In American society, the quality of public education is a vital topic for debate. While critics allege that the politicization of public education in underachieving communities has led to ineffective policies and reforms, proponents allege that public education still acts as an entrance to greater opportunities for students of all backgrounds. These two assertions have created a dichotomy amongst educators, policymakers, politicians, and parents. Thus, a reactionary perspective of educational reform has been proposed in response to advocates of public education. Using national testing data, this paper will examine educational trends over the past forty-five years in order to determine whether or not a 'golden age' in public education existed. …show more content…
This report sought to respond to the claim that public education was failing to impart students with the skills necessary for success in a competitive marketplace. Specifically, it alleged that "a rising tide of mediocrity" was threatening the future of public education (Bell 1983: 1). In order to support this claim, the report surveyed a pool of studies which indicated severe underachievement on national and international scales. For example, the report indicated that the verbal section of SAT scores had dropped "over fifty points, and the mathematics section of SAT scores had dropped "nearly forty points" from 1963 to 1980. Furthermore, the report indicated that almost forty percent of seventeen year old students were unable to properly "draw inferences from written material" (Bell 1983:21). Consequently, the commission led to thirty-eight recommendations for the future of public education. This triggered a wave of educational reforms, and thirty-eight recommendations for education among five different categories. …show more content…
This snapshot of standardized testing date over time examines historical achievement gaps in public education. For example, the data explores racial gaps over time, gender gaps over time, and the performance of public schools in relation to Catholic schools. Concerning racial gaps over time, the data indicates that white, black, and Hispanic students have achieved at significantly greater rates since the 1970's (NCES 2012:18). Specifically, the data indicates that since 1971, black students' scores have increased by thirty points, and Hispanic students' scores have increased by twenty one points. Thus, on average, "the white-black score gap has narrowed twenty-seven points since 1971" (NCES 2012:19). Additionally, the gender score gap among public school students has narrowed roughly eight points since 1971. Nonetheless, female students continue to outperform male students in reading at all ages. This indicates that while both students excel according to similar rates of achievement in the contemporary era, public education still produces gendered results. In relation to Catholic schools, public schools continue to fall short of producing successful indicators of achievement. For example, in 2012, Catholic school students scored an average
Confidence in the principle of universal equality of educational opportunity is difficult to maintain when one views the breadth of the educational landscape in America. When observing two schools that fall on opposite sides of the spectrum in nearly every measurable aspect, it is crucial to make sense of where such disparity is founded so that the education system can be altered to better society. One such example of a tremendous educational gap is found in the 3.6 miles that span between the Nashville High Schools Pearl Cohn and Hume Fogg. Pearl Cohn, an entertainment magnet school located in a predominantly African American and poor socioeconomic area, has a 69% graduation rate, whereas Hume Fogg, an academic magnet school with 97% of students
Carnoy, Loeb, and Smith (2003) found a weakness in the relationships between TAKS scores and other outcomes such as high school graduation rates and scores on college entrance exams. Other researchers (Klein, Hamilton, McCaffrey, & Steecher, 2000) analyzed increases in scores in Texas on the NAEP, increases that they state political leaders attributed to the accountability system, and found that Texas score improvements in mathematics at grade 8 are not significantly different from those of other states that did not have strong accountability systems in place. In fact their data show evidence that the achievement gap between white students and underrepresented minorities actually increased. Some argue that the data show that the accountability program actually negatively impacts schools that were already academically behind before the implementation of the accountability system (Fassold,
If you were to change something about the education system in the U.S, what would you change? How would you critique the quality of education? Education historian Diane Ravitch answers these questions in her excerpt that was published in 2014, “The Essentials of a Good Education.” In her text Ravitch argues that the education system is flawed and that the vision of a good education is unfair and unequal. Ravitch supports her claim by providing examples of the negative effects of the educational system and using historical context.
Against School by John Gatto is an essay that attempts to persuade the reader that public education fails to educate its students. The main way Gatto tries to persuade his audience is by presenting anecdotal evidence and by showing the historical narrative to the education system of the Untied States. Gatto attempts also attempts to reach out to his audience by referring to commonalities in the public education system that have been experienced by many people. Overall the essay is persuasive but lacks any practical authority. The first thing the author does is provide background, background on himself and the situation with education in the United States; and, this is what the author primarily does.
n “The Failure of American Public Education” (February 01 1993), John Hood explains the sundry perspectives on the American education system. Hood tactfully uses cause and effect to demonstrate the viewpoints of a myriad of individuals regarding American schools and their approaches to effectively educating students; he explains how “free-market thinkers believe that applying market competition to the public schools will solve many of America’s educational problems” (Hood) ; “critics believe that public education reforms fail because they are compromised or sabotaged by the education lobbies—teacher associations, administrators, and the legislators in their pockets” (Hood) and “many conservatives believe that American public education is in
Asian students perform as well as white students in reading and better than white students in math. Reformers ignore these gains and castigate the public schools for the persistence of the gap. Closing the racial achievement gap has been a major goal of education policy makers for at least the past decade. There has been some progress, but it has been slow and uneven. It isn’t surprising that it’s hard to narrow or close the gap if all groups are improving.
