During the election of 2016, America watched as history was made. For starters, a woman was almost elected to be the 45th president of the United States. Not only that but also that woman was the first to even win the nomination of a major political party! That was not the only prominent thing about 2016’s presidential election. Senator Bernie Sanders, who deems himself to be a democratic socialist, very nearly won the nomination for the Democratic Party. Sanders’ campaign was so much more successful than anyone else could have expected, and it sparked many debates. One such debate is whether or not socialism is a valid form of government. On paper, socialism seems to be a very legitimate form of government, but history is it against it. Still, …show more content…
The Encyclopedia Britannica defines it as a “social and economic doctrine that calls for public rather than private ownership or control of property and natural resources (Ball and Dagger).” There have been several examples of it over the course of the last hundred or so years, some of them have worked out and some have not. Peronism is a good example of a socialist government that has out so well. Under the Peronist regime that existed in Argentina until 2015, the economic growth slowed drastically while inflation rose (Meltzer). Until Margaret Thatcher was elected as prime minister and effectively revolutionized the British economy, Britain also suffered in a socialist regime (Meltzer). Allen Meltzer claims that capitalism inspires growth and innovation while socialism does not (Meltzer). He also points out how costly socialism can be- if Senator Sanders had been elected to be president, then all of his socialist plans would have cost taxpayers around $3 trillion (Meltzer). This is a lofty sum of money, and understandably this caused many Americans to be skeptical of the senator’s election. That does not mean that they would not, however. In fact, 47% of Americans have said that they would vote for a socialist candidate (“Americans’ Willingness to Vote for a Socialist …show more content…
The most prominent example is that of the Scandinavian countries- namely Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. Under a socialist government, these countries have not suffered as the other countries have; they have actually flourished. These countries are known for their socialist governments, and they have actually become role-model societies for other countries to follow (Ingebritsen). Why would an economic system work for these countries, but not the others? Why would that system work at all? Well, for starters, people need to work! Not only that but if all are working but only some are benefiting (which does happen in capitalistic societies), then eventually the inequality between the classes will become glaringly obvious and cause problems! Not only that but when only a few rich and powerful people control the markets, that can threaten the sanctity of democracy (Purdy). Socialism fixes all of these problems by eliminating the one man who controls everything and giving the power back to those who
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Instead of splitting the population and using hardworking people unfairly, socialism allows an equal share among everyone so there is not a huge split between the wealth of a group. The packers and factory leaders all use the
I think that Senator Sanders did a fine job in including and shifting also the focus on the solutions that will not only help the future of our country, but also the help the middle class. Although I understand that Senator Sanders has good purpose to bring to light the injustice that the middle class faces, we have to also face the reality that is that our political system has been made that the wealthy are the ones who have the most power and voice in our country. Not in a negative way, but in a sense that capitalism and wealth go hand in hand, therefore our country can no way evade this system that has been around for long. This book on Senator Sander’s speech, is relevant to our political system because it brings to light how a socialist mindset or behavior isn’t what helps or ultimately makes up our country, but proves that capitalism is how our system is
As I stated before, to this day, many American’s disagree with the idea of socialism. One of the reasons why they dislike it is because it makes those of higher statuses and wealth or in power lose their opportunity to grow their businesses and become much bigger and more
Socialism is a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community
However, even with the failures of 20th Century socialistic regimes, would socialism be better suited and successful in a more modern society such as America today? This lends to the debate of different socialists organizations within America and which would be best suited for the job of establishing a new socialistic America. To which, if one is found, would that form of socialism be successful to preserving democracy and maintaining a non-radical stance to power and control unlike past socialist regimes? Socialism in itself is of public concern; socialism is making resurgence back into American politics, this ideology has not been a competing opponent to typical political parties in America since the early 20th century. While in the present, socialism is returning and the ideas of Democratic Socialism could be the best form of socialism in America, due to its reform movements, the goals of equality of labor, wealth and society and how America would look as a new 21st Century
The leftist wave that elected Justin Trudeau as the Prime Minister of Canada last year, made Jeremy Corbyn the leader of the Labour Party of UK is now seeing its third counterpart in the most indispensable nation-Bernie Sanders. The American nation no matter the indispensable claim-has never been framed by the socialist ideology. Outlining the contours of socialism precisely, throughout the American history finds a weak journey. Tracing the itinerary of socialism in the United States it started out as an anarchist movement, leading to socialism in 1930’s and its eventual decay due to the label of ‘McCarthyism’-the association with communism defeated the ideology further.
Also, the politicians would have had to been on board with these things instead of everyone trying to make themselves rich. When society works together as a whole, everyone benefits. It is easy to see why people would want to run to the Socialist Party after living and working in the conditions that they did. They would provide citizens with significant social benefits, including guaranteed employment or unemployment insurance and free or heavily subsidized health care, child care, and education. However, it would make people dependent on the state for things that could easily be obtained for themselves and people would be regulated to what kinds of goods and services are produced, how much they cost, the wages or salaries paid to people in different professions, and how much wealth a single individual may accumulate.
For example, people have equal wages so they don’t get jealous or feel like they are making less than they should. In addition, they have trade unions to stick up for them. Lastly there is a vision of no classes which means no rich or poor people. For instance, the middle class or bourgeoisie runs the country because without them the industry or farms wouldn’t function. Hence, there are no wealthy people hoarding currency which means more money goes to the people.
“Socialism” and “communism” was introduced into America’s political lingo when the reformers tried to own useful property together as a community instead of private individuals. Several Utopian societies attempted to change traditional gender roles and
Socialism is progression and is in the interest of the entire population. Bernie Sanders of course doesn’t want to change the form of government we have now but does have the same views as a socialist form of government. Sanders just wants more equality for
Socialism: Socialism is a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. 26. Strike: A strike is a refusal to work organized by a group of employees as a form of protest, typically in an attempt to gain a concession from their
In a socialist economy, all business properties are state owned. The focus of a socialist economy is to maximize social welfare instead of profit. Scholars theorize that socialism developed from capitalism. It rose to prominence to improve the flaws found in a capitalist economic system. Socialism provides a direct line between citizens and goods.
Capitalism says that starvation and greed are ultimately the only reasons why people would want to work. Whereas, socialism states that the pleasure that a person gets from doing what they love is enough to fuel their want to work for society as a whole. “We don't agree with the capitalist assumption that starvation or greed are the only reasons people work. People enjoy their work if it is meaningful and enhances their lives,” (pg. 2, Socialism Pro). I strongly believe that the biggest motivator is starvation, especially if you have a family; but if you can help a person become financially stable and help educate them so that they may find the career they find the most pleasing, suddenly most people would have no problem working.
This is probably because there would be no privacy even for the government, and if someone wanted to they could walk into your home and grab everything in sight, like Pokemon. Socialism is also like capitalism because it does not believe workers will overthrow the capitalists suddenly and violently. ( NEWSELA)This may