some 25 years after the writing and ratification of the charter one cannot doubt that states have used force and sought to justify it through individual or collective self-defence claims, as well as humanitarian claims in furtherance of national agendas and to increase territory. This no doubt may have been what frustrated Franck into the stance that Article 2(4) was in its grave.
With the security council as its quasi-leader, the UN is able to generate and pass out resolutions when international matters need to be addressed. Though, like every IGO, the UN is non binding, IGOs like the UN survive based off the four principles aforementioned in the second paragraph. The UN has been successful in resolving several conflicts, which is an idea that stays parallel with neoliberal theory. Through varying peace enforcement measures, the UN has managed to resolve conflicts such as the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, reach and establish peace in Cote d’ivoire, and resolve ethnic conflict in Kosovo. Though these initiatives required the use of force, they helped reduce war and genocide, and returned the world to the status