Martha Peraza SOC 3340 Inequality in Education California State University, Bakersfield Abstract In the United States, there exists a gap in equality for different demographics of students. The factors contributing to educational disadvantages include socioeconomic struggles, gender of students, language or culture, and particularly for the scope of this paper, race.
In the article,”Why Standardized Tests Don’t Measure Education Quality” published by Educational Leadership, the authors explain,”Such information, because it illuminates a child’s strengths and weaknesses, can be helpful not only in dealing with their child’s teacher but also in determining at home assistance”(Popham 1). Not everything can be taught in the classroom and sometimes kids need to find extra help outside of school. These standardized tests have always been an efficient way to show where these problem areas are so that students can focus on areas where they need more attention. Continuing to use these standardized tests heavily impact the learning of American students. By looking at the data from standardized tests in American schools, they can show what extra work needs to be done in order to improve students’
Thank you so much for taking your time out of your very busy days to join us. It is always wonderful to share thoughts with people of your expertise, especially on a subject that affects my everyday life. Education is paramount to achieving success, and living in the modern world. In my school we take several standardized tests that are supposed to measure how much knowledge I’ve retained throughout the year. These exams have changed the way that children are taught, and have made public schools int a limited learning environment.
Introduction In 2001, when the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was created, the goal of NCLB was to increase the accountability of schools for the educational outcomes of their students and to bridge the gap between poor and high-performing students and districts. To accomplish this, NCLB placed considerable importance on standardized testing, which I will be examining the effectiveness of relative to the goals that NCLB sought to accomplish by 2014, within this paper. NCLB brought attention to the achievement gap and spurred efforts to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly disadvantaged populations, through its accountability measures and reporting requirements, but its reliance on standardized testing and punitive consequences
Controversies between policymakers and education research are credibility, quality, bias and unclear data. Meanwhile, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Education Science Reform (ESR) acts transformed American Education with laws; high stakes testing and reporting systems such as, Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) and Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT). Conversely, Science based researches and evidenced based practices continue to overwhelm the educational system policies on what is effective or ineffective. “Multiple accountability systems have left the general public confused about the quality of their local schools” (Borko, Liston, & Whitcomp 2007, p. 99).
Education Reforms Education reform is legislation to improve the quality of education in the United States. Once, grades were the most important achievement for students. However, politicians and the public were concerned that our standardized test scores were not as good as those of other countries. Therefore, state and national governments started making laws to make school more challenging and to test kids more. One of those laws was “No Child Left Behind”.
The education system in the United States of America is failing to prepare the children for the real world. Our system cannot compete with other countries, teachers are limited on what they can teach, poverty, educational reforms, standards and curriculums, and teachers shortage. These factors are some of many things that make the system fail. In the year of 1983, the U.S. Department of Education stated that the nation's public system is at risk. )
Lately the government has been making the school systems’ priorities about other things rather than diverting all of their focus on the good of the students. Denise Gelberg, a former teacher, shared her experience of how the education department even considered choosing in between her ultimate goal of educating her students or just focusing on the organization’s functionality (Gelberg). The government does not necessarily need to allocate more funds towards schools in order to better results, but they need to change the way that their system works. There are school systems that do not make their educational plans for their students in a coherent matter. The curriculum for grade school, middle school, and high school do not always line up, so occasionally there are holes in some students’ educations.
Moreover, McEachern (2014) cited that the achievement gaps are found in all education systems. Studies, concentrated in the United States but also conducted in other countries, have considered racial and ethnic achievement gaps (Lee, 2002, 2004), urban-rural achievement gaps (Graham & Provost, 2012; Provasnik, 2007), gender achievement gaps (Benson, 2005b; Marks, 2008; Shafiq, 2011), private-public school achievement gaps (C. Lubienski, Weitzel, & S.T. Lubienski, 2009), and more. Certain groups of children may perform below average based on a variety of factors, such as poverty, family composition, teacher/school quality, school access, technology, and motivation, among others (Davis-Kean, 2005; Entwisle & Alexander, 1992; Rankin & Quane,