“In my political philosophy, I think that there is sometimes room for violence” (Trudeau, 1972, 67). This quote shows a glimpse of the true nature and political approach of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. Pierre Trudeau served his time as Prime Minister of Canada from 1968-1979 and again from 1980-1984. Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau had a negative impact on Canada during his time as Prime Minister of Canada during the twentieth century. First, it took the succeeding Prime Ministers 30 years to fiscally restore the country from when Trudeau almost made the country go bankrupt, nearly splitting the country in the process. Secondly, Prime Minister Trudeau knew and fully understood the conditions and treatment of Indigenous people in Canada but …show more content…
Firstly, he created the 1969 White Paper, which aimed to assimilate Indigenous people into Canadian culture. “He [Trudeau] and Jean Chrétien, his minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development at the time, proposed in a White Paper in 1969 that the special legal relationship between First Nations and the government of Canada be severed and all Indigenous Peoples fully integrated into Canadian life” (Blake & Donaldson, 2021). The 1969 White Paper was met with vigorous opposition from Indigenous leaders all across the country and it sparked the beginning of a new era of Indigenous political organizing in Canada. Trudeau soon recognized that his largely assimilationist policy was not likely to convince anyone that it was either workable or just. Subsequently, he fully understood the conditions and treatment of Indigenous people in Canada and did not do anything to help them; “Trudeau understood fully the conditions in which many Indigenous Peoples lived in 1969. Yet, he found the notion of treaty rights between two groups within the same society or special status for any group at odds with his notion of common and equal citizenship” (Blake & Donaldson, 2021). Even though he understood what was happening to the Indigenous people in Canada, he turned a blind eye. “He found the notion of treaty rights between two groups within …show more content…
To begin with, the enactment of the National Energy Program was not in and of itself a negative concept. The oil producing provinces in Western Canada saw the National Energy Program as a way to keep energy prices low in order to supply Eastern Canada with the energy they needed. “Producing provinces in the West saw the NEP as another strategy to keep energy prices depressed in order to benefit the energy-hungry provinces in the East” (National Energy Program (1980–1984) - Natural Gas - Alberta's Energy Heritage, n.d.). This shows that the National Energy Program didn’t negatively impact all parties involved, however, it did start some tensions between Eastern and Western Canada. Secondly, Eastern provinces in Canada felt they were being painted as the greedy ben in the National Energy Program. “To Albertans, the NEP policies hardly seemed fair; they were tired of being painted by Trudeau’s Liberals as being greedy and un-Canadian” (National Energy Program (1980–1984) - Natural Gas - Alberta's Energy Heritage, n.d.). Eastern provinces, especially Alberta, were upset at being painted as greedy, since their money cycled through the nation's entire economy just like every other province's money. This made the tensions between Eastern and Western Canada grow even more. Lastly, in reaction to the National Energy Program, many
He pushed an ambitious agenda promoting industries, building railways and opening the west to immigrants from Europe. With that Canada started its way to multiculturalism. However, this plan didn’t present equal opportunities for immigrants. British people got jobs before others, and immigration threatened the survival of the natives.
In the 20th century, lots of different people of different cultures had come to Canada hoping that they would get better lifestyle, get their rights and do whatever they want to. But what happened is that the people living over there were forced to vacate the land for the other people who came there for earning some capital. This created problems between the first nation people and the Canadian government. Amongst the aboriginal people, there was a person called Joe capilano who was the leader of the Squamish people raised his voice against this issue. “The photo of Joe capilano holding a totem pole clearly shows that he was proud of his culture, he was persistent to fight for aboriginal rights and finally he was a fearless leader”.
MacDonald’s treatment of Aboriginals hurt the growth of Canada and set a standard of maltreatment toward Aboriginals that is continued today. While he was labelled as a friend and admired by Aboriginals, MacDonald’s actions reveal his true feelings and demonstrate his lack of regard for their wellbeing and rights. One can see that his mistreatment extends not just to those in Canada, but also those who are emigrating from other countries and regions, such as Asia. MacDonald was especially racist toward Asians, creating legislation that excluded the Chinese and Mongolian, marking them to be unfit for political office and representation. He felt that this exclusion was necessary to establish European dominance across Canada and
For decades, Canada has treated the Aboriginal peoples of Canada unfairly and that must change. The Environmental Party of Canada will strive to shine a light on these issues and bring awareness
Pearson completed and formed many programs and acts that helped Canada and beyond. As shown through his excellent job in politics, international affairs and improvement of Canadian lives, Pearson was able to become a successful Prime Minister. Over time, Canada has selected many strong Prime Ministers. However, as shown throughout this essay, Lester B. Pearson was possibly the
Pierre Trudeau was one of the iconic leaders of Canada who brought forth a new verve of energy in the country. It was his charismatic personality coupled with revolutionary ideas and beliefs that helped him climb up the ladder to serve the most prestigious and responsible chair of the country. Pierre Trudeau was born on October 18, 1919 in Montréal, Quebec. His terms of office were from April 20, 1968 to June 3, 1979 as well as March 3, 1980 to June 30, 1984. Pierre Trudeau had been a Liberal political party leader from 1968–1984.
