I agree with a lot of what rmiddle has to say.
I have faith in the free-markets. I have zero-faith in government solutions. Common core is a great example of a government solution to it 's own inability to provide world class education.
People that aren 't already actively involved in their children 's education obviously don 't care about the quality of education their children recieve. There are many successful people that have demonstrated that they care about all children having the opporunity for a quality education, which is a lot more that a lot of people that send their children to public schools to be babysat and become proxy-wards of the state. These are people who have a sense of entitlement for the status they have. That status that only government can create. Where people come to feel that just because they had a child (or children),
…show more content…
Now for a personal anectdote (I know, FALLACY!). My mom taught me the three Rs (readin ', ritin ', rithmetic) before I started K. I was always ahead of my peers in almost everything until 6th grade. I started pre algebra. I could do the math. It was easy. I failed because I didn 't take notes and did the math in my head not showing work on tests, and I didn 't do homework (correct answers on math tests were only worth only about ½ a point on tests). Because homework, notes, and showing work were weighted so much just in math, I repeated pre algebra until 10th grade. Always got correct answers on tests. I demonstrated that I could get the right answer without aid (calculaters weren 't allowed until I got into algebra). I demonstrated that I would do the math. Government standards demanded that demonstrating skills isn 't enough to pass a simple math class. So I was held back to repeat something that I found simple because of silly grading metrics. That 's what government standards do. They hold people back. Common core is no exception of this, but only makes it obvious that government standards will only hold
In the article, “Quarrel over Common Core: A Pennsylvania Primer” by Randy Kraft (2014), Common Core and the controversy surrounding it are discussed heavily. Kraft’s thesis is to inform the audience about Common Core and explain, impartially, the arguments for and against it. In 2010, Pennsylvania took on the Common Core Standards. These standards were put in place to ensure that students of Pennsylvania were on the same academic level by graduation, and enable them to be better equipped to compete in a global marketplace (p. 1).
Many school districts and teachers have openly stated they do not agree with the Common Core standards and wish they did not have to implement them, but to get the funding the school needs they do. With curriculum changes currently happening all around the country, wherever the reader is have heard about the upcoming changes and have formed their own opinion on it. This is the closest anyone could get to the Colorado situation without actually being there. Common Core is such a controversial topic that many people think over reaches the federal governments grasp on education (CBS, 2014, para. 22). The states hold the power of education, which is why, up until now in history, there have been no national standards.
The Reason the United States Government Has Failed its People It is now January 3rd, 1931, and I have been unemployed and homeless for over a year now living on the streets of Chicago. About ten years ago, I started working in a factory that created underarm deodorant. Around a year and a half ago, my wage was decreased. Eventually I was fired.
Common core standards should be taught in the dominant way to solve the problem first, and when the majority of the students understand the concept, other complex ways to solve the problem can be taught from a variety of choices to choose from. This process is time consuming, but it is a guaranteed way to increase the child’s brain level of understanding, since they are at an age that is still under developed and have trouble solving challenging
“When the Common Core first caught public attention in early 2010, it seemed like an unstoppable locomotive… As I write in the summer of 2014, the prospect is a bit different. That locomotive is nowhere to be seen and may be lying on its side in a dry gulch”(Wood 29). Common Core started off strong however, after uncovering all of the problems that lie within it, it has become more of a problem than a
A Christian Worldview of Common Core Standards Christal Klinger EDU 520: Bishop Current Issues WebQuest: Session 4 A Christian Worldview of Common Core Standards The national Common Core standards assist in education by the use of a system of academic expectations students across the country must satisfy in order to move to the next grade level or graduate from high school. Consistency can occur because all students’ basic skills in English and math standards are evident. Why, therefore, are there concerns about the implementation and use of Common Core standards?
Common Core is a widely debated topic here in America. However I feel like it shouldn't be because it violates one of our Bill of Rights, the 10th Amendment to be exact “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the states Respectively, or to the people.” (10th Amendment in the Constitution) Therefore, it’s the individual rights of the states to decide if they want to use Common Core. But, I do feel like it's useless.
In exchange for the strong accountability, No Child Left Behind gives states more flexibility in the use of their federal funding. As a result, principals and administrators have more time to devote to students’ needs and spend less time dealing with government forms. They have more freedom to be innovative and give resources as they are needed; thereby giving parents a greater opportunity to decide what schools need which programs. There has been a lot of controversy about No Child Left Behind. Teachers, schools, educational organizations and even some states have come forward and said that No Child Left Behind to be ineffective, not working, and overall flawed for many different reasons.
Assessment for Assessment I think Common Core Standard is a tolerable curriculum. It has many benefits such as preparing students for a competitive global economy, providing national continuity in education, and reflect aspirations for student achievement and an understanding of the realities of the classroom. But not all things are flawless. Common Core Standards does have a few down sides such as not guarantee improvements in testing on the global scale and it is a program pushed by the government, which you either adopt the program or you get no money for the schools.
Common core education does not take into account your child’s dreams and aspirations nor their interests or what they excel at most. Common core education has begun to harm a kid’s education and their love of learning instead of increasing it. It is an outdated and unnecessary tradition. People have been going along with it for years but there comes a time when you have to look at the results and not just the theory.
In American society, the quality of public education is a vital topic for debate. While critics allege that the politicization of public education in underachieving communities has led to ineffective policies and reforms, proponents allege that public education still acts as an entrance to greater opportunities for students of all backgrounds. These two assertions have created a dichotomy amongst educators, policymakers, politicians, and parents. Thus, a reactionary perspective of educational reform has been proposed in response to advocates of public education.
Many people say that the Common standards are not culturally equitable, and that it has harmed student’s love of literature and progress in math. Parents also feel it has taken away their say in their child’s education. The standards were developed behind
This forces students to be critical thinkers, problem solvers, and analytical thinkers which helps them be ready for the future; college, career, and life. The Common Core also concentrates on a clear set of math skills and concepts. This forces students to learn concepts in a more organized way. These standards encourage students to solve real-world problems (New York State Common Core
Recently, the Common Core State Standards were developed and kids were going to be tested more than ever. However, all of this education reform has been a failure because our testing scores have not improved, the testing makes children suffer, and it doesn’t improve how teachers teach. Education reforms has had little effect on our testing scores. The average score for a 17 year old student doing a reading test in the beginning of school is 285 and over 40
According to the Huffington Post, the United States spends more money on student education each year than any other developed country (Klein). However, American students have routinely found themselves with test scores that lag behind those of our competitors (Klein). Alabama, one of the poorest states in the country, is not exempt from America 's education woes, and the state struggles to determine how to best educate its K-12 population. One of the clearest signs of this problem lies in the large number of Alabama 's poor rural and urban school districts that regularly fail standardized tests. While the Alabama government has made some attempt at combating such deplorable test scores, funding issues, interest groups, and the political