However contemporary Canada is not without its issues, as stated earlier. Even with these important lessons, and our written out charter that has the basic rights for humans, we still fail to support and provide these rights to many marginalised communities and
Only in Quebec, where French-speakers were the overwhelming majority, was it possible to imagine the full economic, social, and cultural institutions of a modern society functioning in the French language” (Misconceiving Canada, page 32) As Quebec’s society modernized, Quebecois started seeing themselves as a distinct cultural group with its own history and values, separate from Anglo-Canadiens. They strongly believed that the federal government was failing to not only respect but also recognize its distinctiveness in the country. The Quiet Revolution symbolizes the future of Quebec’s Liberalism, however, displeased some such as Pierre Elliot Trudeau. “Upon his rejection of the Quiet Revolution would hang much of the future of Canadian politics.”
From 1867 to today, Canada has had twenty-three prime ministers, each of whom helped build and improve Canada. An analysis of former prime ministers William Lyon Mackenzie King, Lester Bowles Pearson, and Pierre Elliott Trudeau of Canada during the WWII, the fifties and sixties, and contemporary Canada, respectively, shows that Canadians should be proud of their nation and the people who led and shaped Canada to what it is today. During WWII, the leader seen as the greatest Canadian prime minister by scholars and academics in Maclean’s surveys guided Canada through the turbulent time. William Lyon Mackenzie King made many accomplishments during his time as the longest-serving prime minister, from 1921-1926, 1926-1930, and 1935-1948, and
There are countless leaders that changed Canada’s history in both good and bad ways. Some leaders and prime ministers are forgotten as history proceeds. Many tried shaping Canada’s history and changing its reputation. Canada had great leaders that made tremendous benefits to improve their country. However, a very kind man named Richard Bennett became a prime minister in the worse of Canada’s economics situation.
Canada is now known to be a diverse, multicultural, bilingual and inclusive nation largely as a result of his work. Pierre Elliott Trudeau also believed in an equal Canada for all, he is primarily the one to introduce rights and freedoms to the citizens of Canada. While some view Pierre Trudeau as impulsive, for enforcing the War Measures Act, Trudeau enacted this for the protection of Canadian citizens against radical extremist and his actions were more rational than impulsive for the situation that had suddenly occurred. Pierre Trudeau was one of Canada’s greatest Prime Minister’s, who’s impact fundamentally changed the course of the nation by introducing multiculturalism, for introducing the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and for paradoxically upholding democracy by strong action during the October Crisis.
Institutional and historical analysis often portray the motives of governments, especially in the cases of Quebec separatism and Aboriginal mistreatment. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them. As scholars of Canadian politics, it is important to consider historical and institutional analyses when looking at any issue, as it reveals the underlying motives of actors in regards to the cleavages that comprise a state.
Canada was a place of conflict and change beginning under the monarchy and ending with the democracy with a lot of change in power from the French to the British.
Today, Canada is seen as a multicultural and peaceful nation that has evolved over the course of history. This great nation would never have been possible without the impact that former Prime Minister, Lester B. Pearson left on this country. His achievements and insights profoundly affected and shaped Canada’s nation. First, peacekeeping is an important part of Canada’s heritage and a reflection of its fundamental beliefs that Pearson implemented after dealing with world changing situations and winning a Nobel Prize. Also, his contributions as a liberal leader as well as the flaws and controversy with Diefenbaker did in fact define this country.
For a long time the debates had been going about how was the better prime minister of Canada. On the the top of most lists of best prime ministers are Mackenzie King and Sir John A. Macdonald. For example, according to the Expert Survey that was made in 2013 “Laurier came first, Macdonald second, and King third, but the difference in their overall scores was negligible”. Both prime ministers had a strong vision of the country that helped shaped Canada to become the country it is today(in 2015). Thesis: Sir John A.Macdonald was one of the founding fathers, but William Lyon Mackenzie King had to lead the country through the part of Depression and WWII, and they both have made different positive contributions to Canada and are highly respected